Jongrim Choi, Ihn Sook Jeong, Jae Sim Jeong, Jae Geum Ryu, Eun-Suk Park, Si Hyeon Han
{"title":"Use of automated room disinfection systems in the health care environment: A national survey.","authors":"Jongrim Choi, Ihn Sook Jeong, Jae Sim Jeong, Jae Geum Ryu, Eun-Suk Park, Si Hyeon Han","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automated room disinfection systems (ARDSs) have been increasingly adopted worldwide to address emerging infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This study aims to assess the current use of ARDSs in acute health care settings across South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide online survey was conducted in 150 tertiary general hospitals and identified the experiences of ARDS use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the hospitals surveyed, 32.7% used ultraviolet C (UV-C), 26.0% used aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP), and 15.3% used vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP). Most systems were adopted after the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. UV-C was mainly used in examination and isolation rooms, while aHP and vHP were used in isolation rooms. Satisfaction rates were 81.6% for UV-C, 76.9% for aHP, and 78.3% for vHP, with 91.3% to 94.9% of respondents intending to continue use. Barriers to adoption included high maintenance costs, uncertainty about UV-C efficacy, challenges with aHP systems, and high costs for vHP systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To increase the adoption of ARDSs, addressing high maintenance costs and confirming the disinfection efficacy of these systems is crucial. Enhancing convenience, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, and developing user guidelines and educational programs will be essential for the effective utilization of ARDSs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.03.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of automated room disinfection systems in the health care environment: A national survey.
Background: Automated room disinfection systems (ARDSs) have been increasingly adopted worldwide to address emerging infectious diseases and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This study aims to assess the current use of ARDSs in acute health care settings across South Korea.
Methods: A nationwide online survey was conducted in 150 tertiary general hospitals and identified the experiences of ARDS use.
Results: Among the hospitals surveyed, 32.7% used ultraviolet C (UV-C), 26.0% used aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP), and 15.3% used vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP). Most systems were adopted after the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. UV-C was mainly used in examination and isolation rooms, while aHP and vHP were used in isolation rooms. Satisfaction rates were 81.6% for UV-C, 76.9% for aHP, and 78.3% for vHP, with 91.3% to 94.9% of respondents intending to continue use. Barriers to adoption included high maintenance costs, uncertainty about UV-C efficacy, challenges with aHP systems, and high costs for vHP systems.
Conclusions: To increase the adoption of ARDSs, addressing high maintenance costs and confirming the disinfection efficacy of these systems is crucial. Enhancing convenience, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, and developing user guidelines and educational programs will be essential for the effective utilization of ARDSs.
期刊介绍:
AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)