Bibliometric Indexes - Advantages and Limitations in Practical Application, for the Scientific Validity of Authors and Their Scientific Contents - Stanford Bibliometric List: Truths and Misconceptions.

Background: The scientific researchers have the role of interacting through published articles in scientific journals or presentations at scientific and professional conferences where they can affect the practices that can make achievements to society and country. or worldwide.

Objective: The aim of this article was to describe bibliometric indexes and explained its importance for its evaluation and measuring quality assessment of published papers in scientific journals and advantages and disadvantages of current bibliometric portals for creating the list of universities and its academic staff by counts of deposited articles in databases and number of its citations.

Methods: The author searched the most influential online databases and analyzed deposited papers by bibliometric indexes, and used a descriptive method to review important facts about bibliometrics experiences in scientific and academic practice. The author used facts deposited on the main international portals for analyzing number of citations of deposited scientific papers on Scopus and Google Scholar platform-h-Index and i10-Index and number of citations as basic data for created top list of most citated scientists in almost of all countries in the world.

Results and discussion: Bibliometric methods are used for quantitative analysis of written materials. Citation is influenced by: article quality, understanding of the article, language in which the article is written, loyalty to a group of researchers, article type, etc. Some indicators used in evaluating scientific work are Impact factor (IF); Citation of the article; Journal citations; Number and order of authors, etc. The index factor of influence depends on the quality of the journal, the language in which it was printed, the area it covers, and the journal distribution system. The portals and its platforms: Webometrics, "AD Scientific Index" and Stanford Bibliometric List are not fully relevant for measuring quality assessment of universities and its academic staff.

Conclusion: Current academies and academicians can propose criteria how improve indexing scientific papers with the consultation of scientific bodies and experts at universities in one country, selected regions, or worldwide. These criteria should be necessary for quality assessment of the scientific curriculum of scientists and their published papers in scientific journals.