两层问题。

IF 1.1 2区哲学 Q3 ETHICS

Journal of Moral Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1163/17455243-21050021

Dominic Jc Wilkinson

{"title":"两层问题。","authors":"Dominic Jc Wilkinson","doi":"10.1163/17455243-21050021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of philosophers argue for a Two-Tier View: that there is some difference between individual-affecting and non-individual-affecting choices. But it is challenging to know the degree of moral difference, and to determine for some cases into which category they fall. I refer to this as the \"Two Tier Problem.\" In this paper, I develop and defend a \"Two-Tier Deontic View.\" On that view, the higher tier applies to a subset of individual-affecting cases. We have stronger reason to bring about an individual-affecting rather than a non-individual-affecting benefit, but only in cases where we have agent-relative duties to the individuals so affected. In other cases (and I argue that this applies to most policy decisions affecting reproduction) there is no moral difference between individual- and non-individual-affecting choices.","PeriodicalId":51879,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7617454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Two-Tier Problem.\",\"authors\":\"Dominic Jc Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/17455243-21050021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of philosophers argue for a Two-Tier View: that there is some difference between individual-affecting and non-individual-affecting choices. But it is challenging to know the degree of moral difference, and to determine for some cases into which category they fall. I refer to this as the \\\"Two Tier Problem.\\\" In this paper, I develop and defend a \\\"Two-Tier Deontic View.\\\" On that view, the higher tier applies to a subset of individual-affecting cases. We have stronger reason to bring about an individual-affecting rather than a non-individual-affecting benefit, but only in cases where we have agent-relative duties to the individuals so affected. In other cases (and I argue that this applies to most policy decisions affecting reproduction) there is no moral difference between individual- and non-individual-affecting choices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Moral Philosophy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7617454/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Moral Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-21050021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-21050021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

许多哲学家支持两层观点：影响个人的选择和不影响个人的选择是有区别的。但要了解道德差异的程度，并在某些情况下确定它们属于哪一类，是一项挑战。我将此称为“两层问题”。在本文中，我发展并捍卫了“两层道义观”。根据这种观点，较高的层次适用于影响个人的案例的子集。我们有更强的理由带来影响个人的利益，而不是不影响个人的利益，但只有在我们对受影响的个人负有代理相关责任的情况下。在其他情况下（我认为这适用于大多数影响生殖的政策决定），在影响个人和不影响个人的选择之间没有道德上的区别。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Two-Tier Problem.

A number of philosophers argue for a Two-Tier View: that there is some difference between individual-affecting and non-individual-affecting choices. But it is challenging to know the degree of moral difference, and to determine for some cases into which category they fall. I refer to this as the "Two Tier Problem." In this paper, I develop and defend a "Two-Tier Deontic View." On that view, the higher tier applies to a subset of individual-affecting cases. We have stronger reason to bring about an individual-affecting rather than a non-individual-affecting benefit, but only in cases where we have agent-relative duties to the individuals so affected. In other cases (and I argue that this applies to most policy decisions affecting reproduction) there is no moral difference between individual- and non-individual-affecting choices.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Moral Philosophy Multiple-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Moral Philosophy is a peer-reviewed journal of moral, political and legal philosophy with an international focus. It publishes articles in all areas of normative philosophy, including pure and applied ethics, as well as moral, legal, and political theory. Articles exploring non-Western traditions are also welcome. The Journal seeks to promote lively discussions and debates for established academics and the wider community, by publishing articles that avoid unnecessary jargon without sacrificing academic rigour. It encourages contributions from newer members of the philosophical community. The Journal of Moral Philosophy is published four times a year, in January, April, July and October.