开发基于场景的在线工具,使研究参与和公众参与囊性纤维化新生儿筛查:混合方法研究。

Q2 Medicine
Louise Moody, Samantha Clarke, Matt Compton, Rachael Hughson-Gill, Felicity Boardman, Corinna Clark, Pru Holder, James R Bonham, Jane Chudleigh
{"title":"开发基于场景的在线工具,使研究参与和公众参与囊性纤维化新生儿筛查:混合方法研究。","authors":"Louise Moody, Samantha Clarke, Matt Compton, Rachael Hughson-Gill, Felicity Boardman, Corinna Clark, Pru Holder, James R Bonham, Jane Chudleigh","doi":"10.2196/59686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborn screening aims to identify babies affected by rare but serious genetic conditions. As technology advances, there is the potential to expand the newborn screening program following evaluation of the likely benefits and drawbacks. To inform these decisions, it is important to consider the family experience of screening and the views of the public. Engaging in public dialogue can be difficult. The conditions, screening processes, and associated moral and ethical considerations are complex.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop a stand-alone online resource to enable a range of stakeholders to understand whether and how next-generation sequencing should be incorporated into the CF screening algorithm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Around 4 development workshops with policymakers, parents, and other stakeholders informed the design of an interactive activity, including the structure, content, and questions posed. Stakeholders were recruited to take part in the development workshops via purposeful and snowball sampling methods to achieve a diversity of views across roles and organizations, with email invitations sent to representative individuals with lived, clinical, and academic experience related to CF and screening. Ten stakeholders informed the development process including those with lived experience of CF (2/10, 20%), clinicians (2/10, 20%), and representatives from relevant government, charity, and research organizations (6/10, 60%). Vignettes constructed using interview data and translated into scripts were recorded to provide short films to represent and provoke consideration of families' experiences. Participants were recruited (n=6, adults older than 18 years) to test the resulting resource. Study advertisements were circulated via physical posters and digital newsletters to recruit participants who self-identified as having a reading difficulty or having English as a second language.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An open access online resource, \"Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: You Decide,\" was developed and usability and acceptability tested to provide the \"user\" (eg, a parent, the general public, or a health care professional) with an interactive scenario-based presentation of the potential outcomes of extended genetic testing, allowing them to visualize the impact on families. This included a learning workbook that explains key concepts and processes. The resulting tool facilitates public engagement with and understanding of complex genetic and screening concepts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online resources such as the one developed during this work have the potential to help people form considered views and facilitate access to the perspectives of parents and the wider public on genetic testing. These may be otherwise difficult to obtain but are of importance to health care professionals and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06299566; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06299566.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"e59686"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an Online Scenario-Based Tool to Enable Research Participation and Public Engagement in Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: Mixed Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Louise Moody, Samantha Clarke, Matt Compton, Rachael Hughson-Gill, Felicity Boardman, Corinna Clark, Pru Holder, James R Bonham, Jane Chudleigh\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/59686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborn screening aims to identify babies affected by rare but serious genetic conditions. As technology advances, there is the potential to expand the newborn screening program following evaluation of the likely benefits and drawbacks. To inform these decisions, it is important to consider the family experience of screening and the views of the public. Engaging in public dialogue can be difficult. The conditions, screening processes, and associated moral and ethical considerations are complex.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop a stand-alone online resource to enable a range of stakeholders to understand whether and how next-generation sequencing should be incorporated into the CF screening algorithm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Around 4 development workshops with policymakers, parents, and other stakeholders informed the design of an interactive activity, including the structure, content, and questions posed. Stakeholders were recruited to take part in the development workshops via purposeful and snowball sampling methods to achieve a diversity of views across roles and organizations, with email invitations sent to representative individuals with lived, clinical, and academic experience related to CF and screening. Ten stakeholders informed the development process including those with lived experience of CF (2/10, 20%), clinicians (2/10, 20%), and representatives from relevant government, charity, and research organizations (6/10, 60%). Vignettes constructed using interview data and translated into scripts were recorded to provide short films to represent and provoke consideration of families' experiences. Participants were recruited (n=6, adults older than 18 years) to test the resulting resource. Study advertisements were circulated via physical posters and digital newsletters to recruit participants who self-identified as having a reading difficulty or having English as a second language.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An open access online resource, \\\"Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: You Decide,\\\" was developed and usability and acceptability tested to provide the \\\"user\\\" (eg, a parent, the general public, or a health care professional) with an interactive scenario-based presentation of the potential outcomes of extended genetic testing, allowing them to visualize the impact on families. This included a learning workbook that explains key concepts and processes. The resulting tool facilitates public engagement with and understanding of complex genetic and screening concepts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online resources such as the one developed during this work have the potential to help people form considered views and facilitate access to the perspectives of parents and the wider public on genetic testing. These may be otherwise difficult to obtain but are of importance to health care professionals and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06299566; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06299566.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Participatory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"e59686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926439/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Participatory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/59686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿筛查旨在识别受罕见但严重遗传疾病影响的婴儿。随着技术的进步,在对可能的利弊进行评估后,有可能扩大新生儿筛查项目。在做出这些决定时,重要的是要考虑家庭接受筛查的经历和公众的意见。参与公共对话可能很困难。条件、筛选过程以及相关的道德和伦理考虑是复杂的。目的:本研究旨在开发一个独立的在线资源,以使一系列利益相关者了解是否以及如何将下一代测序纳入CF筛选算法。方法:与政策制定者、家长和其他利益相关者一起举办了大约4次发展研讨会,介绍了互动活动的设计,包括结构、内容和提出的问题。通过有目的的滚雪球抽样方法,招募利益相关者参加开发研讨会,以实现跨角色和组织的观点多样性,并向具有与CF和筛查相关的生活、临床和学术经验的代表性个人发送电子邮件邀请。10个利益相关者告知了开发过程,包括有CF生活经验的人(2/ 10,20 %)、临床医生(2/ 10,20 %)和相关政府、慈善机构和研究组织的代表(6/ 10,60 %)。使用访谈数据构建并翻译成脚本的小片段被记录下来,以提供短片来代表和引发对家庭经历的思考。参与者被招募(n=6, 18岁以上的成年人)来测试所得资源。研究广告通过实体海报和电子通讯传播,招募自称有阅读困难或英语为第二语言的参与者。结果:开发了一个开放获取的在线资源“囊性纤维化新生儿筛查:由你决定”,并对其可用性和可接受性进行了测试,为“用户”(如父母、公众或卫生保健专业人员)提供了基于场景的交互式演示,展示了扩展基因检测的潜在结果,使他们能够可视化地了解对家庭的影响。其中包括一本解释关键概念和过程的学习手册。由此产生的工具有助于公众参与和理解复杂的遗传和筛选概念。结论:在这项工作中开发的在线资源有可能帮助人们形成经过深思熟虑的观点,并促进获得父母和更广泛公众对基因检测的观点。这些可能很难获得,但对卫生保健专业人员和政策制定者很重要。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06299566;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06299566。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of an Online Scenario-Based Tool to Enable Research Participation and Public Engagement in Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: Mixed Methods Study.

