全身阻断多巴胺受体对雄性大鼠获得双向主动回避的影响

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
L. Vercammen , A. Lopez-Moraga , T. Beckers , B. Vervliet , L. Luyten
{"title":"全身阻断多巴胺受体对雄性大鼠获得双向主动回避的影响","authors":"L. Vercammen ,&nbsp;A. Lopez-Moraga ,&nbsp;T. Beckers ,&nbsp;B. Vervliet ,&nbsp;L. Luyten","doi":"10.1016/j.nlm.2025.108039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Active threat avoidance is a core aspect of adaptive and maladaptive behavior, yet its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Prior studies concluded that pharmacologically blocking dopaminergic receptors (DRs) disrupted avoidance acquisition, but it remains unclear whether such effects on learning persist during a drug-free follow-up test. To assess the involvement of D1R and D2R in avoidance acquisition, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, thirty-six male Wistar rats underwent a single avoidance training session involving 30 tone-shock pairings. Rats could avoid the shock by moving to the opposite compartment of the shuttle box. Twenty minutes before training, rats received either D1R antagonist SCH<!--> <!-->23390 (0.05 mg/kg), D2R antagonist sulpiride (20 mg/kg), or vehicle. While sulpiride did not affect avoidance, 0.05 mg/kg SCH<!--> <!-->23390 significantly reduced the number of avoidance responses. In a separate test, 0.05 mg/kg SCH<!--> <!-->23390 also reduced locomotor activity. In Experiment 2 (N = 24), a lower dose of SCH<!--> <!-->23390 (0.025 mg/kg) was administered, and a drug-free avoidance test under continued reinforcement was added 24 h later to test for sustained effects of D1R blockade on avoidance in the absence of acute drug effects. Although animals avoided less with SCH<!--> <!-->23390 in the system, this effect did not persist 24 h later, suggesting that effects of D1R blockade during avoidance training might reflect an acute disruption of secondary processes involved in the performance of avoidance behavior rather than an actual impairment of avoidance learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19102,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of systemic blockade of dopamine receptors on the acquisition of two-way active avoidance in male rats\",\"authors\":\"L. Vercammen ,&nbsp;A. Lopez-Moraga ,&nbsp;T. Beckers ,&nbsp;B. Vervliet ,&nbsp;L. Luyten\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nlm.2025.108039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Active threat avoidance is a core aspect of adaptive and maladaptive behavior, yet its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Prior studies concluded that pharmacologically blocking dopaminergic receptors (DRs) disrupted avoidance acquisition, but it remains unclear whether such effects on learning persist during a drug-free follow-up test. To assess the involvement of D1R and D2R in avoidance acquisition, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, thirty-six male Wistar rats underwent a single avoidance training session involving 30 tone-shock pairings. Rats could avoid the shock by moving to the opposite compartment of the shuttle box. Twenty minutes before training, rats received either D1R antagonist SCH<!--> <!-->23390 (0.05 mg/kg), D2R antagonist sulpiride (20 mg/kg), or vehicle. While sulpiride did not affect avoidance, 0.05 mg/kg SCH<!--> <!-->23390 significantly reduced the number of avoidance responses. In a separate test, 0.05 mg/kg SCH<!--> <!-->23390 also reduced locomotor activity. In Experiment 2 (N = 24), a lower dose of SCH<!--> <!-->23390 (0.025 mg/kg) was administered, and a drug-free avoidance test under continued reinforcement was added 24 h later to test for sustained effects of D1R blockade on avoidance in the absence of acute drug effects. Although animals avoided less with SCH<!--> <!-->23390 in the system, this effect did not persist 24 h later, suggesting that effects of D1R blockade during avoidance training might reflect an acute disruption of secondary processes involved in the performance of avoidance behavior rather than an actual impairment of avoidance learning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742725000206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742725000206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动威胁回避是适应和不适应行为的一个核心方面,但其潜在机制尚不完全清楚。先前的研究得出结论,药物阻断多巴胺能受体(dr)会破坏回避习得,但尚不清楚这种对学习的影响是否在无药物随访试验中持续存在。为了评估D1R和D2R在回避习得中的作用,我们进行了两个实验。在实验1中,36只雄性Wistar大鼠接受了一个包含30对音调-电击的单一回避训练。老鼠可以通过移动到穿梭箱的对面隔间来避免电击。训练前20分钟,大鼠接受D2R拮抗剂SCH23390(0.05 mg/kg)、D2R拮抗剂舒匹利(20 mg/kg)或对照组。虽然舒必利不影响回避,但0.05 mg/kg SCH23390显著减少回避反应的次数。在另一项单独试验中,0.05 mg/kg SCH23390也能降低运动活动。在实验2 (N = 24)中,给予低剂量的SCH23390(0.025 mg/kg), 24 h后增加持续强化的无药物回避试验,以测试在没有急性药物效应的情况下,D1R阻断对回避的持续影响。虽然系统中存在SCH23390的动物回避较少,但这种影响在24 h后并未持续,这表明在回避训练期间D1R阻断的影响可能反映了涉及回避行为表现的次要过程的急性中断,而不是回避学习的实际损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of systemic blockade of dopamine receptors on the acquisition of two-way active avoidance in male rats
Active threat avoidance is a core aspect of adaptive and maladaptive behavior, yet its underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Prior studies concluded that pharmacologically blocking dopaminergic receptors (DRs) disrupted avoidance acquisition, but it remains unclear whether such effects on learning persist during a drug-free follow-up test. To assess the involvement of D1R and D2R in avoidance acquisition, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, thirty-six male Wistar rats underwent a single avoidance training session involving 30 tone-shock pairings. Rats could avoid the shock by moving to the opposite compartment of the shuttle box. Twenty minutes before training, rats received either D1R antagonist SCH 23390 (0.05 mg/kg), D2R antagonist sulpiride (20 mg/kg), or vehicle. While sulpiride did not affect avoidance, 0.05 mg/kg SCH 23390 significantly reduced the number of avoidance responses. In a separate test, 0.05 mg/kg SCH 23390 also reduced locomotor activity. In Experiment 2 (N = 24), a lower dose of SCH 23390 (0.025 mg/kg) was administered, and a drug-free avoidance test under continued reinforcement was added 24 h later to test for sustained effects of D1R blockade on avoidance in the absence of acute drug effects. Although animals avoided less with SCH 23390 in the system, this effect did not persist 24 h later, suggesting that effects of D1R blockade during avoidance training might reflect an acute disruption of secondary processes involved in the performance of avoidance behavior rather than an actual impairment of avoidance learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory publishes articles examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying learning and memory at all levels of analysis ranging from molecular biology to synaptic and neural plasticity and behavior. We are especially interested in manuscripts that examine the neural circuits and molecular mechanisms underlying learning, memory and plasticity in both experimental animals and human subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信