侵袭骶骨的晚期结直肠癌整体切除加骶骨切除术后的预后:一项多机构描述性系列研究。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Thomas A Pieters, Andrew M Hersh, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Zach Pennington, Gabrielle Santangelo, Salem Najjar, Bethany Hung, Roee Ber, Chady Atallah, Jonathan Efron, Susan Gearhart, Bashar Safar, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Daniel M Sciubba, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo
{"title":"侵袭骶骨的晚期结直肠癌整体切除加骶骨切除术后的预后:一项多机构描述性系列研究。","authors":"Thomas A Pieters, Andrew M Hersh, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Zach Pennington, Gabrielle Santangelo, Salem Najjar, Bethany Hung, Roee Ber, Chady Atallah, Jonathan Efron, Susan Gearhart, Bashar Safar, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Daniel M Sciubba, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.SPINE24391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Management of locally invasive colorectal carcinoma at any stage currently involves surgical excision followed by chemoradiotherapy; however, the prognosis is poor, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of only 5%. Failure to achieve gross-total resection is associated with poorer OS, and patients with residual tumor postresection (R1 or R2 resection) have a median OS of 7 months compared with 23 months in those who undergo resection with negative margins (R0 resection). For tumors that have invaded the sacrum, sacrectomy becomes necessary to achieve R0 resection. The objective of this study was to provide a descriptive multicenter account of resection for locally invasive colorectal carcinoma with sacral invasion, focusing on the association of tumor morphometry with surgical planning and perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic, comorbidity, clinical, tumor-specific, operative characteristic, and outcome data were collected on all patients who underwent resection of colorectal carcinoma with concurrent sacral resection between January 2005 and May 2022. Patients were grouped into those having undergone surgery for purely palliative intent, or those with resection with attempt at local control and dichotomized into level of osteotomy (either proximal or distal to the S2-3 level).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients (median age 50.5 [IQR 43.3-60.0] years, 54.5% female) underwent sacrectomy for colorectal carcinoma. Operative records indicated intent for local control in 14 patients and palliative in the remaining 8 patients. Palliative surgical intent was based primarily on the presence of distant metastases. There was no significant difference in median local progression-free survival between patients undergoing osteotomy proximal to the S2-3 level and those undergoing osteotomy distal to the S2-3 level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>En bloc resection is believed to offer the best local control in patients with locally invasive colorectal carcinoma. The present descriptive series highlights outcomes of en bloc resection with partial or full sacrectomy in patients with tumors showing local extension into the sacrum. Complications are common, most often in the form of wound dehiscence or infection, and many patients require placement in a rehabilitation or intermediate-care facility upon discharge. However, for those with stage III (locally aggressive) disease, median OS exceeds 16 years, suggesting that such aggressive management with en bloc resection may be warranted in properly selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes after en bloc resection with sacrectomy of advanced colorectal carcinomas that invade the sacrum: a multiinstitutional descriptive series.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Pieters, Andrew M Hersh, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Zach Pennington, Gabrielle Santangelo, Salem Najjar, Bethany Hung, Roee Ber, Chady Atallah, Jonathan Efron, Susan Gearhart, Bashar Safar, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Daniel M Sciubba, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.10.SPINE24391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Management of locally invasive colorectal carcinoma at any stage currently involves surgical excision followed by chemoradiotherapy; however, the prognosis is poor, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of only 5%. Failure to achieve gross-total resection is associated with poorer OS, and patients with residual tumor postresection (R1 or R2 resection) have a median OS of 7 months compared with 23 months in those who undergo resection with negative margins (R0 resection). For tumors that have invaded the sacrum, sacrectomy becomes necessary to achieve R0 resection. The objective of this study was to provide a descriptive multicenter account of resection for locally invasive colorectal carcinoma with sacral invasion, focusing on the association of tumor morphometry with surgical planning and perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic, comorbidity, clinical, tumor-specific, operative characteristic, and outcome data were collected on all patients who underwent resection of colorectal carcinoma with concurrent sacral resection between January 2005 and May 2022. Patients were grouped into those having undergone surgery for purely palliative intent, or those with resection with attempt at local control and dichotomized into level of osteotomy (either proximal or distal to the S2-3 level).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients (median age 50.5 [IQR 43.3-60.0] years, 54.5% female) underwent sacrectomy for colorectal carcinoma. Operative records indicated intent for local control in 14 patients and palliative in the remaining 8 patients. Palliative surgical intent was based primarily on the presence of distant metastases. There was no significant difference in median local progression-free survival between patients undergoing osteotomy proximal to the S2-3 level and those undergoing osteotomy distal to the S2-3 level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>En bloc resection is believed to offer the best local control in patients with locally invasive colorectal carcinoma. The present descriptive series highlights outcomes of en bloc resection with partial or full sacrectomy in patients with tumors showing local extension into the sacrum. Complications are common, most often in the form of wound dehiscence or infection, and many patients require placement in a rehabilitation or intermediate-care facility upon discharge. However, for those with stage III (locally aggressive) disease, median OS exceeds 16 years, suggesting that such aggressive management with en bloc resection may be warranted in properly selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.SPINE24391\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.SPINE24391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前,局部侵袭性结直肠癌的任何阶段的治疗都是手术切除加放化疗;然而,预后差,5年总生存率(OS)仅为5%。未能实现总切除与较差的OS相关,切除后残留肿瘤(R1或R2切除)的患者的中位OS为7个月,而切除阴性边缘(R0切除)的患者为23个月。对于侵犯骶骨的肿瘤,必须进行骶骨切除术以实现R0切除术。本研究的目的是提供一个描述性的多中心报道局部侵袭性结直肠癌伴骶骨侵犯的切除术,重点关注肿瘤形态测量与手术计划和围手术期结果的关系。方法:收集2005年1月至2022年5月期间所有行大肠癌切除术合并骶骨切除术患者的人口学、合并症、临床、肿瘤特异性、手术特征和结局数据。患者分为单纯姑息性手术患者和局部控制切除患者,并分为截骨水平(近端或远端至S2-3水平)。结果:22例结直肠癌患者行骶骨切除术,中位年龄50.5 [IQR 43.3-60.0]岁,女性54.5%。手术记录显示14例患者为局部控制,其余8例患者为姑息治疗。姑息性手术的目的主要是基于远处转移的存在。在S2-3节段近端截骨术患者和S2-3节段远端截骨术患者的中位局部无进展生存期无显著差异。结论:整体切除被认为是局部侵袭性结直肠癌患者的最佳局部控制方法。目前的描述系列强调了肿瘤局部延伸到骶骨的患者整体切除部分或全部骶骨切除术的结果。并发症很常见,最常见的形式是伤口裂开或感染,许多患者出院后需要安置在康复或中级护理机构。然而,对于那些III期(局部侵袭性)疾病,中位OS超过16年,这表明在适当选择的患者中,采用整体切除的积极治疗是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes after en bloc resection with sacrectomy of advanced colorectal carcinomas that invade the sacrum: a multiinstitutional descriptive series.

