Mathew I.B. Debenham , Emmanuel Ogalo , Harvey Wu , Christopher Doherty , Sean Bristol , Erin Brown , Daniel W. Stashuk , Michael J. Berger
{"title":"评估神经移植手术后运动单元的特性","authors":"Mathew I.B. Debenham , Emmanuel Ogalo , Harvey Wu , Christopher Doherty , Sean Bristol , Erin Brown , Daniel W. Stashuk , Michael J. Berger","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2025.123438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nerve transfer surgery (NTS) shows promise in restoring movement to muscles paralyzed by spinal cord (SCI) and peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Yet, motor outcomes vary, and the neurophysiological factors influencing responders and non-responders remain unclear. As the fundamental goal of NTS is to reinnervate paralyzed muscles by creating new motor units (MUs), we examined MU properties after NTS for individuals with SCI and PNI. Nine participants (3 SCI, 6 PNI, 50.3 ± 13.9 years) >18 months post-NTS were evaluated and compared to either age-matched controls (SCI) or the contralateral limb (PNI). We used a sophisticated, signal processing software known as Decomposition-Based Quantitative Electromyography (DQEMG) and near-fiber EMG to examine MU characteristics sampled from needle electromyography signals recorded during low-intensity contractions. The NTS muscle MU potentials (MUP) were larger, and near-fiber MUPs (NFM) were more temporal dispersed than controls. Measures of neuromuscular junction instability were greater in NTS muscles compared to controls (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Firing rates of MU, and MUP phases and turns were not different between groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Overall, these data suggest the quality of reinnervation post-surgery requires further investigation as a potential mediator of motor outcome and the required time for successful reinnervation may be longer than currently predicted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":"472 ","pages":"Article 123438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating motor unit properties after nerve transfer surgery\",\"authors\":\"Mathew I.B. Debenham , Emmanuel Ogalo , Harvey Wu , Christopher Doherty , Sean Bristol , Erin Brown , Daniel W. Stashuk , Michael J. Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jns.2025.123438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nerve transfer surgery (NTS) shows promise in restoring movement to muscles paralyzed by spinal cord (SCI) and peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Yet, motor outcomes vary, and the neurophysiological factors influencing responders and non-responders remain unclear. As the fundamental goal of NTS is to reinnervate paralyzed muscles by creating new motor units (MUs), we examined MU properties after NTS for individuals with SCI and PNI. Nine participants (3 SCI, 6 PNI, 50.3 ± 13.9 years) >18 months post-NTS were evaluated and compared to either age-matched controls (SCI) or the contralateral limb (PNI). We used a sophisticated, signal processing software known as Decomposition-Based Quantitative Electromyography (DQEMG) and near-fiber EMG to examine MU characteristics sampled from needle electromyography signals recorded during low-intensity contractions. The NTS muscle MU potentials (MUP) were larger, and near-fiber MUPs (NFM) were more temporal dispersed than controls. Measures of neuromuscular junction instability were greater in NTS muscles compared to controls (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Firing rates of MU, and MUP phases and turns were not different between groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Overall, these data suggest the quality of reinnervation post-surgery requires further investigation as a potential mediator of motor outcome and the required time for successful reinnervation may be longer than currently predicted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"472 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X25000553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X25000553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating motor unit properties after nerve transfer surgery
Nerve transfer surgery (NTS) shows promise in restoring movement to muscles paralyzed by spinal cord (SCI) and peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Yet, motor outcomes vary, and the neurophysiological factors influencing responders and non-responders remain unclear. As the fundamental goal of NTS is to reinnervate paralyzed muscles by creating new motor units (MUs), we examined MU properties after NTS for individuals with SCI and PNI. Nine participants (3 SCI, 6 PNI, 50.3 ± 13.9 years) >18 months post-NTS were evaluated and compared to either age-matched controls (SCI) or the contralateral limb (PNI). We used a sophisticated, signal processing software known as Decomposition-Based Quantitative Electromyography (DQEMG) and near-fiber EMG to examine MU characteristics sampled from needle electromyography signals recorded during low-intensity contractions. The NTS muscle MU potentials (MUP) were larger, and near-fiber MUPs (NFM) were more temporal dispersed than controls. Measures of neuromuscular junction instability were greater in NTS muscles compared to controls (p < 0.05). Firing rates of MU, and MUP phases and turns were not different between groups (p > 0.05). Overall, these data suggest the quality of reinnervation post-surgery requires further investigation as a potential mediator of motor outcome and the required time for successful reinnervation may be longer than currently predicted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials).
JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.