在正畸治疗中拔除前磨牙不会对上气道容积和最小横截面积产生负面影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Spyridon N Papageorgiou, Maria Zyli, Alexandra K Papadopoulou
{"title":"在正畸治疗中拔除前磨牙不会对上气道容积和最小横截面积产生负面影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Spyridon N Papageorgiou, Maria Zyli, Alexandra K Papadopoulou","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjaf012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extraction of premolars is usually prescribed for the orthodontic treatment of cases with inadequate space within the dental arch or when anterior teeth retraction is indicated; however, it has been advocated that this treatment approach could negatively influence the airways.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and critically appraise studies of premolar extractions during orthodontic treatment on upper airway dimensions. Search methods: Electronic unrestricted searches in nine databases until October 2024. Selection criteria: Clinical studies on humans comparing comprehensive orthodontic treatment with versus without the extraction of premolars using cone-beam computed tomography to assess upper airway volume or minimum cross-sectional area (minCSA). Data collection and analysis: After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment according to Cochrane, random-effects meta-analyses of Mean Differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed, followed by subgroup/meta-regression analyses and assessment of the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve papers corresponding to 11 unique retrospective non-randomized studies were included, covering 891 patients (35.8% male; 20.0 years-old on average). No statistically significant differences in the effect of orthodontic treatment on the volume of the nasopharynx, palatopharynx, glossopharynx, oropharynx or oral cavity were seen between patients treated with versus without premolar extractions (P > .05). Similarly, no significant differences were seen between extraction and non-extraction patients in terms of minCSA of the nasopharynx, palatopharynx, or glossopharynx (P > .05). On the contrary, patients treated with premolar extractions showed increased minCSA of the oropharynx compared to those treated without premolar extractions (4 studies; MD = 23.00 mm2; 95% CI = 10.74-35.26 mm2; P = .009). No significant effects from patient age, sex, or equivalence of the extraction/non-extraction groups were found, while the strength of evidence was moderate in all cases due to the inclusion of non-randomized studies with high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited evidence of moderate strength indicates that, on average, premolar extractions during comprehensive orthodontic treatment have little to no effect on the volume and minCSA of the airways.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42024621355.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraction of premolars in orthodontic treatment does not negatively affect upper airway volume and minimum cross-sectional area: a systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Spyridon N Papageorgiou, Maria Zyli, Alexandra K Papadopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejo/cjaf012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extraction of premolars is usually prescribed for the orthodontic treatment of cases with inadequate space within the dental arch or when anterior teeth retraction is indicated; however, it has been advocated that this treatment approach could negatively influence the airways.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and critically appraise studies of premolar extractions during orthodontic treatment on upper airway dimensions. Search methods: Electronic unrestricted searches in nine databases until October 2024. Selection criteria: Clinical studies on humans comparing comprehensive orthodontic treatment with versus without the extraction of premolars using cone-beam computed tomography to assess upper airway volume or minimum cross-sectional area (minCSA). Data collection and analysis: After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment according to Cochrane, random-effects meta-analyses of Mean Differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed, followed by subgroup/meta-regression analyses and assessment of the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve papers corresponding to 11 unique retrospective non-randomized studies were included, covering 891 patients (35.8% male; 20.0 years-old on average). No statistically significant differences in the effect of orthodontic treatment on the volume of the nasopharynx, palatopharynx, glossopharynx, oropharynx or oral cavity were seen between patients treated with versus without premolar extractions (P > .05). Similarly, no significant differences were seen between extraction and non-extraction patients in terms of minCSA of the nasopharynx, palatopharynx, or glossopharynx (P > .05). On the contrary, patients treated with premolar extractions showed increased minCSA of the oropharynx compared to those treated without premolar extractions (4 studies; MD = 23.00 mm2; 95% CI = 10.74-35.26 mm2; P = .009). No significant effects from patient age, sex, or equivalence of the extraction/non-extraction groups were found, while the strength of evidence was moderate in all cases due to the inclusion of non-randomized studies with high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited evidence of moderate strength indicates that, on average, premolar extractions during comprehensive orthodontic treatment have little to no effect on the volume and minCSA of the airways.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42024621355.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891658/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaf012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前磨牙的拔除通常用于牙弓内空间不足的病例或指征前牙退缩的正畸治疗;然而,有人认为这种治疗方法可能对气道产生负面影响。目的:鉴别和批判性评价正畸治疗中前臼齿拔除对上气道尺寸的影响。检索方式:截止到2024年10月,在9个数据库中进行电子无限制检索。选择标准:人类临床研究比较综合正畸治疗与不拔除前磨牙,使用锥束计算机断层扫描评估上呼吸道体积或最小横截面积(minCSA)。数据收集和分析:根据Cochrane进行重复研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估后,进行随机效应平均差异(MD)及其95%置信区间(CI)的meta分析,然后进行亚组/meta回归分析和证据质量评估。结果:纳入12篇论文,对应11项独特的回顾性非随机研究,共纳入891例患者(男性35.8%;平均年龄20.0岁)。正畸治疗对鼻咽部、腭咽部、舌咽部、口咽部和口腔体积的影响与未拔除前磨牙的患者无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。同样,拔牙患者与未拔牙患者在鼻咽、腭咽或舌咽部的minCSA方面也没有显著差异(P < 0.05)。相反,与未拔除前磨牙的患者相比,接受前磨牙拔除治疗的患者口咽的minCSA增加(4项研究;MD = 23.00 mm2;95% CI = 10.74-35.26 mm2;p = .009)。未发现患者年龄、性别或提取组/非提取组的等效性有显著影响,但由于纳入了具有高偏倚风险的非随机研究,所有病例的证据强度均为中等。结论:中等强度的有限证据表明,在综合正畸治疗中,平均而言,前磨牙拔除对气道的体积和最小csa几乎没有影响。注册:CRD42024621355。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Extraction of premolars in orthodontic treatment does not negatively affect upper airway volume and minimum cross-sectional area: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Extraction of premolars in orthodontic treatment does not negatively affect upper airway volume and minimum cross-sectional area: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Extraction of premolars in orthodontic treatment does not negatively affect upper airway volume and minimum cross-sectional area: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Extraction of premolars in orthodontic treatment does not negatively affect upper airway volume and minimum cross-sectional area: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Background: Extraction of premolars is usually prescribed for the orthodontic treatment of cases with inadequate space within the dental arch or when anterior teeth retraction is indicated; however, it has been advocated that this treatment approach could negatively influence the airways.

