在紧急初级保健中使用高灵敏度即时检测一小时肌钙蛋白:OUT-POC试点研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1159/000545127
Tonje R Johannessen, Odd Martin Vallersnes, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp, Sigrun Halvorsen, Dan Atar
{"title":"在紧急初级保健中使用高灵敏度即时检测一小时肌钙蛋白:OUT-POC试点研究","authors":"Tonje R Johannessen, Odd Martin Vallersnes, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp, Sigrun Halvorsen, Dan Atar","doi":"10.1159/000545127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Novel point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) tests could enhance acute myocardial infarction (MI) assessment outside hospital. This pilot study evaluates the efficacy, feasibility, and precision of the QuidelOrtho TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay when used by non-laboratory personnel in emergency primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective pilot study was conducted from April to June 2024 at the main emergency primary care clinic in Oslo, Norway. Patients ≥18 years with acute nontraumatic chest pain were eligible. The 0/1-h diagnostic algorithms for the POC TriageTrue hs-cTnI and the Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT central laboratory assay (routine protocol) were compared to assess the efficacy and potential safety issues for patients triaged to MI rule-out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 2 months, 199 patients (median age 54 years [interquartile range 45-70]; 52.8% female) were included. Five (2.5%) patients were hospitalised with acute MI. After a single hs-cTnI measurement, the POC algorithm categorised more patients to direct rule-out than the hs-cTnT assay (65% vs. 32%). The rule-out efficacy was similar for both assays after adding the 1-hour measurement (hs-cTnT 74%; POC hs-cTnI 73%). Device-related error rates were low (0.5%), with high reproducibility and repeatability (coefficients of variation < 10%) when performed by non-laboratory personnel.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 0/1-h algorithm for the TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay appears efficient, feasible, and robust when applied by personnel without laboratory expertise in an emergency primary care setting. Further research is warranted, but given the high proportion of single-sample rule-out cases, 1-h measurements could likely be avoided, improving patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-Hour Troponin Using a High-Sensitivity Point-of-Care Assay in Emergency Primary Care: The OUT-POC Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tonje R Johannessen, Odd Martin Vallersnes, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp, Sigrun Halvorsen, Dan Atar\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Novel point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) tests could enhance acute myocardial infarction (MI) assessment outside hospital. This pilot study evaluates the efficacy, feasibility, and precision of the QuidelOrtho TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay when used by non-laboratory personnel in emergency primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective pilot study was conducted from April to June 2024 at the main emergency primary care clinic in Oslo, Norway. Patients ≥18 years with acute nontraumatic chest pain were eligible. The 0/1-h diagnostic algorithms for the POC TriageTrue hs-cTnI and the Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT central laboratory assay (routine protocol) were compared to assess the efficacy and potential safety issues for patients triaged to MI rule-out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 2 months, 199 patients (median age 54 years [interquartile range 45-70]; 52.8% female) were included. Five (2.5%) patients were hospitalised with acute MI. After a single hs-cTnI measurement, the POC algorithm categorised more patients to direct rule-out than the hs-cTnT assay (65% vs. 32%). The rule-out efficacy was similar for both assays after adding the 1-hour measurement (hs-cTnT 74%; POC hs-cTnI 73%). Device-related error rates were low (0.5%), with high reproducibility and repeatability (coefficients of variation < 10%) when performed by non-laboratory personnel.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 0/1-h algorithm for the TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay appears efficient, feasible, and robust when applied by personnel without laboratory expertise in an emergency primary care setting. Further research is warranted, but given the high proportion of single-sample rule-out cases, 1-h measurements could likely be avoided, improving patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新型的即时护理(POC)高灵敏度心肌肌钙蛋白(hs-cTn)检测可增强院外急性心肌梗死(MI)的评估。本初步研究评估了魁地ortho TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC测定在非实验室人员用于紧急初级保健时的有效性、可行性和准确性。方法于2024年4月至6月在挪威奥斯陆主要急诊初级保健诊所进行前瞻性试点研究。≥18岁急性非外伤性胸痛患者入选。比较POC TriageTrue hs-cTnI和Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT中心实验室检测(常规方案)的0/1小时诊断算法,以评估诊断为心肌梗死排除的患者的有效性和潜在安全性问题。结果2个月来,199例患者(中位年龄54岁(IQR 45-70);52.8%为女性)。5名患者(2.5%)因急性心肌梗死住院。在单次hs-cTnI检测后,POC算法比hs-cTnT检测将更多的患者分类为直接排除(65%对32%)。在加入1小时测量后,两种检测方法的排除效果相似(hs-cTnT 74%;POC hs-cTnI 73%)。器械相关错误率低(0.5%),具有高再现性和可重复性(变异系数)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One-Hour Troponin Using a High-Sensitivity Point-of-Care Assay in Emergency Primary Care: The OUT-POC Pilot Study.

Introduction: Novel point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) tests could enhance acute myocardial infarction (MI) assessment outside hospital. This pilot study evaluates the efficacy, feasibility, and precision of the QuidelOrtho TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay when used by non-laboratory personnel in emergency primary care.

Methods: A prospective pilot study was conducted from April to June 2024 at the main emergency primary care clinic in Oslo, Norway. Patients ≥18 years with acute nontraumatic chest pain were eligible. The 0/1-h diagnostic algorithms for the POC TriageTrue hs-cTnI and the Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT central laboratory assay (routine protocol) were compared to assess the efficacy and potential safety issues for patients triaged to MI rule-out.

Results: Over 2 months, 199 patients (median age 54 years [interquartile range 45-70]; 52.8% female) were included. Five (2.5%) patients were hospitalised with acute MI. After a single hs-cTnI measurement, the POC algorithm categorised more patients to direct rule-out than the hs-cTnT assay (65% vs. 32%). The rule-out efficacy was similar for both assays after adding the 1-hour measurement (hs-cTnT 74%; POC hs-cTnI 73%). Device-related error rates were low (0.5%), with high reproducibility and repeatability (coefficients of variation < 10%) when performed by non-laboratory personnel.

Conclusion: The 0/1-h algorithm for the TriageTrue hs-cTnI POC assay appears efficient, feasible, and robust when applied by personnel without laboratory expertise in an emergency primary care setting. Further research is warranted, but given the high proportion of single-sample rule-out cases, 1-h measurements could likely be avoided, improving patient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信