早期子宫内膜癌淋巴血管腔浸润的演变:分层、量化和临床意义:一项系统综述。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hai-Yan Sun, Xu Wang, Li-Xian Wang, Qiu-Man Wang, Shan Kang
{"title":"早期子宫内膜癌淋巴血管腔浸润的演变:分层、量化和临床意义:一项系统综述。","authors":"Hai-Yan Sun, Xu Wang, Li-Xian Wang, Qiu-Man Wang, Shan Kang","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-07997-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endometrial carcinoma (EC) represents the most prevalent malignancy of the female genital tract in the United States, with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) recognized as a critical prognostic factor that significantly influences disease outcomes. This review aims to elucidate the evolving understanding of LVSI in early-stage EC, highlighting its implications for stratification, quantification, and clinical management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase/MEDLINE databases were performed for studies published from January 1, 1985, to November 16, 2024. Peer-reviewed articles that reported multivariable hazard ratios (HR) for LVSI in endometrial cancer were included, while meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports were excluded from analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6 studies involving 2,345 patients were included. The majority of the population was characterized by endometrioid histotype (85.7%) and classified as FIGO stage I (75.1%). LVSI was documented in 21.5% of cases, with 62.4% of patients receiving adjuvant treatment. The literature on LVSI was categorized into three thematic areas: stratification classifications, quantitative assessments, and guideline development, illustrating the progression from binary systems to more nuanced tiered classifications that enhance prognostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Foundational studies established LVSI as a significant risk factor in endometrial cancer, while subsequent research has refined its classification and quantification. However, inconsistencies in LVSI thresholds among current clinical guidelines pose challenges for standardization in practice. Addressing these discrepancies through future research, including multicenter studies and the integration of emerging technologies, is crucial for improving risk stratification and clinical management of endometrial carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: stratification, quantification, and clinical implications: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Hai-Yan Sun, Xu Wang, Li-Xian Wang, Qiu-Man Wang, Shan Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-025-07997-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endometrial carcinoma (EC) represents the most prevalent malignancy of the female genital tract in the United States, with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) recognized as a critical prognostic factor that significantly influences disease outcomes. This review aims to elucidate the evolving understanding of LVSI in early-stage EC, highlighting its implications for stratification, quantification, and clinical management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase/MEDLINE databases were performed for studies published from January 1, 1985, to November 16, 2024. Peer-reviewed articles that reported multivariable hazard ratios (HR) for LVSI in endometrial cancer were included, while meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports were excluded from analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6 studies involving 2,345 patients were included. The majority of the population was characterized by endometrioid histotype (85.7%) and classified as FIGO stage I (75.1%). LVSI was documented in 21.5% of cases, with 62.4% of patients receiving adjuvant treatment. The literature on LVSI was categorized into three thematic areas: stratification classifications, quantitative assessments, and guideline development, illustrating the progression from binary systems to more nuanced tiered classifications that enhance prognostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Foundational studies established LVSI as a significant risk factor in endometrial cancer, while subsequent research has refined its classification and quantification. However, inconsistencies in LVSI thresholds among current clinical guidelines pose challenges for standardization in practice. Addressing these discrepancies through future research, including multicenter studies and the integration of emerging technologies, is crucial for improving risk stratification and clinical management of endometrial carcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-07997-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-07997-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:子宫内膜癌(EC)是美国女性生殖道最常见的恶性肿瘤,淋巴血管间隙侵犯(LVSI)被认为是影响疾病结局的关键预后因素。这篇综述旨在阐明对早期EC中LVSI的不断发展的理解,强调其对分层、量化和临床管理的意义。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价。对1985年1月1日至2024年11月16日期间发表的研究进行了PubMed、Web of Science和Embase/MEDLINE数据库的综合检索。报告子宫内膜癌LVSI多变量风险比(HR)的同行评议文章被纳入,而荟萃分析、综述和病例报告被排除在分析之外。结果:共纳入6项研究,涉及2345例患者。大多数人群以子宫内膜样组织型为特征(85.7%),并被归类为FIGO I期(75.1%)。21.5%的病例发生LVSI, 62.4%的患者接受辅助治疗。关于LVSI的文献分为三个主题领域:分层分类、定量评估和指南制定,说明了从二元系统到更细致的分层分类的进展,从而提高了预后准确性。结论:基础研究确定LVSI是子宫内膜癌的重要危险因素,后续研究进一步完善了LVSI的分类和量化。然而,当前临床指南中LVSI阈值的不一致性对实践中的标准化提出了挑战。通过未来的研究,包括多中心研究和新兴技术的整合来解决这些差异,对于改善子宫内膜癌的风险分层和临床管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolution of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: stratification, quantification, and clinical implications: a systematic review.

Purpose: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) represents the most prevalent malignancy of the female genital tract in the United States, with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) recognized as a critical prognostic factor that significantly influences disease outcomes. This review aims to elucidate the evolving understanding of LVSI in early-stage EC, highlighting its implications for stratification, quantification, and clinical management.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase/MEDLINE databases were performed for studies published from January 1, 1985, to November 16, 2024. Peer-reviewed articles that reported multivariable hazard ratios (HR) for LVSI in endometrial cancer were included, while meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports were excluded from analysis.

Results: A total of 6 studies involving 2,345 patients were included. The majority of the population was characterized by endometrioid histotype (85.7%) and classified as FIGO stage I (75.1%). LVSI was documented in 21.5% of cases, with 62.4% of patients receiving adjuvant treatment. The literature on LVSI was categorized into three thematic areas: stratification classifications, quantitative assessments, and guideline development, illustrating the progression from binary systems to more nuanced tiered classifications that enhance prognostic accuracy.

Conclusion: Foundational studies established LVSI as a significant risk factor in endometrial cancer, while subsequent research has refined its classification and quantification. However, inconsistencies in LVSI thresholds among current clinical guidelines pose challenges for standardization in practice. Addressing these discrepancies through future research, including multicenter studies and the integration of emerging technologies, is crucial for improving risk stratification and clinical management of endometrial carcinoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信