Objective: Management of locally invasive colorectal carcinoma at any stage currently involves surgical excision followed by chemoradiotherapy; however, the prognosis is poor, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of only 5%. Failure to achieve gross-total resection is associated with poorer OS, and patients with residual tumor postresection (R1 or R2 resection) have a median OS of 7 months compared with 23 months in those who undergo resection with negative margins (R0 resection). For tumors that have invaded the sacrum, sacrectomy becomes necessary to achieve R0 resection. The objective of this study was to provide a descriptive multicenter account of resection for locally invasive colorectal carcinoma with sacral invasion, focusing on the association of tumor morphometry with surgical planning and perioperative outcomes.

Methods: Demographic, comorbidity, clinical, tumor-specific, operative characteristic, and outcome data were collected on all patients who underwent resection of colorectal carcinoma with concurrent sacral resection between January 2005 and May 2022. Patients were grouped into those having undergone surgery for purely palliative intent, or those with resection with attempt at local control and dichotomized into level of osteotomy (either proximal or distal to the S2-3 level).

Results: Twenty-two patients (median age 50.5 [IQR 43.3-60.0] years, 54.5% female) underwent sacrectomy for colorectal carcinoma. Operative records indicated intent for local control in 14 patients and palliative in the remaining 8 patients. Palliative surgical intent was based primarily on the presence of distant metastases. There was no significant difference in median local progression-free survival between patients undergoing osteotomy proximal to the S2-3 level and those undergoing osteotomy distal to the S2-3 level.

Conclusions: En bloc resection is believed to offer the best local control in patients with locally invasive colorectal carcinoma. The present descriptive series highlights outcomes of en bloc resection with partial or full sacrectomy in patients with tumors showing local extension into the sacrum. Complications are common, most often in the form of wound dehiscence or infection, and many patients require placement in a rehabilitation or intermediate-care facility upon discharge. However, for those with stage III (locally aggressive) disease, median OS exceeds 16 years, suggesting that such aggressive management with en bloc resection may be warranted in properly selected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信