Keetie Kremers-van de Hei , Bob Evers , Lotte Weijers , Diederick Duijvesz , Berend Willem Schreurs , Sander Koeter
{"title":"一种微创导尿管治疗髋关节和膝关节置换术患者尿潴留的方案:一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Keetie Kremers-van de Hei , Bob Evers , Lotte Weijers , Diederick Duijvesz , Berend Willem Schreurs , Sander Koeter","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2025.101172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperative urinary retention is a frequently seen serious complication after surgery. After orthopaedic hip or knee arthroplasty the incidence is relatively high, between 30 and 50% in previous studies. Currently, there is no consensus on the indication for urinary catheterization and a uniform guideline is lacking. This prospective cohort study examined the safety of a modified catheterization protocol with a catheterization threshold of 800 ml instead of 400 ml (usual care) after elective joint arthroplasty using ultrasound bladder scans. The hypothesis was that the incidence of catheterization will be reduced without increasing urinary complications.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We prospectively included 305 patients who were treated according to the local fast track arthroplasty protocol in which a modified catheterization protocol was used. Catheterization was only performed at a scan volume of 800 ml or more. Bladder contents were monitored preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and at outpatient follow-up. Urological scores and complications were monitored. The usual care control group was treated according to the usual care protocol with a threshold for catheterization of 400 ml, these results were published in a previous study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incidence of catheterization for urinary retention was significantly lower in patients who were treated with the less invasive protocol than the usual care control group (11.1% versus 48.8%, p < 0.001). The rate of urologic complications was low using the new protocol (4% urinary tract infection and 0.3% pharmacological interventions).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of our study provide strong empirical support for modifying catheterization protocols after orthopaedic surgery. A less invasive protocol is safe, provides reduction in workload for nurses, is patient-friendly and reduces costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A less invasive catheterization protocol for managing urinary retention in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Keetie Kremers-van de Hei , Bob Evers , Lotte Weijers , Diederick Duijvesz , Berend Willem Schreurs , Sander Koeter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijotn.2025.101172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperative urinary retention is a frequently seen serious complication after surgery. After orthopaedic hip or knee arthroplasty the incidence is relatively high, between 30 and 50% in previous studies. Currently, there is no consensus on the indication for urinary catheterization and a uniform guideline is lacking. This prospective cohort study examined the safety of a modified catheterization protocol with a catheterization threshold of 800 ml instead of 400 ml (usual care) after elective joint arthroplasty using ultrasound bladder scans. The hypothesis was that the incidence of catheterization will be reduced without increasing urinary complications.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We prospectively included 305 patients who were treated according to the local fast track arthroplasty protocol in which a modified catheterization protocol was used. Catheterization was only performed at a scan volume of 800 ml or more. Bladder contents were monitored preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and at outpatient follow-up. Urological scores and complications were monitored. The usual care control group was treated according to the usual care protocol with a threshold for catheterization of 400 ml, these results were published in a previous study.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incidence of catheterization for urinary retention was significantly lower in patients who were treated with the less invasive protocol than the usual care control group (11.1% versus 48.8%, p < 0.001). The rate of urologic complications was low using the new protocol (4% urinary tract infection and 0.3% pharmacological interventions).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of our study provide strong empirical support for modifying catheterization protocols after orthopaedic surgery. A less invasive protocol is safe, provides reduction in workload for nurses, is patient-friendly and reduces costs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124125000164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124125000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景术后尿潴留是术后常见的严重并发症。在骨科髋关节或膝关节置换术后,发病率相对较高,在先前的研究中为30 - 50%。目前,关于导尿的指征没有共识,缺乏统一的指南。这项前瞻性队列研究检查了选择性关节置换术后使用超声膀胱扫描将置管阈值改为800ml而不是400ml(常规护理)的改进置管方案的安全性。假设导尿的发生率会降低,而不会增加泌尿系统并发症。方法前瞻性纳入305例采用局部快速通道关节置换术的患者,其中采用改良的置管方案。仅在扫描容积为800毫升或更多时进行导管插入。术前、术后及门诊随访监测膀胱内容物。监测泌尿系统评分和并发症。常规护理对照组按常规护理方案治疗,置管阈值为400ml,这些结果已在既往研究中发表。结果微创治疗组尿潴留导尿发生率明显低于常规治疗组(11.1% vs 48.8%, p <;0.001)。使用新方案的泌尿系统并发症发生率较低(4%尿路感染和0.3%药物干预)。结论本研究结果为骨科术后置管方案的修改提供了有力的实证支持。侵入性较小的方案是安全的,减少了护士的工作量,对患者友好,并降低了成本。
A less invasive catheterization protocol for managing urinary retention in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study
Background
Postoperative urinary retention is a frequently seen serious complication after surgery. After orthopaedic hip or knee arthroplasty the incidence is relatively high, between 30 and 50% in previous studies. Currently, there is no consensus on the indication for urinary catheterization and a uniform guideline is lacking. This prospective cohort study examined the safety of a modified catheterization protocol with a catheterization threshold of 800 ml instead of 400 ml (usual care) after elective joint arthroplasty using ultrasound bladder scans. The hypothesis was that the incidence of catheterization will be reduced without increasing urinary complications.
Method
We prospectively included 305 patients who were treated according to the local fast track arthroplasty protocol in which a modified catheterization protocol was used. Catheterization was only performed at a scan volume of 800 ml or more. Bladder contents were monitored preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and at outpatient follow-up. Urological scores and complications were monitored. The usual care control group was treated according to the usual care protocol with a threshold for catheterization of 400 ml, these results were published in a previous study.
Results
The incidence of catheterization for urinary retention was significantly lower in patients who were treated with the less invasive protocol than the usual care control group (11.1% versus 48.8%, p < 0.001). The rate of urologic complications was low using the new protocol (4% urinary tract infection and 0.3% pharmacological interventions).
Conclusion
The results of our study provide strong empirical support for modifying catheterization protocols after orthopaedic surgery. A less invasive protocol is safe, provides reduction in workload for nurses, is patient-friendly and reduces costs.