验证Pocheina属(Acrasidae, Heterolobosea, disba)导致Acrasidae中三个主要谱系的确认

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Alexander K. Tice, Kevin Regis, Timothy E. Shutt, Frederick W. Spiegel, Matthew W. Brown, Jeffrey D. Silberman
{"title":"验证Pocheina属(Acrasidae, Heterolobosea, disba)导致Acrasidae中三个主要谱系的确认","authors":"Alexander K. Tice,&nbsp;Kevin Regis,&nbsp;Timothy E. Shutt,&nbsp;Frederick W. Spiegel,&nbsp;Matthew W. Brown,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Silberman","doi":"10.1111/jeu.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><i>Pocheina</i> and <i>Acrasis</i> are two genera of heterolobosean sorocarpic amoebae within Acrasidae that have historically been considered close relatives. The two genera were differentiated based on their differing fruiting body morphologies. The validity of this taxonomic distinction was challenged when a SSU rRNA phylogenetic study placed an isolate morphologically identified as “<i>Pocheina</i>” <i>rosea</i> within a clade of <i>Acrasis rosea</i> isolates. The authors speculated that pocheinoid fruiting body morphology might be the result of aberrant <i>Ac</i>. <i>rosea</i> fruiting body development, which, if true, would nullify this taxonomic distinction between genera. To clarify Acrasidae systematics, we analyzed SSU rRNA and ITS region sequences from multiple isolates of <i>Pocheina</i>, <i>Acrasis</i>, and <i>Allovahlkampfia</i> generated by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and transcriptomics. We demonstrate that the initial SSU sequence attributed to “<i>P</i>. <i>rosea</i>” originated from an <i>Ac</i>. <i>rosea</i> DNA contamination in its amplification reaction. Our analyses, based on morphology, SSU and 5.8S rRNA gene phylogenies, as well as comparative analyses of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences, resolve Acrasidae into three major lineages: <i>Allovahlkampfia</i> and the strongly supported clades comprising <i>Pocheina</i> and <i>Acrasis</i>. We confirm that the latter two genera can be identified by their fruiting body morphologies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology","volume":"72 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the Genus Pocheina (Acrasidae, Heterolobosea, Discoba) Leads to the Recognition of Three Major Lineages Within Acrasidae\",\"authors\":\"Alexander K. Tice,&nbsp;Kevin Regis,&nbsp;Timothy E. Shutt,&nbsp;Frederick W. Spiegel,&nbsp;Matthew W. Brown,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Silberman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jeu.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p><i>Pocheina</i> and <i>Acrasis</i> are two genera of heterolobosean sorocarpic amoebae within Acrasidae that have historically been considered close relatives. The two genera were differentiated based on their differing fruiting body morphologies. The validity of this taxonomic distinction was challenged when a SSU rRNA phylogenetic study placed an isolate morphologically identified as “<i>Pocheina</i>” <i>rosea</i> within a clade of <i>Acrasis rosea</i> isolates. The authors speculated that pocheinoid fruiting body morphology might be the result of aberrant <i>Ac</i>. <i>rosea</i> fruiting body development, which, if true, would nullify this taxonomic distinction between genera. To clarify Acrasidae systematics, we analyzed SSU rRNA and ITS region sequences from multiple isolates of <i>Pocheina</i>, <i>Acrasis</i>, and <i>Allovahlkampfia</i> generated by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and transcriptomics. We demonstrate that the initial SSU sequence attributed to “<i>P</i>. <i>rosea</i>” originated from an <i>Ac</i>. <i>rosea</i> DNA contamination in its amplification reaction. Our analyses, based on morphology, SSU and 5.8S rRNA gene phylogenies, as well as comparative analyses of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences, resolve Acrasidae into three major lineages: <i>Allovahlkampfia</i> and the strongly supported clades comprising <i>Pocheina</i> and <i>Acrasis</i>. We confirm that the latter two genera can be identified by their fruiting body morphologies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"72 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jeu.70004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jeu.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Pocheina和Acrasis是acrasiae科中异色异食变形虫的两个属,历史上被认为是近亲。根据不同的子实体形态对两属进行了区分。当一项SSU rRNA系统发育研究将一株形态上被鉴定为“Pocheina”玫瑰的分离物置于玫瑰枝分离物的分支中时,这种分类区分的有效性受到了挑战。作者推测,pocheinoid子实体的形态可能是异常的玫瑰Ac. rosesea子实体发育的结果,如果这是真的,将使这种属之间的分类区分无效。为了明确棘球蚴科的系统,我们分析了聚合酶链反应(PCR)和转录组学方法从Pocheina, Acrasis和Allovahlkampfia多个分离株中获得的SSU rRNA和ITS区域序列。我们证明了最初的SSU序列归属于“P。“玫瑰”起源于ac玫瑰DNA在其扩增反应中的污染。基于形态学、SSU和5.8S rRNA基因的系统发育,以及ITS1和ITS2序列的比较分析,我们将Acrasidae划分为三个主要分支:Allovahlkampfia和Pocheina和Acrasis。我们证实后两属可以通过它们的子实体形态来识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating the Genus Pocheina (Acrasidae, Heterolobosea, Discoba) Leads to the Recognition of Three Major Lineages Within Acrasidae

Pocheina and Acrasis are two genera of heterolobosean sorocarpic amoebae within Acrasidae that have historically been considered close relatives. The two genera were differentiated based on their differing fruiting body morphologies. The validity of this taxonomic distinction was challenged when a SSU rRNA phylogenetic study placed an isolate morphologically identified as “Pocheinarosea within a clade of Acrasis rosea isolates. The authors speculated that pocheinoid fruiting body morphology might be the result of aberrant Ac. rosea fruiting body development, which, if true, would nullify this taxonomic distinction between genera. To clarify Acrasidae systematics, we analyzed SSU rRNA and ITS region sequences from multiple isolates of Pocheina, Acrasis, and Allovahlkampfia generated by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and transcriptomics. We demonstrate that the initial SSU sequence attributed to “P. rosea” originated from an Ac. rosea DNA contamination in its amplification reaction. Our analyses, based on morphology, SSU and 5.8S rRNA gene phylogenies, as well as comparative analyses of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences, resolve Acrasidae into three major lineages: Allovahlkampfia and the strongly supported clades comprising Pocheina and Acrasis. We confirm that the latter two genera can be identified by their fruiting body morphologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology publishes original research on protists, including lower algae and fungi. Articles are published covering all aspects of these organisms, including their behavior, biochemistry, cell biology, chemotherapy, development, ecology, evolution, genetics, molecular biology, morphogenetics, parasitology, systematics, and ultrastructure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信