IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
American journal of human genetics Pub Date : 2025-04-03 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.02.012
Patricia J Sullivan, Julian M W Quinn, Pamela Ajuyah, Mark Pinese, Ryan L Davis, Mark J Cowley
{"title":"Data-driven insights to inform splice-altering variant assessment.","authors":"Patricia J Sullivan, Julian M W Quinn, Pamela Ajuyah, Mark Pinese, Ryan L Davis, Mark J Cowley","doi":"10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disease-causing genetic variants often disrupt mRNA splicing, an intricate process that is incompletely understood. Thus, accurate inference of which genetic variants will affect splicing and what their functional consequences will be is challenging, particularly for variants outside of the essential splice sites. Here, we describe a set of data-driven heuristics that inform the interpretation of human splice-altering variants (SAVs) based on the analysis of annotated exons, experimentally validated SAVs, and the currently understood principles of splicing biology. We defined requisite splicing criteria by examining around 202,000 canonical protein-coding exons and 19,000 experimentally validated splicing branchpoints. This analysis defined the sequence, spacing, and motif strength required for splicing, with 95.9% of the exons examined meeting these criteria. By considering over 12,000 experimentally validated variants from the SpliceVarDB, we defined a set of heuristics that inform the evaluation of putative SAVs. To ensure the applicability of each heuristic, only those supported by at least 10 experimentally validated variants were considered. This allowed us to establish a measure of spliceogenicity: the proportion of variants at a location (or motif site) that affected splicing in a given context. This study makes considerable advances toward bridging the gap between computational predictions and the biological process of splicing, offering an evidence-based approach to identifying SAVs and evaluating their impact. Our splicing heuristics enhance the current framework for genetic variant evaluation with a robust, detailed, and comprehensible analysis by adding valuable context over traditional binary prediction tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":7659,"journal":{"name":"American journal of human genetics","volume":" ","pages":"764-778"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of human genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.02.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致病基因变异往往会破坏 mRNA 的剪接,而人们对这一错综复杂的过程尚不完全了解。因此,准确推断哪些基因变异会影响剪接及其功能性后果具有挑战性,尤其是对于重要剪接位点之外的变异。在此,我们介绍了一套数据驱动的启发式方法,根据对注释外显子的分析、实验验证的 SAVs 以及目前已知的剪接生物学原理,为解读人类剪接改变变异(SAVs)提供信息。我们通过研究约 202,000 个规范蛋白编码外显子和 19,000 个经实验验证的剪接分支点,定义了必要的剪接标准。这项分析确定了剪接所需的序列、间距和图案强度,其中 95.9% 的外显子符合这些标准。通过考虑 SpliceVarDB 中超过 12,000 个经过实验验证的变体,我们定义了一套启发式方法,用于评估推定的 SAV。为确保每个启发式的适用性,我们只考虑那些至少有 10 个实验验证变体支持的变体。这样,我们就能确定剪接致源性的衡量标准:在特定情况下影响剪接的位置(或图案位点)的变异比例。这项研究在弥合计算预测与剪接生物学过程之间的差距方面取得了重大进展,提供了一种基于证据的方法来识别 SAV 并评估其影响。与传统的二元预测工具相比,我们的剪接启发式方法增加了有价值的背景信息,从而以稳健、详细和易懂的分析增强了当前的遗传变异评估框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data-driven insights to inform splice-altering variant assessment.

Disease-causing genetic variants often disrupt mRNA splicing, an intricate process that is incompletely understood. Thus, accurate inference of which genetic variants will affect splicing and what their functional consequences will be is challenging, particularly for variants outside of the essential splice sites. Here, we describe a set of data-driven heuristics that inform the interpretation of human splice-altering variants (SAVs) based on the analysis of annotated exons, experimentally validated SAVs, and the currently understood principles of splicing biology. We defined requisite splicing criteria by examining around 202,000 canonical protein-coding exons and 19,000 experimentally validated splicing branchpoints. This analysis defined the sequence, spacing, and motif strength required for splicing, with 95.9% of the exons examined meeting these criteria. By considering over 12,000 experimentally validated variants from the SpliceVarDB, we defined a set of heuristics that inform the evaluation of putative SAVs. To ensure the applicability of each heuristic, only those supported by at least 10 experimentally validated variants were considered. This allowed us to establish a measure of spliceogenicity: the proportion of variants at a location (or motif site) that affected splicing in a given context. This study makes considerable advances toward bridging the gap between computational predictions and the biological process of splicing, offering an evidence-based approach to identifying SAVs and evaluating their impact. Our splicing heuristics enhance the current framework for genetic variant evaluation with a robust, detailed, and comprehensible analysis by adding valuable context over traditional binary prediction tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
4.10%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Human Genetics (AJHG) is a monthly journal published by Cell Press, chosen by The American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) as its premier publication starting from January 2008. AJHG represents Cell Press's first society-owned journal, and both ASHG and Cell Press anticipate significant synergies between AJHG content and that of other Cell Press titles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信