IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
George G Kidess, Mohammad Hamza, Rohit Goru, Jawad Basit, Mowaffak Alraiyes, M Chadi Alraies
{"title":"The Impact of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Atrial Fibrillation Burden in Diabetic Patients.","authors":"George G Kidess, Mohammad Hamza, Rohit Goru, Jawad Basit, Mowaffak Alraiyes, M Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) are comorbid conditions associated with increased adverse outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that antidiabetic therapies such as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP1a) may influence the risk of AF and stroke differently. This study aims to compare the risk of new-onset AF and stroke in T2DM patients treated with SGLT2i versus GLP1a. A systematic literature review was performed on Pubmed and Embase, including studies comparing the effect of SGLT2i or GLP1a on new-onset AF and stroke incidence in T2DM patients. A random effects model was used to pool relative risk and 95% confidence intervals to assess the study outcomes. Univariate metaregression analysis was performed for selected demographics and comorbidities. Six observational studies were included in the analysis comprising 847,028 patients. Our meta-analysis found a significantly lower risk of new-onset AF in patients with T2DM treated with SGLT2i compared to those receiving GLP1a (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.89). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of stroke between SGLT2i and GLP1a (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.21). Univariate meta-regression indicated male sex was a significant negative effect modifier for new-onset AF (coefficient = -0.0191, p-value = 0.0158). In conclusion, SGLT2i may reduce AF risk in T2DM patients, while GLP1a may provide a modest, nonsignificant protective effect against stroke. Further research is needed to confirm these results and guide cardiovascular risk management in patients with T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.03.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心房颤动(房颤)和 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)是与不良后果增加相关的合并症。最近的证据表明,钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1激动剂(GLP1a)等抗糖尿病疗法可能会对房颤和中风的风险产生不同的影响。本研究旨在比较接受 SGLT2i 和 GLP1a 治疗的 T2DM 患者新发房颤和中风的风险。在 Pubmed 和 Embase 上进行了系统性文献综述,包括比较 SGLT2i 或 GLP1a 对 T2DM 患者新发房颤和中风发病率影响的研究。采用随机效应模型汇集相对风险和 95% 置信区间来评估研究结果。对选定的人口统计学和合并症进行了单变量元回归分析。分析共纳入了六项观察性研究,包括 847,028 名患者。我们的荟萃分析发现,接受 SGLT2i 治疗的 T2DM 患者与接受 GLP1a 治疗的患者相比,新发房颤的风险明显降低(RR=0.76,95% CI:0.65-0.89)。SGLT2i 和 GLP1a 的中风风险差异无统计学意义(RR=1.09,95% CI=0.98-1.21)。单变量元回归显示,男性性别是新发房颤的一个显著负效应修饰因子(系数=-0.0191,P值=0.0158)。总之,SGLT2i 可降低 T2DM 患者的房颤风险,而 GLP1a 可对中风起到适度、非显著的保护作用。要证实这些结果并指导 T2DM 患者的心血管风险管理,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Atrial Fibrillation Burden in Diabetic Patients.

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) are comorbid conditions associated with increased adverse outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that antidiabetic therapies such as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP1a) may influence the risk of AF and stroke differently. This study aims to compare the risk of new-onset AF and stroke in T2DM patients treated with SGLT2i versus GLP1a. A systematic literature review was performed on Pubmed and Embase, including studies comparing the effect of SGLT2i or GLP1a on new-onset AF and stroke incidence in T2DM patients. A random effects model was used to pool relative risk and 95% confidence intervals to assess the study outcomes. Univariate metaregression analysis was performed for selected demographics and comorbidities. Six observational studies were included in the analysis comprising 847,028 patients. Our meta-analysis found a significantly lower risk of new-onset AF in patients with T2DM treated with SGLT2i compared to those receiving GLP1a (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.89). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of stroke between SGLT2i and GLP1a (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.21). Univariate meta-regression indicated male sex was a significant negative effect modifier for new-onset AF (coefficient = -0.0191, p-value = 0.0158). In conclusion, SGLT2i may reduce AF risk in T2DM patients, while GLP1a may provide a modest, nonsignificant protective effect against stroke. Further research is needed to confirm these results and guide cardiovascular risk management in patients with T2DM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信