植入式助听器对听力损失患者谵妄风险的影响:一项国家数据库研究。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bryce Hambach, Jena Patel, Kathryn Nunes, Elliott M Sina, Pablo Llerena, Alexander Knops, Rebecca C Chiffer, Jacob B Hunter
{"title":"植入式助听器对听力损失患者谵妄风险的影响:一项国家数据库研究。","authors":"Bryce Hambach, Jena Patel, Kathryn Nunes, Elliott M Sina, Pablo Llerena, Alexander Knops, Rebecca C Chiffer, Jacob B Hunter","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Exploring whether the utilization of implantable hearing rehabilitation devices is associated with a reduced likelihood of developing delirium in patients with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort database study with propensity score matching (PSM) utilizing TriNetX clinical database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The US Collaborative Network within the TriNetX database (100 million people).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients over 55 years old were selected based on three categories: a non-hearing loss study control (ICD-10: H90-91), a hearing loss (HL without implantable device), and an implantable device cohort (ICD-10: Z96.21, Z96.29, 09HD, 09HE; CPT: 69714, 69930). Patients with prior dementia or memory loss diagnosis were excluded (F01-03, 27-29).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Observational.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for delirium diagnosis code (F0.5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control cohort (n = 36.5 million) was 1:1 PSM for age and sex with the HL cohort (n = 1.77 million) in which 0.28% of patients developed delirium compared to 0.74% in the HL cohort (OR 2.66, 95% CI = 2.58-2.75). When looking at the same PSM between HL and implantable device cohorts (n = 20,847), 0.81% developed a delirium diagnosis compared to 0.45% in the implantable device cohort (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.39-2.31). Further analysis accounting for 16 PSM covariates showed that 0.74% of the HL cohort developed delirium compared to 0.45% of the implantable device cohort (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.27-2.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study shows that patients with hearing loss were more likely to develop delirium than those with normal hearing. Importantly, patients with implantable hearing devices were significantly less likely to develop delirium compared to hearing loss patients without an implantable device. Our research highlights the importance of treating hearing loss to prevent delirium.Level of Evidence: III.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Implantable Hearing Devices on Delirium Risk in Patients with Hearing Loss: A National Database Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bryce Hambach, Jena Patel, Kathryn Nunes, Elliott M Sina, Pablo Llerena, Alexander Knops, Rebecca C Chiffer, Jacob B Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Exploring whether the utilization of implantable hearing rehabilitation devices is associated with a reduced likelihood of developing delirium in patients with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort database study with propensity score matching (PSM) utilizing TriNetX clinical database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The US Collaborative Network within the TriNetX database (100 million people).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients over 55 years old were selected based on three categories: a non-hearing loss study control (ICD-10: H90-91), a hearing loss (HL without implantable device), and an implantable device cohort (ICD-10: Z96.21, Z96.29, 09HD, 09HE; CPT: 69714, 69930). Patients with prior dementia or memory loss diagnosis were excluded (F01-03, 27-29).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Observational.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for delirium diagnosis code (F0.5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control cohort (n = 36.5 million) was 1:1 PSM for age and sex with the HL cohort (n = 1.77 million) in which 0.28% of patients developed delirium compared to 0.74% in the HL cohort (OR 2.66, 95% CI = 2.58-2.75). When looking at the same PSM between HL and implantable device cohorts (n = 20,847), 0.81% developed a delirium diagnosis compared to 0.45% in the implantable device cohort (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.39-2.31). Further analysis accounting for 16 PSM covariates showed that 0.74% of the HL cohort developed delirium compared to 0.45% of the implantable device cohort (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.27-2.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study shows that patients with hearing loss were more likely to develop delirium than those with normal hearing. Importantly, patients with implantable hearing devices were significantly less likely to develop delirium compared to hearing loss patients without an implantable device. Our research highlights the importance of treating hearing loss to prevent delirium.Level of Evidence: III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004416\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨植入式听力康复装置的使用是否与降低听力损失患者发生谵妄的可能性有关。研究设计:采用TriNetX临床数据库,采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)的回顾性队列数据库研究。设置:TriNetX数据库内的美国协作网络(1亿人)。患者:55岁以上的患者根据3个类别进行选择:非听力损失研究对照组(ICD-10: H90-91)、听力损失组(无植入式装置的HL)和植入式装置队列(ICD-10: Z96.21, Z96.29, 09HD, 09HE;Cpt: 69714, 69930)。排除既往有痴呆或记忆丧失诊断的患者(F01-03, 27-29)。干预措施:观察。主要结局指标:谵妄诊断代码95%置信区间的比值比(F0.5)。结果:对照队列(n = 3650万)的年龄和性别与HL队列(n = 177万)的PSM比例为1:1,其中0.28%的患者出现谵妄,而HL队列的这一比例为0.74% (OR 2.66, 95% CI = 2.58-2.75)。当观察HL组和植入式装置组之间相同的PSM时(n = 20,847), 0.81%的患者出现谵妄诊断,而植入式装置组为0.45% (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.39-2.31)。考虑16个PSM协变量的进一步分析显示,HL组中有0.74%的人出现谵妄,而植入性装置组中有0.45% (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.27-2.13)。结论:听力损失患者比听力正常患者更易发生谵妄。重要的是,与未使用植入式助听器的听力损失患者相比,使用植入式助听器的患者发生谵妄的可能性明显降低。我们的研究强调了治疗听力损失以预防谵妄的重要性。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Implantable Hearing Devices on Delirium Risk in Patients with Hearing Loss: A National Database Study.

Objective: Exploring whether the utilization of implantable hearing rehabilitation devices is associated with a reduced likelihood of developing delirium in patients with hearing loss.

Study design: A retrospective cohort database study with propensity score matching (PSM) utilizing TriNetX clinical database.

Setting: The US Collaborative Network within the TriNetX database (100 million people).

Patients: Patients over 55 years old were selected based on three categories: a non-hearing loss study control (ICD-10: H90-91), a hearing loss (HL without implantable device), and an implantable device cohort (ICD-10: Z96.21, Z96.29, 09HD, 09HE; CPT: 69714, 69930). Patients with prior dementia or memory loss diagnosis were excluded (F01-03, 27-29).

Interventions: Observational.

Main outcome measures: Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for delirium diagnosis code (F0.5).

Results: The control cohort (n = 36.5 million) was 1:1 PSM for age and sex with the HL cohort (n = 1.77 million) in which 0.28% of patients developed delirium compared to 0.74% in the HL cohort (OR 2.66, 95% CI = 2.58-2.75). When looking at the same PSM between HL and implantable device cohorts (n = 20,847), 0.81% developed a delirium diagnosis compared to 0.45% in the implantable device cohort (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.39-2.31). Further analysis accounting for 16 PSM covariates showed that 0.74% of the HL cohort developed delirium compared to 0.45% of the implantable device cohort (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.27-2.13).

Conclusions: The present study shows that patients with hearing loss were more likely to develop delirium than those with normal hearing. Importantly, patients with implantable hearing devices were significantly less likely to develop delirium compared to hearing loss patients without an implantable device. Our research highlights the importance of treating hearing loss to prevent delirium.Level of Evidence: III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信