Felipe Gutierrez Pineda, Brodus A Franklin, Anuraag Punukollu, Hsien-Chung Chen, Gustavo Giraldo Garcia, Anna Lydia Machado Silva, Mark Proctor, Esteban Quiceno
{"title":"非综合征性多缝合线缝合手术入路的比较分析:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Felipe Gutierrez Pineda, Brodus A Franklin, Anuraag Punukollu, Hsien-Chung Chen, Gustavo Giraldo Garcia, Anna Lydia Machado Silva, Mark Proctor, Esteban Quiceno","doi":"10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nonsyndromic multiple-suture synostosis (MSS) is one of the rarest types of craniosynostosis. While both endoscopic and open surgical approaches have demonstrated efficacy for MSS patients, a comprehensive comparison of perioperative outcomes between the two approaches has yet to be fully explored. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the available evidence among the two surgical approaches to better inform the management of complex craniosynostosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published from the first reports through February 2024 that reported surgical outcomes of either endoscopic or open surgery for nonsyndromic MSS. The main outcome was the reoperation rate, with secondary endpoints including transfusion rates, intraoperative complications, and overall complications, with a subgroup analysis conducted for patients with nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies involving 310 patients were analyzed. Patients undergoing open surgery were older than those treated with endoscopy (mean age 10.39 vs 3.21 months). The pooled analysis showed a reoperation rate of 11% (95% CI 4%-23%, I2 = 25%) for endoscopic surgery compared with 22% (95% CI 14%-31%, I2 = 0) for open surgery (p = 0.11). Transfusion rates were 26% (95% CI 13%-45%, I2 = 50%) for endoscopic surgery and 50% (95% CI 22%-78%, I2 = 71%) for open surgery (p = 0.18). Intraoperative complications were similar: 17% (95% CI 7%-34%, I2 = 0%) for endoscopic vs 15% (95% CI 4%-42%, I2 = 76%) for open surgery (p = 0.85). Overall complication rates were 15% (95% CI 7%-31%, I2 = 45%) for endoscopic surgery and 20% (95% CI 9%-38%, I2 = 65%) for open surgery (p = 0.59). In the subgroup analysis of bicoronal synostosis, the reoperation rate was 10% (95% CI 4%-21%, I2 = 0%) for endoscopic surgery versus 16% (95% CI 7%-32%, I2 = 0%) for open surgery (p = 0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While both surgical approaches are reasonable options for nonsyndromic MSS, this meta-analysis suggests that endoscopic surgery could be associated with lower morbidity when compared with open surgery. Future studies with longer follow-up periods will be needed to validate these findings and contribute to the understanding of complex craniosynostosis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"449-459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of surgical approaches in nonsyndromic multiple-suture synostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Gutierrez Pineda, Brodus A Franklin, Anuraag Punukollu, Hsien-Chung Chen, Gustavo Giraldo Garcia, Anna Lydia Machado Silva, Mark Proctor, Esteban Quiceno\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nonsyndromic multiple-suture synostosis (MSS) is one of the rarest types of craniosynostosis. While both endoscopic and open surgical approaches have demonstrated efficacy for MSS patients, a comprehensive comparison of perioperative outcomes between the two approaches has yet to be fully explored. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the available evidence among the two surgical approaches to better inform the management of complex craniosynostosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published from the first reports through February 2024 that reported surgical outcomes of either endoscopic or open surgery for nonsyndromic MSS. The main outcome was the reoperation rate, with secondary endpoints including transfusion rates, intraoperative complications, and overall complications, with a subgroup analysis conducted for patients with nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies involving 310 patients were analyzed. Patients undergoing open surgery were older than those treated with endoscopy (mean age 10.39 vs 3.21 months). The pooled analysis showed a reoperation rate of 11% (95% CI 4%-23%, I2 = 25%) for endoscopic surgery compared with 22% (95% CI 14%-31%, I2 = 0) for open surgery (p = 0.11). Transfusion rates were 26% (95% CI 13%-45%, I2 = 50%) for endoscopic surgery and 50% (95% CI 22%-78%, I2 = 