Alexandria D Bourgeois, Owen T Skinner, James J Karnia, Amanda C Smith, Dae Young Kim, Aitor Gallastegui, Maureen A Griffin, Meaghan O'Neill, Brandan G Wustefeld-Janssens, Gabrielle S Fontes, Laura E Selmic, Marine Traverson, Carlos H de M Souza, Judith Bertran, Brian Thomsen, Arathi Vinayak, Megan A Mickelson
{"title":"对比度增强计算机断层扫描用于鉴定犬结肠直肠间质瘤的潜在恶性程度。","authors":"Alexandria D Bourgeois, Owen T Skinner, James J Karnia, Amanda C Smith, Dae Young Kim, Aitor Gallastegui, Maureen A Griffin, Meaghan O'Neill, Brandan G Wustefeld-Janssens, Gabrielle S Fontes, Laura E Selmic, Marine Traverson, Carlos H de M Souza, Judith Bertran, Brian Thomsen, Arathi Vinayak, Megan A Mickelson","doi":"10.1111/vco.13047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cross-sectional imaging may be used to characterise the location and extent of colorectal mesenchymal tumours (CRMTs). Given the anticipated variation in tumour behaviour and varying morbidity based on surgical margins, a reliable, non-invasive means of predicting malignant potential could facilitate case management. The purpose of this multi-institutional, retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for distinguishing benign and malignant CRMTs. Twenty-seven dogs with CRMTs were included. Initial diagnoses were reviewed, and slides or blocks were available for 24/27 dogs for further histologic review and immunohistochemical labelling for smooth muscle actin, KIT and vimentin. Two masked radiologists reviewed DICOM images for tumour characteristics, including a final, binary, consensus, subjective interpretation of malignancy. Eighteen tumours (66.7%) were classified as leiomyoma, one (3.7%) as a benign other non-lymphogenic intestinal mesenchymal tumour (benign), one (3.7%) as leiomyosarcoma, and seven (25.9%) as gastrointestinal stromal tumour (malignant). Agreement between radiologists ranged from none to weak for categorical variables, with no agreement (κ = 0.135) for the final assessment of a tumour as benign or malignant. Substantial overlap was noted between groups, with no single categorical variable demonstrating high accuracy as a predictor of malignancy. Consensus final assessment was a sensitive (80.0%) but not specific (29.4%) predictor of malignancy (accuracy: 48.2%). No association was identified between CT determination of malignancy and histologic determination of malignancy (p = 0.678). Non-standardised contrast-enhanced CT was ineffective at distinguishing malignant from benign CRMTs in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23693,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and comparative oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for Identification of Potential Malignancy in Canine Colorectal Mesenchymal Tumours.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandria D Bourgeois, Owen T Skinner, James J Karnia, Amanda C Smith, Dae Young Kim, Aitor Gallastegui, Maureen A Griffin, Meaghan O'Neill, Brandan G Wustefeld-Janssens, Gabrielle S Fontes, Laura E Selmic, Marine Traverson, Carlos H de M Souza, Judith Bertran, Brian Thomsen, Arathi Vinayak, Megan A Mickelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vco.13047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cross-sectional imaging may be used to characterise the location and extent of colorectal mesenchymal tumours (CRMTs). Given the anticipated variation in tumour behaviour and varying morbidity based on surgical margins, a reliable, non-invasive means of predicting malignant potential could facilitate case management. The purpose of this multi-institutional, retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for distinguishing benign and malignant CRMTs. Twenty-seven dogs with CRMTs were included. Initial diagnoses were reviewed, and slides or blocks were available for 24/27 dogs for further histologic review and immunohistochemical labelling for smooth muscle actin, KIT and vimentin. Two masked radiologists reviewed DICOM images for tumour characteristics, including a final, binary, consensus, subjective interpretation of malignancy. Eighteen tumours (66.7%) were classified as leiomyoma, one (3.7%) as a benign other non-lymphogenic intestinal mesenchymal tumour (benign), one (3.7%) as leiomyosarcoma, and seven (25.9%) as gastrointestinal stromal tumour (malignant). Agreement between radiologists ranged from none to weak for categorical variables, with no agreement (κ = 0.135) for the final assessment of a tumour as benign or malignant. Substantial overlap was noted between groups, with no single categorical variable demonstrating high accuracy as a predictor of malignancy. Consensus final assessment was a sensitive (80.0%) but not specific (29.4%) predictor of malignancy (accuracy: 48.2%). No association was identified between CT determination of malignancy and histologic determination of malignancy (p = 0.678). Non-standardised contrast-enhanced CT was ineffective at distinguishing malignant from benign CRMTs in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and comparative oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and comparative oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.13047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and comparative oncology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.13047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for Identification of Potential Malignancy in Canine Colorectal Mesenchymal Tumours.
Cross-sectional imaging may be used to characterise the location and extent of colorectal mesenchymal tumours (CRMTs). Given the anticipated variation in tumour behaviour and varying morbidity based on surgical margins, a reliable, non-invasive means of predicting malignant potential could facilitate case management. The purpose of this multi-institutional, retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for distinguishing benign and malignant CRMTs. Twenty-seven dogs with CRMTs were included. Initial diagnoses were reviewed, and slides or blocks were available for 24/27 dogs for further histologic review and immunohistochemical labelling for smooth muscle actin, KIT and vimentin. Two masked radiologists reviewed DICOM images for tumour characteristics, including a final, binary, consensus, subjective interpretation of malignancy. Eighteen tumours (66.7%) were classified as leiomyoma, one (3.7%) as a benign other non-lymphogenic intestinal mesenchymal tumour (benign), one (3.7%) as leiomyosarcoma, and seven (25.9%) as gastrointestinal stromal tumour (malignant). Agreement between radiologists ranged from none to weak for categorical variables, with no agreement (κ = 0.135) for the final assessment of a tumour as benign or malignant. Substantial overlap was noted between groups, with no single categorical variable demonstrating high accuracy as a predictor of malignancy. Consensus final assessment was a sensitive (80.0%) but not specific (29.4%) predictor of malignancy (accuracy: 48.2%). No association was identified between CT determination of malignancy and histologic determination of malignancy (p = 0.678). Non-standardised contrast-enhanced CT was ineffective at distinguishing malignant from benign CRMTs in this study.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary and Comparative Oncology (VCO) is an international, peer-reviewed journal integrating clinical and scientific information from a variety of related disciplines and from worldwide sources for all veterinary oncologists and cancer researchers concerned with aetiology, diagnosis and clinical course of cancer in domestic animals and its prevention. With the ultimate aim of diminishing suffering from cancer, the journal supports the transfer of knowledge in all aspects of veterinary oncology, from the application of new laboratory technology to cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis and therapy. In addition to original articles, the journal publishes solicited editorials, review articles, commentary, correspondence and abstracts from the published literature. Accordingly, studies describing laboratory work performed exclusively in purpose-bred domestic animals (e.g. dogs, cats, horses) will not be considered.