对比度增强计算机断层扫描用于鉴定犬结肠直肠间质瘤的潜在恶性程度。

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Alexandria D Bourgeois, Owen T Skinner, James J Karnia, Amanda C Smith, Dae Young Kim, Aitor Gallastegui, Maureen A Griffin, Meaghan O'Neill, Brandan G Wustefeld-Janssens, Gabrielle S Fontes, Laura E Selmic, Marine Traverson, Carlos H de M Souza, Judith Bertran, Brian Thomsen, Arathi Vinayak, Megan A Mickelson
{"title":"对比度增强计算机断层扫描用于鉴定犬结肠直肠间质瘤的潜在恶性程度。","authors":"Alexandria D Bourgeois, Owen T Skinner, James J Karnia, Amanda C Smith, Dae Young Kim, Aitor Gallastegui, Maureen A Griffin, Meaghan O'Neill, Brandan G Wustefeld-Janssens, Gabrielle S Fontes, Laura E Selmic, Marine Traverson, Carlos H de M Souza, Judith Bertran, Brian Thomsen, Arathi Vinayak, Megan A Mickelson","doi":"10.1111/vco.13047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cross-sectional imaging may be used to characterise the location and extent of colorectal mesenchymal tumours (CRMTs). Given the anticipated variation in tumour behaviour and varying morbidity based on surgical margins, a reliable, non-invasive means of predicting malignant potential could facilitate case management. The purpose of this multi-institutional, retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for distinguishing benign and malignant CRMTs. Twenty-seven dogs with CRMTs were included. Initial diagnoses were reviewed, and slides or blocks were available for 24/27 dogs for further histologic review and immunohistochemical labelling for smooth muscle actin, KIT and vimentin. Two masked radiologists reviewed DICOM images for tumour characteristics, including a final, binary, consensus, subjective interpretation of malignancy. Eighteen tumours (66.7%) were classified as leiomyoma, one (3.7%) as a benign other non-lymphogenic intestinal mesenchymal tumour (benign), one (3.7%) as leiomyosarcoma, and seven (25.9%) as gastrointestinal stromal tumour (malignant). Agreement between radiologists ranged from none to weak for categorical variables, with no agreement (κ = 0.135) for the final assessment of a tumour as benign or malignant. Substantial overlap was noted between groups, with no single categorical variable demonstrating high accuracy as a predictor of malignancy. Consensus final assessment was a sensitive (80.0%) but not specific (29.4%) predictor of malignancy (accuracy: 48.2%). No association was identified between CT determination of malignancy and histologic determination of malignancy (p = 0.678). Non-standardised contrast-enhanced CT was ineffective at distinguishing malignant from benign CRMTs in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23693,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and comparative oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for Identification of Potential Malignancy in Canine Colorectal Mesenchymal Tumours.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandria D Bourgeois, Owen T Skinner, James J Karnia, Amanda C Smith, Dae Young Kim, Aitor Gallastegui, Maureen A Griffin, Meaghan O'Neill, Brandan G Wustefeld-Janssens, Gabrielle S Fontes, Laura E Selmic, Marine Traverson, Carlos H de M Souza, Judith Bertran, Brian Thomsen, Arathi Vinayak, Megan A Mickelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vco.13047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cross-sectional imaging may be used to characterise the location and extent of colorectal mesenchymal tumours (CRMTs). Given the anticipated variation in tumour behaviour and varying morbidity based on surgical margins, a reliable, non-invasive means of predicting malignant potential could facilitate case management. The purpose of this multi-institutional, retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for distinguishing benign and malignant CRMTs. Twenty-seven dogs with CRMTs were included. Initial diagnoses were reviewed, and slides or blocks were available for 24/27 dogs for further histologic review and immunohistochemical labelling for smooth muscle actin, KIT and vimentin. Two masked radiologists reviewed DICOM images for tumour characteristics, including a final, binary, consensus, subjective interpretation of malignancy. Eighteen tumours (66.7%) were classified as leiomyoma, one (3.7%) as a benign other non-lymphogenic intestinal mesenchymal tumour (benign), one (3.7%) as leiomyosarcoma, and seven (25.9%) as gastrointestinal stromal tumour (malignant). Agreement between radiologists ranged from none to weak for categorical variables, with no agreement (κ = 0.135) for the final assessment of a tumour as benign or malignant. Substantial overlap was noted between groups, with no single categorical variable demonstrating high accuracy as a predictor of malignancy. Consensus final assessment was a sensitive (80.0%) but not specific (29.4%) predictor of malignancy (accuracy: 48.2%). No association was identified between CT determination of malignancy and histologic determination of malignancy (p = 0.678). Non-standardised contrast-enhanced CT was ineffective at distinguishing malignant from benign CRMTs in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and comparative oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and comparative oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.13047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and comparative oncology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.13047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for Identification of Potential Malignancy in Canine Colorectal Mesenchymal Tumours.

Cross-sectional imaging may be used to characterise the location and extent of colorectal mesenchymal tumours (CRMTs). Given the anticipated variation in tumour behaviour and varying morbidity based on surgical margins, a reliable, non-invasive means of predicting malignant potential could facilitate case management. The purpose of this multi-institutional, retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for distinguishing benign and malignant CRMTs. Twenty-seven dogs with CRMTs were included. Initial diagnoses were reviewed, and slides or blocks were available for 24/27 dogs for further histologic review and immunohistochemical labelling for smooth muscle actin, KIT and vimentin. Two masked radiologists reviewed DICOM images for tumour characteristics, including a final, binary, consensus, subjective interpretation of malignancy. Eighteen tumours (66.7%) were classified as leiomyoma, one (3.7%) as a benign other non-lymphogenic intestinal mesenchymal tumour (benign), one (3.7%) as leiomyosarcoma, and seven (25.9%) as gastrointestinal stromal tumour (malignant). Agreement between radiologists ranged from none to weak for categorical variables, with no agreement (κ = 0.135) for the final assessment of a tumour as benign or malignant. Substantial overlap was noted between groups, with no single categorical variable demonstrating high accuracy as a predictor of malignancy. Consensus final assessment was a sensitive (80.0%) but not specific (29.4%) predictor of malignancy (accuracy: 48.2%). No association was identified between CT determination of malignancy and histologic determination of malignancy (p = 0.678). Non-standardised contrast-enhanced CT was ineffective at distinguishing malignant from benign CRMTs in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary and comparative oncology
Veterinary and comparative oncology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
75
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary and Comparative Oncology (VCO) is an international, peer-reviewed journal integrating clinical and scientific information from a variety of related disciplines and from worldwide sources for all veterinary oncologists and cancer researchers concerned with aetiology, diagnosis and clinical course of cancer in domestic animals and its prevention. With the ultimate aim of diminishing suffering from cancer, the journal supports the transfer of knowledge in all aspects of veterinary oncology, from the application of new laboratory technology to cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis and therapy. In addition to original articles, the journal publishes solicited editorials, review articles, commentary, correspondence and abstracts from the published literature. Accordingly, studies describing laboratory work performed exclusively in purpose-bred domestic animals (e.g. dogs, cats, horses) will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信