71%) for open surgery (p = 0.18). Intraoperative complications were similar: 17% (95% CI 7%-34%, I2 = 0%) for endoscopic vs 15% (95% CI 4%-42%, I2 = 76%) for open surgery (p = 0.85). Overall complication rates were 15% (95% CI 7%-31%, I2 = 45%) for endoscopic surgery and 20% (95% CI 9%-38%, I2 = 65%) for open surgery (p = 0.59). In the subgroup analysis of bicoronal synostosis, the reoperation rate was 10% (95% CI 4%-21%, I2 = 0%) for endoscopic surgery versus 16% (95% CI 7%-32%, I2 = 0%) for open surgery (p = 0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While both surgical approaches are reasonable options for nonsyndromic MSS, this meta-analysis suggests that endoscopic surgery could be associated with lower morbidity when compared with open surgery. Future studies with longer follow-up periods will be needed to validate these findings and contribute to the understanding of complex craniosynostosis management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"449-459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24364\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.PEDS24364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:非综合征性多缝合线缝骨闭锁(MSS)是一种罕见的颅缝骨闭锁。虽然内镜和开放手术入路对MSS患者都有疗效,但两种入路围手术期疗效的综合比较尚未得到充分探讨。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估两种手术入路之间的现有证据,以更好地为复杂颅缝闭锁的治疗提供信息。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Scopus从第一篇报道到2024年2月,报道内窥镜或开放手术治疗非综合征性MSS的手术结果的研究。主要终点是再手术率,次要终点包括输血率、术中并发症和总并发症,并对非综合征性双冠状关节闭锁患者进行亚组分析。结果:共分析了16项涉及310例患者的研究。接受开放手术的患者比接受内窥镜治疗的患者年龄大(平均年龄10.39 vs 3.21个月)。合并分析显示,内镜手术的再手术率为11% (95% CI 4%-23%, I2 = 25%),而开放手术的再手术率为22% (95% CI 14%-31%, I2 = 0) (p = 0.11)。内窥镜手术输血率为26% (95% CI 13%-45%, I2 = 50%),开放手术输血率为50% (95% CI 22%-78%, I2 = 71%) (p = 0.18)。术中并发症相似:内镜手术17% (95% CI 7%-34%, I2 = 0%),开放手术15% (95% CI 4%-42%, I2 = 76%) (p = 0.85)。内镜手术的总并发症发生率为15% (95% CI 7%-31%, I2 = 45%),开放手术的总并发症发生率为20% (95% CI 9%-38%, I2 = 65%) (p = 0.59)。在双冠状融合术的亚组分析中,内镜手术的再手术率为10% (95% CI 4%-21%, I2 = 0%),而开放手术的再手术率为16% (95% CI 7%-32%, I2 = 0%) (p = 0.39)。结论:虽然两种手术入路都是非综合征性MSS的合理选择,但该荟萃分析表明,与开放手术相比,内窥镜手术的发病率较低。未来需要更长随访期的研究来验证这些发现,并有助于理解复杂颅缝闭锁的治疗。
Comparative analysis of surgical approaches in nonsyndromic multiple-suture synostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: Nonsyndromic multiple-suture synostosis (MSS) is one of the rarest types of craniosynostosis. While both endoscopic and open surgical approaches have demonstrated efficacy for MSS patients, a comprehensive comparison of perioperative outcomes between the two approaches has yet to be fully explored. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the available evidence among the two surgical approaches to better inform the management of complex craniosynostosis.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published from the first reports through February 2024 that reported surgical outcomes of either endoscopic or open surgery for nonsyndromic MSS. The main outcome was the reoperation rate, with secondary endpoints including transfusion rates, intraoperative complications, and overall complications, with a subgroup analysis conducted for patients with nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis.
Results: Sixteen studies involving 310 patients were analyzed. Patients undergoing open surgery were older than those treated with endoscopy (mean age 10.39 vs 3.21 months). The pooled analysis showed a reoperation rate of 11% (95% CI 4%-23%, I2 = 25%) for endoscopic surgery compared with 22% (95% CI 14%-31%, I2 = 0) for open surgery (p = 0.11). Transfusion rates were 26% (95% CI 13%-45%, I2 = 50%) for endoscopic surgery and 50% (95% CI 22%-78%, I2 = 71%) for open surgery (p = 0.18). Intraoperative complications were similar: 17% (95% CI 7%-34%, I2 = 0%) for endoscopic vs 15% (95% CI 4%-42%, I2 = 76%) for open surgery (p = 0.85). Overall complication rates were 15% (95% CI 7%-31%, I2 = 45%) for endoscopic surgery and 20% (95% CI 9%-38%, I2 = 65%) for open surgery (p = 0.59). In the subgroup analysis of bicoronal synostosis, the reoperation rate was 10% (95% CI 4%-21%, I2 = 0%) for endoscopic surgery versus 16% (95% CI 7%-32%, I2 = 0%) for open surgery (p = 0.39).
Conclusions: While both surgical approaches are reasonable options for nonsyndromic MSS, this meta-analysis suggests that endoscopic surgery could be associated with lower morbidity when compared with open surgery. Future studies with longer follow-up periods will be needed to validate these findings and contribute to the understanding of complex craniosynostosis management.