IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Isabella Hevily Silva Torquato, Camila Silveira Souza, Daniele Regina Parizotto, Cibele Cardoso Castro
{"title":"Network of interactions between bees and vegetable crops in Northeastern Brazil","authors":"Isabella Hevily Silva Torquato,&nbsp;Camila Silveira Souza,&nbsp;Daniele Regina Parizotto,&nbsp;Cibele Cardoso Castro","doi":"10.1007/s11829-025-10140-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pollination maintains natural communities and agricultural production by allowing and/or improving fruit and seed sets. Understanding local plant-pollinator interactions is important for enhancing crop pollination. This study investigated relationships between co-flowering crops and pollinators using six crops (pumpkin, watermelon, melon, gherkin, tomato, and sweet pepper) in NE Brazil. Questions raised include: What is the network’s structural pattern? Which bee groups are shared among co-flowering crops? 3) What is the functional role of the different species within the network? Field data were collected through focal observations. The network structure was described by connectivity and modularity calculations, and the role of species. A total of 27 bee species, across 19 genera and three families, were recorded. Apidae (15 species), Halictidae (nine), and Andrenidae (three) were the families observed. The network was modular, with four modules related to floral attributes. No bee species was a network hub. <i>Paratrigona incerta</i> and <i>Ceratina</i> sp. were module hubs. <i>Paratrigona incerta</i> had the highest number of interactions, visiting all crops except pumpkin. <i>Apis mellifera</i>, although not a key pollinator, had the second-highest number of interactions, connecting to all Cucurbitaceae. We recommend promoting pollinator-friendly conservation practices, including <i>Paratrigona incerta</i> and <i>Ceratina</i> sp., and testing the management of efficient native bees for crops.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-025-10140-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

授粉可以促进和/或提高果实和种子的结实率,从而维持自然群落和农业生产。了解当地植物与传粉昆虫之间的相互作用对于提高作物授粉非常重要。本研究利用巴西东北部的六种作物(南瓜、西瓜、甜瓜、小黄瓜、番茄和甜椒)调查了共花作物与传粉昆虫之间的关系。提出的问题包括网络的结构模式是什么?哪些蜂群在共花作物中共享?3) 网络中不同物种的功能作用是什么?通过重点观察收集了实地数据。通过连通性和模块化计算以及物种的作用来描述网络结构。共记录了 19 属 3 科 27 种蜜蜂。所观察到的蜂科包括喙蜂科(15 种)、半知蜂科(9 种)和安氏蜂科(3 种)。该网络是模块化的,其中四个模块与花的属性有关。没有蜂种是网络中心。Paratrigona incerta和Ceratina sp.是模块中心。除南瓜外,Paratrigona incerta访问了所有作物,互动次数最多。Apis mellifera 虽然不是主要授粉昆虫,但其互动次数位居第二,与所有葫芦科作物都有联系。我们建议推广对授粉者友好的保护措施,包括 Paratrigona incerta 和 Ceratina sp.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network of interactions between bees and vegetable crops in Northeastern Brazil

Pollination maintains natural communities and agricultural production by allowing and/or improving fruit and seed sets. Understanding local plant-pollinator interactions is important for enhancing crop pollination. This study investigated relationships between co-flowering crops and pollinators using six crops (pumpkin, watermelon, melon, gherkin, tomato, and sweet pepper) in NE Brazil. Questions raised include: What is the network’s structural pattern? Which bee groups are shared among co-flowering crops? 3) What is the functional role of the different species within the network? Field data were collected through focal observations. The network structure was described by connectivity and modularity calculations, and the role of species. A total of 27 bee species, across 19 genera and three families, were recorded. Apidae (15 species), Halictidae (nine), and Andrenidae (three) were the families observed. The network was modular, with four modules related to floral attributes. No bee species was a network hub. Paratrigona incerta and Ceratina sp. were module hubs. Paratrigona incerta had the highest number of interactions, visiting all crops except pumpkin. Apis mellifera, although not a key pollinator, had the second-highest number of interactions, connecting to all Cucurbitaceae. We recommend promoting pollinator-friendly conservation practices, including Paratrigona incerta and Ceratina sp., and testing the management of efficient native bees for crops.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Arthropod-Plant Interactions 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism. Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信