时间动作效应预测不影响响度知觉,但影响代理感

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Elisabeth Lindner , Tobias Schöberl , Andrea Desantis , Alexander Gail
{"title":"时间动作效应预测不影响响度知觉,但影响代理感","authors":"Elisabeth Lindner ,&nbsp;Tobias Schöberl ,&nbsp;Andrea Desantis ,&nbsp;Alexander Gail","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motor theories propose that predicting sensory consequences of one’s own actions reduces perception and neural processing of these action-effects, a phenomenon known as sensory attenuation, considered an implicit measure of agency. However, recent findings question the link between action-effect prediction and sensory attenuation. This study directly examined the link between temporal action-effect prediction and auditory sensory attenuation, alongside assessing self-reported agency. Participants experienced self-initiated auditory effects with varying latencies and compared their loudness to a reference tone, whose intensities were modulated to measure auditory discrimination. Results showed no change in perceived loudness across delays, while agency ratings decreased with longer delays. A second experiment controlled for hazard rate effects, confirming initial findings. Our results contrast previous behavioral findings from the tactile modality and conclusions drawn from auditory electroencephalography. We suggest reconsidering auditory sensory attenuation as a necessary consequence of action-effect prediction and as an implicit measure of agency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 103837"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal action-effect prediction does not affect perceived loudness, but the sense of agency\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Lindner ,&nbsp;Tobias Schöberl ,&nbsp;Andrea Desantis ,&nbsp;Alexander Gail\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Motor theories propose that predicting sensory consequences of one’s own actions reduces perception and neural processing of these action-effects, a phenomenon known as sensory attenuation, considered an implicit measure of agency. However, recent findings question the link between action-effect prediction and sensory attenuation. This study directly examined the link between temporal action-effect prediction and auditory sensory attenuation, alongside assessing self-reported agency. Participants experienced self-initiated auditory effects with varying latencies and compared their loudness to a reference tone, whose intensities were modulated to measure auditory discrimination. Results showed no change in perceived loudness across delays, while agency ratings decreased with longer delays. A second experiment controlled for hazard rate effects, confirming initial findings. Our results contrast previous behavioral findings from the tactile modality and conclusions drawn from auditory electroencephalography. We suggest reconsidering auditory sensory attenuation as a necessary consequence of action-effect prediction and as an implicit measure of agency.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consciousness and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consciousness and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810025000303\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810025000303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动理论提出,预测自己行为的感觉后果会减少对这些行为效应的感知和神经处理,这种现象被称为感觉衰减,被认为是代理的隐含衡量标准。然而,最近的研究结果质疑动作效应预测和感觉衰减之间的联系。本研究直接考察了时间动作效应预测与听觉衰减之间的联系,同时评估了自我报告的代理。参与者经历了不同潜伏期的自发听觉效应,并将其音量与参考音进行比较,参考音的强度被调节以测量听觉辨别。结果显示,在延误期间,感知到的响度没有变化,而机构评级随着延误时间的延长而下降。第二个实验控制了危险率的影响,证实了最初的发现。我们的研究结果对比了先前触觉模态的行为发现和听觉脑电图的结论。我们建议重新考虑听觉衰减作为动作-效果预测的必要结果和作为代理的隐含测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal action-effect prediction does not affect perceived loudness, but the sense of agency
Motor theories propose that predicting sensory consequences of one’s own actions reduces perception and neural processing of these action-effects, a phenomenon known as sensory attenuation, considered an implicit measure of agency. However, recent findings question the link between action-effect prediction and sensory attenuation. This study directly examined the link between temporal action-effect prediction and auditory sensory attenuation, alongside assessing self-reported agency. Participants experienced self-initiated auditory effects with varying latencies and compared their loudness to a reference tone, whose intensities were modulated to measure auditory discrimination. Results showed no change in perceived loudness across delays, while agency ratings decreased with longer delays. A second experiment controlled for hazard rate effects, confirming initial findings. Our results contrast previous behavioral findings from the tactile modality and conclusions drawn from auditory electroencephalography. We suggest reconsidering auditory sensory attenuation as a necessary consequence of action-effect prediction and as an implicit measure of agency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信