聚光太阳能发电技术生命周期评价研究:文献综述

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
M.A. Palmero-González , E. Batuecas, C. Marugán-Cruz, D. Santana
{"title":"聚光太阳能发电技术生命周期评价研究:文献综述","authors":"M.A. Palmero-González ,&nbsp;E. Batuecas,&nbsp;C. Marugán-Cruz,&nbsp;D. Santana","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2025.104257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study offers a literature review of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in the context of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) technology. The methodology involved a bibliometric search and an in-depth critical literature review. The existing reviews indicated opportunities to enhance clarity in the methodology used for selecting literature. Subsequently, the reviewed literature was presented in tabular format, categorized according to CSP plant configuration, subsystem, and technology purpose. The findings indicate lack of available data to perform accurate inventories, and a lack of harmonization of the Life Cycle Impact Assessment methodologies. The results revealed that the most analyzed impact category was climate change, with values averaging 50 g CO<sub>2</sub>, eq/kWh. There is a need for more LCA investigations about dish-Stirling and Linear Fresnel plants, as well as investigations analyzing other impact categories. Many studies in the CSP LCA domain are directing their attention towards thermal storage, however, the environmental impact of the decommissioning of plants has not yet been thoroughly analyzed. It has been observed that SimaPro is the preferred LCA software by the authors, together with Ecoinvent as database. The literature review revealed a gap in knowledge in LCA studies addressing operational challenges such as corrosion or fatigue, emerging solutions, and updated inventory data, presenting an opportunity for researchers to enhance the market viability of CSP technologies by addressing these deficiencies. Finally, a simplified case study comparing Central Receiver and Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) systems found that PTC had higher environmental impacts due to the contribution of the Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 104257"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment studies of concentrated solar power technology: A literature review\",\"authors\":\"M.A. Palmero-González ,&nbsp;E. Batuecas,&nbsp;C. Marugán-Cruz,&nbsp;D. Santana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seta.2025.104257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The current study offers a literature review of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in the context of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) technology. The methodology involved a bibliometric search and an in-depth critical literature review. The existing reviews indicated opportunities to enhance clarity in the methodology used for selecting literature. Subsequently, the reviewed literature was presented in tabular format, categorized according to CSP plant configuration, subsystem, and technology purpose. The findings indicate lack of available data to perform accurate inventories, and a lack of harmonization of the Life Cycle Impact Assessment methodologies. The results revealed that the most analyzed impact category was climate change, with values averaging 50 g CO<sub>2</sub>, eq/kWh. There is a need for more LCA investigations about dish-Stirling and Linear Fresnel plants, as well as investigations analyzing other impact categories. Many studies in the CSP LCA domain are directing their attention towards thermal storage, however, the environmental impact of the decommissioning of plants has not yet been thoroughly analyzed. It has been observed that SimaPro is the preferred LCA software by the authors, together with Ecoinvent as database. The literature review revealed a gap in knowledge in LCA studies addressing operational challenges such as corrosion or fatigue, emerging solutions, and updated inventory data, presenting an opportunity for researchers to enhance the market viability of CSP technologies by addressing these deficiencies. Finally, a simplified case study comparing Central Receiver and Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) systems found that PTC had higher environmental impacts due to the contribution of the Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138825000888\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138825000888","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对聚光太阳能(CSP)技术的生命周期评估(LCA)进行了文献综述。研究方法包括文献计量学检索和深入的批判性文献综述。现有的综述表明,有机会提高选择文献所用方法的清晰度。随后,回顾文献以表格形式呈现,根据CSP工厂配置,子系统和技术目的进行分类。调查结果表明,缺乏进行准确盘存的现有数据,也缺乏生命周期影响评估方法的统一。结果显示,分析最多的影响类别是气候变化,其值平均为50 g CO2, eq/kWh。有必要对碟形斯特林和线性菲涅耳植物进行更多的LCA调查,以及分析其他影响类别的调查。CSP LCA领域的许多研究都将注意力集中在储热上,然而,电厂退役对环境的影响尚未得到彻底的分析。作者认为SimaPro是首选的LCA软件,Ecoinvent是首选的数据库。文献综述揭示了LCA研究在解决诸如腐蚀或疲劳、新兴解决方案和更新库存数据等操作挑战方面的知识差距,这为研究人员提供了一个机会,通过解决这些缺陷来提高CSP技术的市场可行性。最后,通过比较中央集热器和抛物线槽集热器(PTC)系统的简化案例研究发现,由于传热流体(HTF)的贡献,PTC系统对环境的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Life cycle assessment studies of concentrated solar power technology: A literature review

Life cycle assessment studies of concentrated solar power technology: A literature review
The current study offers a literature review of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in the context of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) technology. The methodology involved a bibliometric search and an in-depth critical literature review. The existing reviews indicated opportunities to enhance clarity in the methodology used for selecting literature. Subsequently, the reviewed literature was presented in tabular format, categorized according to CSP plant configuration, subsystem, and technology purpose. The findings indicate lack of available data to perform accurate inventories, and a lack of harmonization of the Life Cycle Impact Assessment methodologies. The results revealed that the most analyzed impact category was climate change, with values averaging 50 g CO2, eq/kWh. There is a need for more LCA investigations about dish-Stirling and Linear Fresnel plants, as well as investigations analyzing other impact categories. Many studies in the CSP LCA domain are directing their attention towards thermal storage, however, the environmental impact of the decommissioning of plants has not yet been thoroughly analyzed. It has been observed that SimaPro is the preferred LCA software by the authors, together with Ecoinvent as database. The literature review revealed a gap in knowledge in LCA studies addressing operational challenges such as corrosion or fatigue, emerging solutions, and updated inventory data, presenting an opportunity for researchers to enhance the market viability of CSP technologies by addressing these deficiencies. Finally, a simplified case study comparing Central Receiver and Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) systems found that PTC had higher environmental impacts due to the contribution of the Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信