greenhush的综合分析

Joshua Hilton
{"title":"greenhush的综合分析","authors":"Joshua Hilton","doi":"10.1016/j.igd.2025.100222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Greenhushing, the strategic under-reporting of sustainability initiatives by corporations, is a recent phenomenon that challenges traditional assumptions about corporate sustainability communication. Through a systematic analysis of existing literature and the application of institutional theory, this paper develops an integrated theoretical framework to explain the causes of greenhush. Drawing on a combination of qualitative case studies and empirical evidence from multiple industries, the research reveals that greenhush emerges as a strategic response to institutional complexity, particularly when firms face competing stakeholder demands and regulatory uncertainty. The paper makes three key contributions: First, it surveys the recent literature and explore the implications of greenhush for corporate sustainability progress, stakeholder relations, and policy development. Second, it develops a multi-level theoretical framework integrating insights from institutional theory, stakeholder theory, and behavioral economics to explain why and how firms greenhush. Third, it provides suggestions for managers and stakeholders about how to avoid or reverse this decoupling, and align communication with action. These findings have important implications for understanding how organizations navigate institutional pressures while maintaining legitimacy in complex institutional environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100674,"journal":{"name":"Innovation and Green Development","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated analysis of greenhush\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Hilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.igd.2025.100222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Greenhushing, the strategic under-reporting of sustainability initiatives by corporations, is a recent phenomenon that challenges traditional assumptions about corporate sustainability communication. Through a systematic analysis of existing literature and the application of institutional theory, this paper develops an integrated theoretical framework to explain the causes of greenhush. Drawing on a combination of qualitative case studies and empirical evidence from multiple industries, the research reveals that greenhush emerges as a strategic response to institutional complexity, particularly when firms face competing stakeholder demands and regulatory uncertainty. The paper makes three key contributions: First, it surveys the recent literature and explore the implications of greenhush for corporate sustainability progress, stakeholder relations, and policy development. Second, it develops a multi-level theoretical framework integrating insights from institutional theory, stakeholder theory, and behavioral economics to explain why and how firms greenhush. Third, it provides suggestions for managers and stakeholders about how to avoid or reverse this decoupling, and align communication with action. These findings have important implications for understanding how organizations navigate institutional pressures while maintaining legitimacy in complex institutional environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation and Green Development\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation and Green Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753125000190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation and Green Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753125000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Greenhushing,即企业战略性地少报可持续性倡议,是最近出现的一种现象,它挑战了有关企业可持续性沟通的传统假设。本文通过对已有文献的系统分析和制度理论的运用,构建了一个完整的理论框架来解释绿色缄默的成因。该研究结合了定性案例研究和来自多个行业的经验证据,揭示了绿色静默作为对制度复杂性的战略回应而出现,特别是当企业面临竞争的利益相关者需求和监管不确定性时。本文的主要贡献有三:首先,研究了最近的文献,并探讨了绿色静默对企业可持续发展进展、利益相关者关系和政策制定的影响。其次,建立了一个多层次的理论框架,整合了制度理论、利益相关者理论和行为经济学的见解,来解释企业为什么和如何“绿帽子”。第三,它为管理者和利益相关者提供了如何避免或扭转这种脱钩的建议,并使沟通与行动保持一致。这些发现对于理解组织如何在复杂的制度环境中应对制度压力同时保持合法性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An integrated analysis of greenhush
Greenhushing, the strategic under-reporting of sustainability initiatives by corporations, is a recent phenomenon that challenges traditional assumptions about corporate sustainability communication. Through a systematic analysis of existing literature and the application of institutional theory, this paper develops an integrated theoretical framework to explain the causes of greenhush. Drawing on a combination of qualitative case studies and empirical evidence from multiple industries, the research reveals that greenhush emerges as a strategic response to institutional complexity, particularly when firms face competing stakeholder demands and regulatory uncertainty. The paper makes three key contributions: First, it surveys the recent literature and explore the implications of greenhush for corporate sustainability progress, stakeholder relations, and policy development. Second, it develops a multi-level theoretical framework integrating insights from institutional theory, stakeholder theory, and behavioral economics to explain why and how firms greenhush. Third, it provides suggestions for managers and stakeholders about how to avoid or reverse this decoupling, and align communication with action. These findings have important implications for understanding how organizations navigate institutional pressures while maintaining legitimacy in complex institutional environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信