Objective: To identify and critically appraise studies of premolar extractions during orthodontic treatment on upper airway dimensions. Search methods: Electronic unrestricted searches in nine databases until October 2024. Selection criteria: Clinical studies on humans comparing comprehensive orthodontic treatment with versus without the extraction of premolars using cone-beam computed tomography to assess upper airway volume or minimum cross-sectional area (minCSA). Data collection and analysis: After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment according to Cochrane, random-effects meta-analyses of Mean Differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed, followed by subgroup/meta-regression analyses and assessment of the quality of evidence.

Results: Twelve papers corresponding to 11 unique retrospective non-randomized studies were included, covering 891 patients (35.8% male; 20.0 years-old on average). No statistically significant differences in the effect of orthodontic treatment on the volume of the nasopharynx, palatopharynx, glossopharynx, oropharynx or oral cavity were seen between patients treated with versus without premolar extractions (P > .05). Similarly, no significant differences were seen between extraction and non-extraction patients in terms of minCSA of the nasopharynx, palatopharynx, or glossopharynx (P > .05). On the contrary, patients treated with premolar extractions showed increased minCSA of the oropharynx compared to those treated without premolar extractions (4 studies; MD = 23.00 mm2; 95% CI = 10.74-35.26 mm2; P = .009). No significant effects from patient age, sex, or equivalence of the extraction/non-extraction groups were found, while the strength of evidence was moderate in all cases due to the inclusion of non-randomized studies with high risk of bias.

Conclusions: Limited evidence of moderate strength indicates that, on average, premolar extractions during comprehensive orthodontic treatment have little to no effect on the volume and minCSA of the airways.

Registration: CRD42024621355.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信