应用吸附和臭氧氧化法对污水处理厂出水进行四级处理以去除新出现的污染物:实验室规模实验的结果

IF 5.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Agostina Chiavola , Camilla Di Marcantonio , Andrea Noè Porretti , Sara Scagnetti , Veronica Ciuchi , Maria Rosaria Boni , Sacha Micoli , Marco Lazzazzara , Simone Leoni , Alessandro Frugis , Valentina Gioia
{"title":"应用吸附和臭氧氧化法对污水处理厂出水进行四级处理以去除新出现的污染物:实验室规模实验的结果","authors":"Agostina Chiavola ,&nbsp;Camilla Di Marcantonio ,&nbsp;Andrea Noè Porretti ,&nbsp;Sara Scagnetti ,&nbsp;Veronica Ciuchi ,&nbsp;Maria Rosaria Boni ,&nbsp;Sacha Micoli ,&nbsp;Marco Lazzazzara ,&nbsp;Simone Leoni ,&nbsp;Alessandro Frugis ,&nbsp;Valentina Gioia","doi":"10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>European legislation introduces the need for quaternary treatment processes to reduce the risk associated with residual concentrations of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) present in the final effluent of Wastewater Treatment Plants. Among the various processes evaluated for this purpose, adsorption and ozonation have demonstrated the highest removal efficiencies. This study investigated the efficiency of these processes at laboratory scale, targeting four representative CECs commonly detected in wastewater: Carbamazepine (CBZ, antiepileptic), Sulfamethoxazole (SMX, antibiotic), 1H-Benzotriazole (BTR) and 5-Methyl-1H-Benzotriazole (MBTR) (corrosion inhibitors). Experiments were conducted under different operating conditions and treatment configurations. Overall, ozonation efficiently removed all the target CECs. CBZ and SMX exhibited similar reduction trends, achieving 90% removal within the first 5 min of treatment and complete removal after 15 min, at typical ozone dosages. MBTR was also effectively degraded but at a slower rate: the complete removal was observed only after 30 min. BTR required 60 min to reach a 50% concentration reduction. The removal patterns of these CECs in the mixture closely resembled those observed in the tests where they were present alone; only MBTR degradation rate decreased appreciably. Adsorption experiments, both in batch and continuous flow applications, revealed an inverse removal affinity: BTR&gt;MBTR&gt;&gt;CBZ&gt;SMX. The Freundlich isotherm model always provided the best fitting of the batch experimental data. The Freundlich constant, K<sub>F</sub>, for benzotriazole compounds was significantly higher than for pharmaceuticals: 74.13 for BTR, 97.09 for MBTR, 18.90 for CBZ and 18.65 for SMX.</div><div>This study provides valuable insights into the comparative performance of ozonation and adsorption for CECs removal, offering critical data to support decision-making in the upgrading of wastewater treatment plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100665"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of adsorption and ozonation as quaternary treatment of WWTP effluent for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern: Results from laboratory scale experiments\",\"authors\":\"Agostina Chiavola ,&nbsp;Camilla Di Marcantonio ,&nbsp;Andrea Noè Porretti ,&nbsp;Sara Scagnetti ,&nbsp;Veronica Ciuchi ,&nbsp;Maria Rosaria Boni ,&nbsp;Sacha Micoli ,&nbsp;Marco Lazzazzara ,&nbsp;Simone Leoni ,&nbsp;Alessandro Frugis ,&nbsp;Valentina Gioia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>European legislation introduces the need for quaternary treatment processes to reduce the risk associated with residual concentrations of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) present in the final effluent of Wastewater Treatment Plants. Among the various processes evaluated for this purpose, adsorption and ozonation have demonstrated the highest removal efficiencies. This study investigated the efficiency of these processes at laboratory scale, targeting four representative CECs commonly detected in wastewater: Carbamazepine (CBZ, antiepileptic), Sulfamethoxazole (SMX, antibiotic), 1H-Benzotriazole (BTR) and 5-Methyl-1H-Benzotriazole (MBTR) (corrosion inhibitors). Experiments were conducted under different operating conditions and treatment configurations. Overall, ozonation efficiently removed all the target CECs. CBZ and SMX exhibited similar reduction trends, achieving 90% removal within the first 5 min of treatment and complete removal after 15 min, at typical ozone dosages. MBTR was also effectively degraded but at a slower rate: the complete removal was observed