生物炭与粉状矿渣在混凝土中的复合掺合研究。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rajvardhan Kallimani, Pravin Minde
{"title":"生物炭与粉状矿渣在混凝土中的复合掺合研究。","authors":"Rajvardhan Kallimani,&nbsp;Pravin Minde","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36210-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Concrete is the most used material globally, with cement production causing 8% of emissions. Waste-based supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) offer a partial cement replacement to address climate goals. The present study explores using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) and biochar as SCMs to elevate concrete’s sustainability while maintaining structural performance. GGBS, sourced from steel production, was used at 20% and 40%, while biochar, derived from wood waste through pyrolysis, was incorporated at 3%, 4%, and 5% by weight of cement. The effects of these replacements were evaluated through compressive strength tests at 7 and 28 days, as well as microstructural analyses employing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis. Findings revealed that GGBS enhanced workability due to its finer particles and pozzolanic activity while aiding long-term strength development. However, including biochar, particularly at higher percentages, led to a reduction in compressive strength, attributed to its porous structure and high carbon content, which weakened the interfacial transition zones (ITZ) and increased voids in the matrix. SEM analysis confirmed the highly porous nature of biochar, which interfered with the formation of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S–H), while EDAX showed a significant presence of carbon in biochar and GGBS, further explaining the dilution of strength. At 7 days, the compressive strength of concrete decreased by 29.4% (22.84 MPa) for 20% GGBS with 3% biochar, and up to 52.1% (15.49 MPa) for 40% GGBS with 5% biochar, compared to the control mix (32.34 MPa). At 28 days, the reduction ranged from 26.7% (25.02 MPa) for 20% GGBS with 4% biochar to 54.6% (15.49 MPa) for 40% GGBS with 5% biochar, relative to the control mix (34.14 MPa). Despite the reduction in early strength, the GGBS and biochar blends offer promise for applications focused on long-term durability and sustainability. This research highlights the need for careful optimization of mix proportions to find a middle ground between environmental benefits and mechanical performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"32 13","pages":"8201 - 8218"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation on combined use of biochar and ground granulated blast furnace slag as a supplementary admixture in concrete\",\"authors\":\"Rajvardhan Kallimani,&nbsp;Pravin Minde\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-025-36210-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Concrete is the most used material globally, with cement production causing 8% of emissions. Waste-based supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) offer a partial cement replacement to address climate goals. The present study explores using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) and biochar as SCMs to elevate concrete’s sustainability while maintaining structural performance. GGBS, sourced from steel production, was used at 20% and 40%, while biochar, derived from wood waste through pyrolysis, was incorporated at 3%, 4%, and 5% by weight of cement. The effects of these replacements were evaluated through compressive strength tests at 7 and 28 days, as well as microstructural analyses employing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis. Findings revealed that GGBS enhanced workability due to its finer particles and pozzolanic activity while aiding long-term strength development. However, including biochar, particularly at higher percentages, led to a reduction in compressive strength, attributed to its porous structure and high carbon content, which weakened the interfacial transition zones (ITZ) and increased voids in the matrix. SEM analysis confirmed the highly porous nature of biochar, which interfered with the formation of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S–H), while EDAX showed a significant presence of carbon in biochar and GGBS, further explaining the dilution of strength. At 7 days, the compressive strength of concrete decreased by 29.4% (22.84 MPa) for 20% GGBS with 3% biochar, and up to 52.1% (15.49 MPa) for 40% GGBS with 5% biochar, compared to the control mix (32.34 MPa). At 28 days, the reduction ranged from 26.7% (25.02 MPa) for 20% GGBS with 4% biochar to 54.6% (15.49 MPa) for 40% GGBS with 5% biochar, relative to the control mix (34.14 MPa). Despite the reduction in early strength, the GGBS and biochar blends offer promise for applications focused on long-term durability and sustainability. This research highlights the need for careful optimization of mix proportions to find a middle ground between environmental benefits and mechanical performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\"32 13\",\"pages\":\"8201 - 8218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36210-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36210-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混凝土是全球使用最多的材料,水泥生产造成了8%的排放。基于废物的补充胶凝材料(SCMs)为实现气候目标提供了部分水泥替代品。本研究探讨了使用矿渣粉和生物炭作为SCMs来提高混凝土的可持续性,同时保持结构性能。来自钢铁生产的GGBS的用量分别为20%和40%,而通过热解从木材废料中提取的生物炭的用量分别为水泥重量的3%、4%和5%。通过7天和28天的抗压强度测试,以及使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散x射线分析的微观结构分析,评估了这些替代品的效果。研究结果表明,由于GGBS具有更细的颗粒和火山灰活性,从而增强了和易性,同时有助于长期强度的发展。然而,加入生物炭,特别是当生物炭含量较高时,由于其多孔结构和高碳含量,导致抗压强度降低,从而削弱了界面过渡区(ITZ),增加了基质中的空隙。SEM分析证实了生物炭的高多孔性,这干扰了水合硅酸钙(C-S-H)的形成,而EDAX显示生物炭和GGBS中存在大量碳,进一步解释了强度稀释的原因。在第7天,与对照(32.34 MPa)相比,20% GGBS和3%生物炭的混凝土抗压强度下降了29.4% (22.84 MPa), 40% GGBS和5%生物炭的混凝土抗压强度下降了52.1% (15.49 MPa)。28 d时,与对照(34.14 MPa)相比,20% GGBS加4%生物炭降低了26.7% (25.02 MPa), 40% GGBS加5%生物炭降低了54.6% (15.49 MPa)。尽管早期强度降低,但GGBS和生物炭混合物为注重长期耐久性和可持续性的应用提供了希望。这项研究强调需要仔细优化混合比例,在环境效益和机械性能之间找到一个中间地带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigation on combined use of biochar and ground granulated blast furnace slag as a supplementary admixture in concrete

Investigation on combined use of biochar and ground granulated blast furnace slag as a supplementary admixture in concrete

Concrete is the most used material globally, with cement production causing 8% of emissions. Waste-based supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) offer a partial cement replacement to address climate goals. The present study explores using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) and biochar as SCMs to elevate concrete’s sustainability while maintaining structural performance. GGBS, sourced from steel production, was used at 20% and 40%, while biochar, derived from wood waste through pyrolysis, was incorporated at 3%, 4%, and 5% by weight of cement. The effects of these replacements were evaluated through compressive strength tests at 7 and 28 days, as well as microstructural analyses employing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis. Findings revealed that GGBS enhanced workability due to its finer particles and pozzolanic activity while aiding long-term strength development. However, including biochar, particularly at higher percentages, led to a reduction in compressive strength, attributed to its porous structure and high carbon content, which weakened the interfacial transition zones (ITZ) and increased voids in the matrix. SEM analysis confirmed the highly porous nature of biochar, which interfered with the formation of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S–H), while EDAX showed a significant presence of carbon in biochar and GGBS, further explaining the dilution of strength. At 7 days, the compressive strength of concrete decreased by 29.4% (22.84 MPa) for 20% GGBS with 3% biochar, and up to 52.1% (15.49 MPa) for 40% GGBS with 5% biochar, compared to the control mix (32.34 MPa). At 28 days, the reduction ranged from 26.7% (25.02 MPa) for 20% GGBS with 4% biochar to 54.6% (15.49 MPa) for 40% GGBS with 5% biochar, relative to the control mix (34.14 MPa). Despite the reduction in early strength, the GGBS and biochar blends offer promise for applications focused on long-term durability and sustainability. This research highlights the need for careful optimization of mix proportions to find a middle ground between environmental benefits and mechanical performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信