封闭社区中适得其反的惩罚:来自日本渔业的实验证据

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jun Goto , Takahiro Matsui
{"title":"封闭社区中适得其反的惩罚:来自日本渔业的实验证据","authors":"Jun Goto ,&nbsp;Takahiro Matsui","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since Hardin (1968) emphasized the fundamental difficulties of common pool re- source (CPR) management, social scientists have been struggling to find a way of mitigating a free-riding problem in social dilemma situations. Empirical evidence based on a public goods experiment demonstrates that introducing a punishment opportunity among subjects successfully solves the free-riding problem. However, few studies investigate whether the effectiveness of such a punishment option varies with community network structures. To examine this aspect, we targeted 10 Japanese fishing communities and conducted public goods games. During the course of the experiments, we exogenously changed the rule of the game and introduced pun- ishment opportunities. Adopting the difference-in-differences strategy, we compare individual contributions between closed and open community structures before and after the introduction of the punishment opportunity. Estimation results find that the punishment option is counterproductive in the closed communities because it crowds out existing cooperative norms. This implies that policies without considering local community structures may exacerbate CPR management problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counterproductive punishment in closed communities: Experimental evidence from Japanese fishery\",\"authors\":\"Jun Goto ,&nbsp;Takahiro Matsui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Since Hardin (1968) emphasized the fundamental difficulties of common pool re- source (CPR) management, social scientists have been struggling to find a way of mitigating a free-riding problem in social dilemma situations. Empirical evidence based on a public goods experiment demonstrates that introducing a punishment opportunity among subjects successfully solves the free-riding problem. However, few studies investigate whether the effectiveness of such a punishment option varies with community network structures. To examine this aspect, we targeted 10 Japanese fishing communities and conducted public goods games. During the course of the experiments, we exogenously changed the rule of the game and introduced pun- ishment opportunities. Adopting the difference-in-differences strategy, we compare individual contributions between closed and open community structures before and after the introduction of the punishment opportunity. Estimation results find that the punishment option is counterproductive in the closed communities because it crowds out existing cooperative norms. This implies that policies without considering local community structures may exacerbate CPR management problems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"177 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004937\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从哈丁(1968)强调公共资源管理的根本困难以来,社会科学家一直在努力寻找一种方法来减轻社会困境中的搭便车问题。基于公共物品实验的经验证据表明,在主体之间引入惩罚机会可以成功地解决搭便车问题。然而,很少有研究调查这种惩罚选择的有效性是否随社区网络结构而变化。为了检验这一点,我们针对10个日本渔业社区进行了公共物品游戏。在实验过程中,我们外源性地改变了游戏规则,引入了双关语的机会。采用差异中的差异策略,我们比较了引入惩罚机会前后封闭和开放社区结构之间的个体贡献。估计结果发现,惩罚选项在封闭社区中是适得其反的,因为它排挤了现有的合作规范。这意味着不考虑当地社区结构的政策可能会加剧心肺复苏管理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Counterproductive punishment in closed communities: Experimental evidence from Japanese fishery
Since Hardin (1968) emphasized the fundamental difficulties of common pool re- source (CPR) management, social scientists have been struggling to find a way of mitigating a free-riding problem in social dilemma situations. Empirical evidence based on a public goods experiment demonstrates that introducing a punishment opportunity among subjects successfully solves the free-riding problem. However, few studies investigate whether the effectiveness of such a punishment option varies with community network structures. To examine this aspect, we targeted 10 Japanese fishing communities and conducted public goods games. During the course of the experiments, we exogenously changed the rule of the game and introduced pun- ishment opportunities. Adopting the difference-in-differences strategy, we compare individual contributions between closed and open community structures before and after the introduction of the punishment opportunity. Estimation results find that the punishment option is counterproductive in the closed communities because it crowds out existing cooperative norms. This implies that policies without considering local community structures may exacerbate CPR management problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信