Background: Newborn screening aims to identify babies affected by rare but serious genetic conditions. As technology advances, there is the potential to expand the newborn screening program following evaluation of the likely benefits and drawbacks. To inform these decisions, it is important to consider the family experience of screening and the views of the public. Engaging in public dialogue can be difficult. The conditions, screening processes, and associated moral and ethical considerations are complex.

Objective: This study aims to develop a stand-alone online resource to enable a range of stakeholders to understand whether and how next-generation sequencing should be incorporated into the CF screening algorithm.

Methods: Around 4 development workshops with policymakers, parents, and other stakeholders informed the design of an interactive activity, including the structure, content, and questions posed. Stakeholders were recruited to take part in the development workshops via purposeful and snowball sampling methods to achieve a diversity of views across roles and organizations, with email invitations sent to representative individuals with lived, clinical, and academic experience related to CF and screening. Ten stakeholders informed the development process including those with lived experience of CF (2/10, 20%), clinicians (2/10, 20%), and representatives from relevant government, charity, and research organizations (6/10, 60%). Vignettes constructed using interview data and translated into scripts were recorded to provide short films to represent and provoke consideration of families' experiences. Participants were recruited (n=6, adults older than 18 years) to test the resulting resource. Study advertisements were circulated via physical posters and digital newsletters to recruit participants who self-identified as having a reading difficulty or having English as a second language.

Results: An open access online resource, "Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: You Decide," was developed and usability and acceptability tested to provide the "user" (eg, a parent, the general public, or a health care professional) with an interactive scenario-based presentation of the potential outcomes of extended genetic testing, allowing them to visualize the impact on families. This included a learning workbook that explains key concepts and processes. The resulting tool facilitates public engagement with and understanding of complex genetic and screening concepts.

Conclusions: Online resources such as the one developed during this work have the potential to help people form considered views and facilitate access to the perspectives of parents and the wider public on genetic testing. These may be otherwise difficult to obtain but are of importance to health care professionals and policymakers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06299566; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06299566.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信