产科医生如何经历死产和围产期损失:系统回顾和综合

Frances Cates , Sara Wetzler , Tabitha Wishlade , Mehali Patel , Catherine E. Aiken MB/BChir, PhD
{"title":"产科医生如何经历死产和围产期损失:系统回顾和综合","authors":"Frances Cates ,&nbsp;Sara Wetzler ,&nbsp;Tabitha Wishlade ,&nbsp;Mehali Patel ,&nbsp;Catherine E. Aiken MB/BChir, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Globally, ∼2 million babies are stillborn annually, many in low- and middle-income countries. We aim to understand the experience of obstetricians caring for parents who experience stillbirth and perinatal loss across global settings.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div><em>:</em> Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via Ebsco, PsychINFO via Ebsco, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and ASSIA via Proquest were searched, database inception-June 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study Eligibility Criteria</h3><div>Studies with qualitative components describing experiences of obstetricians providing stillbirth care in any global setting.</div></div><div><h3>Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods</h3><div>The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research was utilized to conduct quality assessment. NVivo software was employed for inductive coding and thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen qualitative studies from both low- and high-resource settings met the inclusion criteria for meta-synthesis. We identified several major themes including the emotional burdens experienced by obstetricians providing stillbirth care, the challenges of patient-provider interactions following adverse outcomes, and a lack of support and resources. Obstetricians across global settings felt devastation, guilt, blame, and a sense of personal responsibility following stillbirth. Obstetricians struggled to navigate the burden of expectation placed on their overall provision of care and tended to question their own professional competence. A subset of obstetricians felt unprepared for the complexity of patient-provider interactions following stillbirth.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Obstetricians experienced complex and conflicting emotions, citing high emotional burden from managing stillbirth cases. Obstetricians identified lack of training and support for providing bereavement care across healthcare settings, indicating a gap that should be filled by stillbirth and bereavement care interventions and education in obstetrical training programs across global settings. Infrastructure for bereavement care training and support systems for obstetricians are crucial to improve the quality of stillbirth and perinatal loss care and prevent an exodus of needed providers for women's care worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How obstetricians experience stillbirth and perinatal loss: a systematic review and meta-synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Frances Cates ,&nbsp;Sara Wetzler ,&nbsp;Tabitha Wishlade ,&nbsp;Mehali Patel ,&nbsp;Catherine E. Aiken MB/BChir, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Globally, ∼2 million babies are stillborn annually, many in low- and middle-income countries. We aim to understand the experience of obstetricians caring for parents who experience stillbirth and perinatal loss across global settings.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div><em>:</em> Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via Ebsco, PsychINFO via Ebsco, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and ASSIA via Proquest were searched, database inception-June 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study Eligibility Criteria</h3><div>Studies with qualitative components describing experiences of obstetricians providing stillbirth care in any global setting.</div></div><div><h3>Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods</h3><div>The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research was utilized to conduct quality assessment. NVivo software was employed for inductive coding and thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen qualitative studies from both low- and high-resource settings met the inclusion criteria for meta-synthesis. We identified several major themes including the emotional burdens experienced by obstetricians providing stillbirth care, the challenges of patient-provider interactions following adverse outcomes, and a lack of support and resources. Obstetricians across global settings felt devastation, guilt, blame, and a sense of personal responsibility following stillbirth. Obstetricians struggled to navigate the burden of expectation placed on their overall provision of care and tended to question their own professional competence. A subset of obstetricians felt unprepared for the complexity of patient-provider interactions following stillbirth.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Obstetricians experienced complex and conflicting emotions, citing high emotional burden from managing stillbirth cases. Obstetricians identified lack of training and support for providing bereavement care across healthcare settings, indicating a gap that should be filled by stillbirth and bereavement care interventions and education in obstetrical training programs across global settings. Infrastructure for bereavement care training and support systems for obstetricians are crucial to improve the quality of stillbirth and perinatal loss care and prevent an exodus of needed providers for women's care worldwide.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825000267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球每年约有200万婴儿死产,其中许多在低收入和中等收入国家。我们的目的是了解产科医生照顾父母谁经历死产和围产期损失在全球设置的经验。检索数据来源:Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via Ebsco, PsychINFO via Ebsco, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ASSIA via Proquest,数据库建立至2024年6月。研究资格标准具有定性成分的研究描述产科医生在任何全球环境中提供死胎护理的经验。研究评估和综合方法定性研究的关键评估技能程序检查表被用来进行质量评估。采用NVivo软件进行归纳编码和专题分析。结果来自低资源和高资源环境的13项定性研究符合meta综合的纳入标准。我们确定了几个主要主题,包括产科医生提供死产护理所经历的情感负担,不良结果后患者与提供者互动的挑战,以及缺乏支持和资源。世界各地的产科医生在死产后感到崩溃、内疚、责备和个人责任感。产科医生努力应对人们对他们整体护理服务的期望,并倾向于质疑自己的专业能力。一部分产科医生对死产后患者与医生之间复杂的互动感到措手不及。结论产科医生在处理死产病例中情绪负担高,情绪复杂且矛盾。产科医生发现,在提供丧亲护理方面缺乏培训和支持,这表明应该通过死产和丧亲护理干预措施以及全球产科培训计划中的教育来填补这一空白。丧亲护理培训和产科医生支持系统的基础设施对于提高死产和围产期损失护理的质量以及防止世界各地所需的妇女护理提供者外流至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How obstetricians experience stillbirth and perinatal loss: a systematic review and meta-synthesis

Objective

Globally, ∼2 million babies are stillborn annually, many in low- and middle-income countries. We aim to understand the experience of obstetricians caring for parents who experience stillbirth and perinatal loss across global settings.

Data Sources

: Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via Ebsco, PsychINFO via Ebsco, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and ASSIA via Proquest were searched, database inception-June 2024.

Study Eligibility Criteria

Studies with qualitative components describing experiences of obstetricians providing stillbirth care in any global setting.

Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods

The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research was utilized to conduct quality assessment. NVivo software was employed for inductive coding and thematic analysis.

Results

Thirteen qualitative studies from both low- and high-resource settings met the inclusion criteria for meta-synthesis. We identified several major themes including the emotional burdens experienced by obstetricians providing stillbirth care, the challenges of patient-provider interactions following adverse outcomes, and a lack of support and resources. Obstetricians across global settings felt devastation, guilt, blame, and a sense of personal responsibility following stillbirth. Obstetricians struggled to navigate the burden of expectation placed on their overall provision of care and tended to question their own professional competence. A subset of obstetricians felt unprepared for the complexity of patient-provider interactions following stillbirth.

Conclusions

Obstetricians experienced complex and conflicting emotions, citing high emotional burden from managing stillbirth cases. Obstetricians identified lack of training and support for providing bereavement care across healthcare settings, indicating a gap that should be filled by stillbirth and bereavement care interventions and education in obstetrical training programs across global settings. Infrastructure for bereavement care training and support systems for obstetricians are crucial to improve the quality of stillbirth and perinatal loss care and prevent an exodus of needed providers for women's care worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信