经合组织国家劳动力市场日益僵化对就业增长的影响

IF 8.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rasmus Wiese , João Tovar Jalles , Jakob de Haan
{"title":"经合组织国家劳动力市场日益僵化对就业增长的影响","authors":"Rasmus Wiese ,&nbsp;João Tovar Jalles ,&nbsp;Jakob de Haan","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines how labour market counter-reforms, i.e., measures that make it more difficult to hire and fire workers and that increase unemployment benefits, affect employment growth in 25 OECD countries. Although counter-reforms occur frequently, they have received little attention in empirical research. The theoretical effects of labour market counter-reforms on employment are ambiguous. For instance, higher firing costs may decrease employment as employers are less willing to hire. However, employment may also increase as layoffs may decline due to more stringent firing constraints. Moreover, the effects may depend on the type of contract; workers with a temporary contract have less employment protection. Increasing their protection may increase labour supply notably in an economic upswing when the labour market is tight. Our results suggest that employment protection counter-reforms for temporary workers increase employment growth when the economy is performing above trend. The effects of counter-reforms of unemployment benefits are insignificant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"85 ","pages":"Pages 2265-2275"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of increasing labour market rigidity on employment growth in OECD countries\",\"authors\":\"Rasmus Wiese ,&nbsp;João Tovar Jalles ,&nbsp;Jakob de Haan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines how labour market counter-reforms, i.e., measures that make it more difficult to hire and fire workers and that increase unemployment benefits, affect employment growth in 25 OECD countries. Although counter-reforms occur frequently, they have received little attention in empirical research. The theoretical effects of labour market counter-reforms on employment are ambiguous. For instance, higher firing costs may decrease employment as employers are less willing to hire. However, employment may also increase as layoffs may decline due to more stringent firing constraints. Moreover, the effects may depend on the type of contract; workers with a temporary contract have less employment protection. Increasing their protection may increase labour supply notably in an economic upswing when the labour market is tight. Our results suggest that employment protection counter-reforms for temporary workers increase employment growth when the economy is performing above trend. The effects of counter-reforms of unemployment benefits are insignificant.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 2265-2275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625000815\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625000815","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了25个经合组织国家的劳动力市场反改革(即使雇用和解雇工人变得更加困难和增加失业救济金的措施)如何影响就业增长。虽然反改革时有发生,但在实证研究中很少受到重视。劳动力市场反改革对就业的理论影响是模糊的。例如,更高的解雇成本可能会减少就业,因为雇主不太愿意招聘。然而,由于更严格的解雇限制,裁员可能会减少,就业也可能增加。此外,影响可能取决于合同的类型;签订临时合同的工人得到的就业保护较少。增加对他们的保护可能会增加劳动力供应,特别是在劳动力市场紧张的经济上升时期。我们的研究结果表明,当经济表现在上述趋势时,临时工的就业保护反改革促进了就业增长。失业救济反改革的效果是微不足道的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of increasing labour market rigidity on employment growth in OECD countries
This paper examines how labour market counter-reforms, i.e., measures that make it more difficult to hire and fire workers and that increase unemployment benefits, affect employment growth in 25 OECD countries. Although counter-reforms occur frequently, they have received little attention in empirical research. The theoretical effects of labour market counter-reforms on employment are ambiguous. For instance, higher firing costs may decrease employment as employers are less willing to hire. However, employment may also increase as layoffs may decline due to more stringent firing constraints. Moreover, the effects may depend on the type of contract; workers with a temporary contract have less employment protection. Increasing their protection may increase labour supply notably in an economic upswing when the labour market is tight. Our results suggest that employment protection counter-reforms for temporary workers increase employment growth when the economy is performing above trend. The effects of counter-reforms of unemployment benefits are insignificant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信