PRISm是COPD发展的重要危险因素,在非吸烟者中也是如此。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.025
Helena Backman, Tomi Myrberg, Linnea Hedman, Caroline Stridsman, Eva Rönmark, Anne Lindberg
{"title":"PRISm是COPD发展的重要危险因素,在非吸烟者中也是如此。","authors":"Helena Backman, Tomi Myrberg, Linnea Hedman, Caroline Stridsman, Eva Rönmark, Anne Lindberg","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COPD largely is underdiagnosed. Active identification of cases is crucial to establish preventive measures before manifestation of clinical disease. The significance of different spirometric patterns preceding COPD, especially preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) findings, has been highlighted but remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Which clinical characteristics, smoking habits, and spirometric patterns, with primary focus on PRISm findings, precede the development of airway obstruction (AO)?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The OLIN COPD COPD Study was established from 2002 through 2004. After re-examination of population-based cohorts, individuals with AO (n = 993; FEV<sub>1</sub> to VC ratio < 0.70) were identified together with control participants with nonobstructive findings (n = 993; FEV<sub>1</sub> to VC ratio ≥ 0.70). Most of these people had participated in examinations during the 1980s or 1990s, and in total, 902 patients and 819 control participants had previous clinical data. Logistic regression was performed with case status as outcome and spirometric patterns, age, sex, smoking habits, and BMI at first examination as covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) person-years between first examination and inclusion in the OLIN COPD COPD Study was 10.5 (4.0) years. At first examination, the prevalence of PRISm findings was higher in patients (18.6%) vs control participants (13.4%). Current smoking was more common in patients (45.1% vs 18.2%), whereas former smoking was similar (31.8% vs 34.9%). Patients reported more respiratory symptoms (78.0% vs 44.3%) than control participants. At first examination, PRISm findings, current smoking, and former smoking were associated strongly with becoming a case when adjusted for confounders, with adjusted OR (aOR) of 3.5, 4.1, and 1.5, respectively. When stratifying for smoking habits, aORs for PRISm findings in those with current smoking, former smoking, and never smoking status were 2.9, 3.8 and 3.7, respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>PRISm findings are associated with transition into AO corresponding to COPD within 1 decade, independent of smoking habits and with similar strength of association among those who have never smoked, who formerly smoked, and who currently smoke.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry Is an Important Risk Factor for Development of COPD, Also in Those Who Do Not Smoke.\",\"authors\":\"Helena Backman, Tomi Myrberg, Linnea Hedman, Caroline Stridsman, Eva Rönmark, Anne Lindberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COPD largely is underdiagnosed. Active identification of cases is crucial to establish preventive measures before manifestation of clinical disease. The significance of different spirometric patterns preceding COPD, especially preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) findings, has been highlighted but remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Which clinical characteristics, smoking habits, and spirometric patterns, with primary focus on PRISm findings, precede the development of airway obstruction (AO)?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The OLIN COPD COPD Study was established from 2002 through 2004. After re-examination of population-based cohorts, individuals with AO (n = 993; FEV<sub>1</sub> to VC ratio < 0.70) were identified together with control participants with nonobstructive findings (n = 993; FEV<sub>1</sub> to VC ratio ≥ 0.70). Most of these people had participated in examinations during the 1980s or 1990s, and in total, 902 patients and 819 control participants had previous clinical data. Logistic regression was performed with case status as outcome and spirometric patterns, age, sex, smoking habits, and BMI at first examination as covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) person-years between first examination and inclusion in the OLIN COPD COPD Study was 10.5 (4.0) years. At first examination, the prevalence of PRISm findings was higher in patients (18.6%) vs control participants (13.4%). Current smoking was more common in patients (45.1% vs 18.2%), whereas former smoking was similar (31.8% vs 34.9%). Patients reported more respiratory symptoms (78.0% vs 44.3%) than control participants. At first examination, PRISm findings, current smoking, and former smoking were associated strongly with becoming a case when adjusted for confounders, with adjusted OR (aOR) of 3.5, 4.1, and 1.5, respectively. When stratifying for smoking habits, aORs for PRISm findings in those with current smoking, former smoking, and never smoking status were 2.9, 3.8 and 3.7, respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>PRISm findings are associated with transition into AO corresponding to COPD within 1 decade, independent of smoking habits and with similar strength of association among those who have never smoked, who formerly smoked, and who currently smoke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)在很大程度上未被诊断。积极发现病例是在临床疾病表现之前制定预防措施的关键。COPD前不同肺活量测定模式的重要性,尤其是保留比受损肺活量测定(PRISm),已得到强调,但仍不清楚。研究问题:哪些临床特征、吸烟习惯和肺活量测定模式(主要关注PRISm)先于气道阻塞的发展?研究设计和方法:OLIN COPD COPD研究建立于2002-04年。在重新检查基于人群的队列后,气道阻塞(AO)个体(n=993例,FEV1/VC1/VC≥0.70)。其中大多数人在20世纪80年代或90年代参加过检查,共有902例病例和819例对照者有先前的临床资料。以病例为结果,以肺活量模式、年龄、性别、吸烟习惯和首次检查时的体重指数(BMI)为协变量,进行Logistic回归。结果:从首次检查到纳入OLIN COPD COPD研究的平均人年为10.5±4.0年。首次检查时,病例中PRISm的患病率(18.6%)高于对照组(13.4%)。目前吸烟的病例更常见(45.1%对18.2%),而以前吸烟的病例相似(31.8%对34.9%)。病例报告的呼吸道症状多于对照组(78.0比44.3%)。首次检查时,校正混杂因素后,PRISm、当前吸烟和曾经吸烟与成为病例有很强的相关性,调整后的OR (aOR)分别为3.5、4.1和1.5。在对吸烟习惯进行分层时,目前吸烟者、曾经吸烟者和非吸烟者的PRISm的aORs分别为2.9、3.8和3.7。解释:PRISm与10年内转变为COPD对应的气道阻塞相关,独立于吸烟习惯,并且在非吸烟者、戒烟者和当前吸烟者中具有相似的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry Is an Important Risk Factor for Development of COPD, Also in Those Who Do Not Smoke.

