{"title":"在使用体积调制弧线治疗的加速部分乳房照射中呼吸运动的稳健规划方法。","authors":"Ryohei Yamauchi, Fumihiro Tomita, Satoshi Ishikura","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rraf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative treatment for early-stage breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the virtual bolus (VB) method and robust planning against respiratory motion in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-APBI. VMAT plans were generated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions for 16 patients. Four treatment plans were developed and compared: a standard optimization (SO) plan without robust methods, a pseudo-skin flash strategy using a 5 mm VB (with densities of 0.4 and 1.0 g/cm3, VB04 and VB10), and a robust optimization (RO) plan to minimize penalties in worst-case scenarios. The isocenter was shifted 1-5 mm in each translational direction in robust analysis, and perturbed dose calculations were performed. All dose constraints for the target in SO and VB plans were within acceptable limits, but the dose evaluation volume V95% in the RO plan was lower than in other plans (P < 0.05). The clinical target volume V95% of the RO plan was significantly higher than in VB04 and VB10 (P < 0.05). The RO plan showed the best performance for organs at risk, followed by SO and VB plans, which resulted in higher doses. The RO plan exhibited the smallest change (±2%) in dose distribution due to respiratory motion. By contrast, the SO plan lacked robustness owing to absence of sufficient fluence in the air surrounding the planning target volume outside of the skin surface. The RO plan offers superior target coverage, maximum dose, and robustness compared to SO and VB methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"185-195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A robust planning approach for respiratory motion in accelerated partial breast irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Ryohei Yamauchi, Fumihiro Tomita, Satoshi Ishikura\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrr/rraf011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative treatment for early-stage breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the virtual bolus (VB) method and robust planning against respiratory motion in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-APBI. VMAT plans were generated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions for 16 patients. Four treatment plans were developed and compared: a standard optimization (SO) plan without robust methods, a pseudo-skin flash strategy using a 5 mm VB (with densities of 0.4 and 1.0 g/cm3, VB04 and VB10), and a robust optimization (RO) plan to minimize penalties in worst-case scenarios. The isocenter was shifted 1-5 mm in each translational direction in robust analysis, and perturbed dose calculations were performed. All dose constraints for the target in SO and VB plans were within acceptable limits, but the dose evaluation volume V95% in the RO plan was lower than in other plans (P < 0.05). The clinical target volume V95% of the RO plan was significantly higher than in VB04 and VB10 (P < 0.05). The RO plan showed the best performance for organs at risk, followed by SO and VB plans, which resulted in higher doses. The RO plan exhibited the smallest change (±2%) in dose distribution due to respiratory motion. By contrast, the SO plan lacked robustness owing to absence of sufficient fluence in the air surrounding the planning target volume outside of the skin surface. The RO plan offers superior target coverage, maximum dose, and robustness compared to SO and VB methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"185-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932346/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A robust planning approach for respiratory motion in accelerated partial breast irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative treatment for early-stage breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the virtual bolus (VB) method and robust planning against respiratory motion in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-APBI. VMAT plans were generated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions for 16 patients. Four treatment plans were developed and compared: a standard optimization (SO) plan without robust methods, a pseudo-skin flash strategy using a 5 mm VB (with densities of 0.4 and 1.0 g/cm3, VB04 and VB10), and a robust optimization (RO) plan to minimize penalties in worst-case scenarios. The isocenter was shifted 1-5 mm in each translational direction in robust analysis, and perturbed dose calculations were performed. All dose constraints for the target in SO and VB plans were within acceptable limits, but the dose evaluation volume V95% in the RO plan was lower than in other plans (P < 0.05). The clinical target volume V95% of the RO plan was significantly higher than in VB04 and VB10 (P < 0.05). The RO plan showed the best performance for organs at risk, followed by SO and VB plans, which resulted in higher doses. The RO plan exhibited the smallest change (±2%) in dose distribution due to respiratory motion. By contrast, the SO plan lacked robustness owing to absence of sufficient fluence in the air surrounding the planning target volume outside of the skin surface. The RO plan offers superior target coverage, maximum dose, and robustness compared to SO and VB methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO).
Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal.
Articles considered fall into two broad categories:
Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable.
Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences.
Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry.
The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.