花园考古:维苏威地区 20 世纪 30-80 年代的光与影

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Chiara Romano , Lluís Pons Pujol
{"title":"花园考古:维苏威地区 20 世纪 30-80 年代的光与影","authors":"Chiara Romano ,&nbsp;Lluís Pons Pujol","doi":"10.1016/j.quaint.2025.109714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>From an archaeological-conceptual perspective, the Roman garden can be considered a holistic artifact, a multifaceted representation of its society, and as such, it serves as a significant source of historical data. This statement is supported by considerations regarding the study of a garden. Indeed, when assessing a garden, it is essential to consider not only its physical characteristics but also the role of human intervention over time in modifying it. Consequently, it would be a misstep to study the garden only in its final phase which actually is the predominant approach in archaeology. Instead, it is imperative to perceive the Roman garden as a dynamic, holistic entity that has undergone continuous transformation.</div><div>Archaeobotany has found fertile ground in the Vesuvian area thanks to the exceptional burial conditions of the region's archaeological sites. In this study, we propose some reflections on the contributions of the two most seminal scholars in the field, Amedeo Maiuri and Wilhelmina Jashesmki. These scholars pioneered the integration of archaeology and botany, a concept that has come to be known as “Garden Archaeology”, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses with the eyes of modern researchers. A major aim of the present paper is to provide a balanced assessment of the merits and limitations of this approach.</div><div>Maiuri began to pay close attention to the diverse plant elements that were revealed during the archaeological excavations. In the reconstructions of the green areas, he attempted to insert plants that could approach the ancient flora, favouring the native species. The advancement of botanical techniques, compared to those available to Maiuri, greatly facilitated Jashemski's works, which rely on the idea that multidisciplinarity is a key word in Garden Archaeology.</div><div>The present paper will examine these issues by presenting the results obtained from the re-reading and in-depth examination of the study of Amedeo Maiuri's diaries of excavation, Wilhelmina Jashemski's memories, and modern scholars' accounts and comments on their activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49644,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary International","volume":"724 ","pages":"Article 109714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Garden Archaeology: Lights and shadows of the 30s–80s of the 20th century in the Vesuvian area\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Romano ,&nbsp;Lluís Pons Pujol\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.quaint.2025.109714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>From an archaeological-conceptual perspective, the Roman garden can be considered a holistic artifact, a multifaceted representation of its society, and as such, it serves as a significant source of historical data. This statement is supported by considerations regarding the study of a garden. Indeed, when assessing a garden, it is essential to consider not only its physical characteristics but also the role of human intervention over time in modifying it. Consequently, it would be a misstep to study the garden only in its final phase which actually is the predominant approach in archaeology. Instead, it is imperative to perceive the Roman garden as a dynamic, holistic entity that has undergone continuous transformation.</div><div>Archaeobotany has found fertile ground in the Vesuvian area thanks to the exceptional burial conditions of the region's archaeological sites. In this study, we propose some reflections on the contributions of the two most seminal scholars in the field, Amedeo Maiuri and Wilhelmina Jashesmki. These scholars pioneered the integration of archaeology and botany, a concept that has come to be known as “Garden Archaeology”, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses with the eyes of modern researchers. A major aim of the present paper is to provide a balanced assessment of the merits and limitations of this approach.</div><div>Maiuri began to pay close attention to the diverse plant elements that were revealed during the archaeological excavations. In the reconstructions of the green areas, he attempted to insert plants that could approach the ancient flora, favouring the native species. The advancement of botanical techniques, compared to those available to Maiuri, greatly facilitated Jashemski's works, which rely on the idea that multidisciplinarity is a key word in Garden Archaeology.</div><div>The present paper will examine these issues by presenting the results obtained from the re-reading and in-depth examination of the study of Amedeo Maiuri's diaries of excavation, Wilhelmina Jashemski's memories, and modern scholars' accounts and comments on their activities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaternary International\",\"volume\":\"724 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaternary International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618225000576\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618225000576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从考古学概念的角度来看,罗马花园可以被认为是一个整体的人工制品,是其社会的多方面代表,因此,它是历史数据的重要来源。这一说法得到了关于花园研究的考虑的支持。事实上,在评估一个花园时,不仅要考虑它的物理特征,还要考虑人类干预在改变它的过程中所起的作用。因此,只在最后阶段研究花园是错误的,而这实际上是考古学中主要的方法。相反,必须将罗马花园视为一个动态的、整体的实体,它经历了不断的转变。由于该地区考古遗址的特殊埋葬条件,考古植物学在维苏威地区发现了肥沃的土壤。在本研究中,我们对该领域两位最具影响力的学者Amedeo Maiuri和Wilhelmina Jashesmki的贡献提出了一些反思。这些学者率先将考古学与植物学相结合,这一概念后来被称为“园林考古学”,以现代研究者的眼光来突出其优缺点。本文的一个主要目的是对这种方法的优点和局限性进行平衡的评估。迈乌里开始密切关注考古发掘过程中发现的各种植物元素。在重建绿地的过程中,他试图插入能够接近古代植物区系的植物,偏爱本地物种。与迈乌里相比,植物学技术的进步极大地促进了贾希姆斯基的工作,他的工作依赖于多学科是花园考古学的一个关键词。本文将通过重新阅读和深入研究Amedeo Maiuri的挖掘日记、Wilhelmina Jashemski的记忆以及现代学者对其活动的描述和评论来研究这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Garden Archaeology: Lights and shadows of the 30s–80s of the 20th century in the Vesuvian area
From an archaeological-conceptual perspective, the Roman garden can be considered a holistic artifact, a multifaceted representation of its society, and as such, it serves as a significant source of historical data. This statement is supported by considerations regarding the study of a garden. Indeed, when assessing a garden, it is essential to consider not only its physical characteristics but also the role of human intervention over time in modifying it. Consequently, it would be a misstep to study the garden only in its final phase which actually is the predominant approach in archaeology. Instead, it is imperative to perceive the Roman garden as a dynamic, holistic entity that has undergone continuous transformation.
Archaeobotany has found fertile ground in the Vesuvian area thanks to the exceptional burial conditions of the region's archaeological sites. In this study, we propose some reflections on the contributions of the two most seminal scholars in the field, Amedeo Maiuri and Wilhelmina Jashesmki. These scholars pioneered the integration of archaeology and botany, a concept that has come to be known as “Garden Archaeology”, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses with the eyes of modern researchers. A major aim of the present paper is to provide a balanced assessment of the merits and limitations of this approach.
Maiuri began to pay close attention to the diverse plant elements that were revealed during the archaeological excavations. In the reconstructions of the green areas, he attempted to insert plants that could approach the ancient flora, favouring the native species. The advancement of botanical techniques, compared to those available to Maiuri, greatly facilitated Jashemski's works, which rely on the idea that multidisciplinarity is a key word in Garden Archaeology.
The present paper will examine these issues by presenting the results obtained from the re-reading and in-depth examination of the study of Amedeo Maiuri's diaries of excavation, Wilhelmina Jashemski's memories, and modern scholars' accounts and comments on their activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaternary International
Quaternary International 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
336
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Quaternary International is the official journal of the International Union for Quaternary Research. The objectives are to publish a high quality scientific journal under the auspices of the premier Quaternary association that reflects the interdisciplinary nature of INQUA and records recent advances in Quaternary science that appeal to a wide audience. This series will encompass all the full spectrum of the physical and natural sciences that are commonly employed in solving Quaternary problems. The policy is to publish peer refereed collected research papers from symposia, workshops and meetings sponsored by INQUA. In addition, other organizations may request publication of their collected works pertaining to the Quaternary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信