only after 30 min. BTR required 60 min to reach a 50% concentration reduction. The removal patterns of these CECs in the mixture closely resembled those observed in the tests where they were present alone; only MBTR degradation rate decreased appreciably. Adsorption experiments, both in batch and continuous flow applications, revealed an inverse removal affinity: BTR&gt;MBTR&gt;&gt;CBZ&gt;SMX. The Freundlich isotherm model always provided the best fitting of the batch experimental data. The Freundlich constant, K<sub>F</sub>, for benzotriazole compounds was significantly higher than for pharmaceuticals: 74.13 for BTR, 97.09 for MBTR, 18.90 for CBZ and 18.65 for SMX.</div><div>This study provides valuable insights into the comparative performance of ozonation and adsorption for CECs removal, offering critical data to support decision-making in the upgrading of wastewater treatment plants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hazardous materials advances\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hazardous materials advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625000774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625000774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲立法引入了四级处理过程的必要性,以减少与废水处理厂最终流出物中存在的新出现的关注污染物(CECs)残留浓度相关的风险。在为此目的评估的各种方法中,吸附和臭氧化已显示出最高的去除效率。本研究在实验室规模上考察了这些工艺的效率,针对废水中常见的四种代表性CECs:卡马西平(CBZ,抗癫痫药)、磺胺甲恶唑(SMX,抗生素)、1h -苯并三唑(BTR)和5-甲基- 1h -苯并三唑(MBTR)(缓蚀剂)。在不同的操作条件和处理配置下进行了实验。总体而言,臭氧化有效地去除了所有目标CECs。在典型臭氧剂量下,CBZ和SMX表现出类似的减少趋势,在处理前5分钟内达到90%的去除率,在15分钟后完全去除。MBTR也被有效降解,但速度较慢:仅在30分钟后就观察到完全去除。BTR需要60分钟才能达到50%的浓度降低。这些CECs在混合物中的去除模式与它们单独存在的测试中观察到的模式非常相似;只有MBTR降解率明显下降。在间歇式和连续流应用中,吸附实验都显示了反向的去除亲和力:BTR>;MBTR>>CBZ>;SMX。Freundlich等温线模型对批量实验数据的拟合效果最好。苯并三唑类化合物的Freundlich常数KF显著高于药物:BTR为74.13,MBTR为97.09,CBZ为18.90,SMX为18.65。本研究为臭氧氧化和吸附去除CECs的比较性能提供了有价值的见解,为支持污水处理厂升级决策提供了关键数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Application of adsorption and ozonation as quaternary treatment of WWTP effluent for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern: Results from laboratory scale experiments

Application of adsorption and ozonation as quaternary treatment of WWTP effluent for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern: Results from laboratory scale experiments
European legislation introduces the need for quaternary treatment processes to reduce the risk associated with residual concentrations of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) present in the final effluent of Wastewater Treatment Plants. Among the various processes evaluated for this purpose, adsorption and ozonation have demonstrated the highest removal efficiencies. This study investigated the efficiency of these processes at laboratory scale, targeting four representative CECs commonly detected in wastewater: Carbamazepine (CBZ, antiepileptic), Sulfamethoxazole (SMX, antibiotic), 1H-Benzotriazole (BTR) and 5-Methyl-1H-Benzotriazole (MBTR) (corrosion inhibitors). Experiments were conducted under different operating conditions and treatment configurations. Overall, ozonation efficiently removed all the target CECs. CBZ and SMX exhibited similar reduction trends, achieving 90% removal within the first 5 min of treatment and complete removal after 15 min, at typical ozone dosages. MBTR was also effectively degraded but at a slower rate: the complete removal was observed only after 30 min. BTR required 60 min to reach a 50% concentration reduction. The removal patterns of these CECs in the mixture closely resembled those observed in the tests where they were present alone; only MBTR degradation rate decreased appreciably. Adsorption experiments, both in batch and continuous flow applications, revealed an inverse removal affinity: BTR>MBTR>>CBZ>SMX. The Freundlich isotherm model always provided the best fitting of the batch experimental data. The Freundlich constant, KF, for benzotriazole compounds was significantly higher than for pharmaceuticals: 74.13 for BTR, 97.09 for MBTR, 18.90 for CBZ and 18.65 for SMX.
This study provides valuable insights into the comparative performance of ozonation and adsorption for CECs removal, offering critical data to support decision-making in the upgrading of wastewater treatment plants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hazardous materials advances
Journal of hazardous materials advances Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信