利用局部估计的散点图平滑(黄土)回归估计乳腺癌患者纵向队列中的缺失权值。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alexa Zimbalist, Kelly H. Radimer, Isaac J. Ergas, Janise M. Roh, Charles P. Quesenberry, Marilyn L. Kwan, Lawrence H. Kushi
{"title":"利用局部估计的散点图平滑(黄土)回归估计乳腺癌患者纵向队列中的缺失权值。","authors":"Alexa Zimbalist,&nbsp;Kelly H. Radimer,&nbsp;Isaac J. Ergas,&nbsp;Janise M. Roh,&nbsp;Charles P. Quesenberry,&nbsp;Marilyn L. Kwan,&nbsp;Lawrence H. Kushi","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Traditional methods to handle missing data rely on making assumptions about missing data patterns. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression models were explored as a data-driven option to minimize missing weight data in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Outpatient weights from 2 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis to 10 years post were extracted from electronic health records for 10,778 women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2005‐2013 at Kaiser Permanente. LOESS regression models estimated weights at baseline (breast cancer diagnosis) and 6 follow-up time points (6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 months post-baseline). The weights identified by the LOESS models were compared with those identified by the closest-available method, in which the weight measurement closest to each timepoint within a specified time window was selected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with the closest-available method, LOESS models identified fewer weights at baseline and 6 months post, but significantly more weights at later follow-up periods. At all timepoints, more than 80% of the weights identified by both approaches differed by 2.50 kilograms or less.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LOESS regression makes effective use of available longitudinal data and may be a beneficial tool to minimize missing longitudinal data in future EHR-based studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"104 ","pages":"Pages 55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression to estimate missing weights in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients\",\"authors\":\"Alexa Zimbalist,&nbsp;Kelly H. Radimer,&nbsp;Isaac J. Ergas,&nbsp;Janise M. Roh,&nbsp;Charles P. Quesenberry,&nbsp;Marilyn L. Kwan,&nbsp;Lawrence H. Kushi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.02.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Traditional methods to handle missing data rely on making assumptions about missing data patterns. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression models were explored as a data-driven option to minimize missing weight data in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Outpatient weights from 2 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis to 10 years post were extracted from electronic health records for 10,778 women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2005‐2013 at Kaiser Permanente. LOESS regression models estimated weights at baseline (breast cancer diagnosis) and 6 follow-up time points (6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 months post-baseline). The weights identified by the LOESS models were compared with those identified by the closest-available method, in which the weight measurement closest to each timepoint within a specified time window was selected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with the closest-available method, LOESS models identified fewer weights at baseline and 6 months post, but significantly more weights at later follow-up periods. At all timepoints, more than 80% of the weights identified by both approaches differed by 2.50 kilograms or less.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LOESS regression makes effective use of available longitudinal data and may be a beneficial tool to minimize missing longitudinal data in future EHR-based studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 55-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279725000390\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279725000390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

处理丢失数据的传统方法依赖于对丢失数据模式的假设。局部估计的散点图平滑(黄土)回归模型作为数据驱动的选择,以尽量减少乳腺癌患者纵向队列中缺失的体重数据。方法:从Kaiser Permanente 2005-2013年诊断为浸润性乳腺癌的10778名女性的电子健康记录中提取乳腺癌诊断前2年至10年后的门诊体重。黄土回归模型估计基线(乳腺癌诊断)和6个随访时间点(基线后6、12、24、48、72和96个月)的权重。将黄土模型确定的权重与最近可用法确定的权重进行比较,该方法在指定的时间窗内选择最接近每个时间点的权重测量值。结果:与最接近可用方法相比,黄土模型在基线和6个月后识别的权重较少,但在后续随访期间识别的权重显著增加。在所有时间点,两种方法确定的重量中,超过80%的重量相差不超过2.50公斤。结论:黄土回归有效地利用了现有的纵向数据,可能是未来基于电子病历的研究中减少纵向数据缺失的有益工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression to estimate missing weights in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients

Introduction

Traditional methods to handle missing data rely on making assumptions about missing data patterns. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression models were explored as a data-driven option to minimize missing weight data in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.

Methods

Outpatient weights from 2 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis to 10 years post were extracted from electronic health records for 10,778 women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2005‐2013 at Kaiser Permanente. LOESS regression models estimated weights at baseline (breast cancer diagnosis) and 6 follow-up time points (6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 months post-baseline). The weights identified by the LOESS models were compared with those identified by the closest-available method, in which the weight measurement closest to each timepoint within a specified time window was selected.

Results

Compared with the closest-available method, LOESS models identified fewer weights at baseline and 6 months post, but significantly more weights at later follow-up periods. At all timepoints, more than 80% of the weights identified by both approaches differed by 2.50 kilograms or less.

Conclusions

LOESS regression makes effective use of available longitudinal data and may be a beneficial tool to minimize missing longitudinal data in future EHR-based studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信