Background: COPD largely is underdiagnosed. Active identification of cases is crucial to establish preventive measures before manifestation of clinical disease. The significance of different spirometric patterns preceding COPD, especially preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) findings, has been highlighted but remains unclear.

Research question: Which clinical characteristics, smoking habits, and spirometric patterns, with primary focus on PRISm findings, precede the development of airway obstruction (AO)?

Study design and methods: The OLIN COPD COPD Study was established from 2002 through 2004. After re-examination of population-based cohorts, individuals with AO (n = 993; FEV1 to VC ratio < 0.70) were identified together with control participants with nonobstructive findings (n = 993; FEV1 to VC ratio ≥ 0.70). Most of these people had participated in examinations during the 1980s or 1990s, and in total, 902 patients and 819 control participants had previous clinical data. Logistic regression was performed with case status as outcome and spirometric patterns, age, sex, smoking habits, and BMI at first examination as covariates.

Results: The mean (SD) person-years between first examination and inclusion in the OLIN COPD COPD Study was 10.5 (4.0) years. At first examination, the prevalence of PRISm findings was higher in patients (18.6%) vs control participants (13.4%). Current smoking was more common in patients (45.1% vs 18.2%), whereas former smoking was similar (31.8% vs 34.9%). Patients reported more respiratory symptoms (78.0% vs 44.3%) than control participants. At first examination, PRISm findings, current smoking, and former smoking were associated strongly with becoming a case when adjusted for confounders, with adjusted OR (aOR) of 3.5, 4.1, and 1.5, respectively. When stratifying for smoking habits, aORs for PRISm findings in those with current smoking, former smoking, and never smoking status were 2.9, 3.8 and 3.7, respectively.

Interpretation: PRISm findings are associated with transition into AO corresponding to COPD within 1 decade, independent of smoking habits and with similar strength of association among those who have never smoked, who formerly smoked, and who currently smoke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信