在临床环境中使用致幻剂的社会观点:对致幻剂量表(COPS)的关注和开放。

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1080/19585969.2025.2470426
Paweł Holas, Justyna Kamińska, Marcin Zajenkowski
{"title":"在临床环境中使用致幻剂的社会观点:对致幻剂量表(COPS)的关注和开放。","authors":"Paweł Holas, Justyna Kamińska, Marcin Zajenkowski","doi":"10.1080/19585969.2025.2470426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psychedelics are gaining recognition for their therapeutic potential in mental health treatment, yet societal attitudes remain divided, influenced by both skepticism and curiosity. This study aimed to develop and validate a scale assessing attitudes toward psychedelics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study 1 (n = 1000, convenience sample) explored the factor structure, identifying two dimensions: Openness toward Psychedelics and Concerns toward Psychedelics. Study 2 (n = 843, representative Polish sample) confirmed the scale's validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Concerns factor negatively correlated with meaning in life, while the Openness factor was positively associated with openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, mindfulness, meaning in life, and nature-relatedness. These associations suggest that individuals with greater openness and psychological flexibility may hold more favorable views on psychedelics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Concerns and Openness towards Psychedelics Scale (COPS) is a psychometrically sound tool for assessing attitudes toward psychedelics. Its meaningful correlations with established psychological constructs underscore its utility in research and public health. By providing insight into societal perceptions, COPS may help inform discussions on psychedelic therapy, policy, and education, ultimately fostering a more nuanced understanding of their potential benefits and risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":54343,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"27 1","pages":"11-21"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Societal perspectives on psychedelics use in clinical context: Development of Concerns and Openness towards Psychedelic Scale (COPS).\",\"authors\":\"Paweł Holas, Justyna Kamińska, Marcin Zajenkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19585969.2025.2470426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psychedelics are gaining recognition for their therapeutic potential in mental health treatment, yet societal attitudes remain divided, influenced by both skepticism and curiosity. This study aimed to develop and validate a scale assessing attitudes toward psychedelics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study 1 (n = 1000, convenience sample) explored the factor structure, identifying two dimensions: Openness toward Psychedelics and Concerns toward Psychedelics. Study 2 (n = 843, representative Polish sample) confirmed the scale's validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Concerns factor negatively correlated with meaning in life, while the Openness factor was positively associated with openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, mindfulness, meaning in life, and nature-relatedness. These associations suggest that individuals with greater openness and psychological flexibility may hold more favorable views on psychedelics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Concerns and Openness towards Psychedelics Scale (COPS) is a psychometrically sound tool for assessing attitudes toward psychedelics. Its meaningful correlations with established psychological constructs underscore its utility in research and public health. By providing insight into societal perceptions, COPS may help inform discussions on psychedelic therapy, policy, and education, ultimately fostering a more nuanced understanding of their potential benefits and risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"11-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892042/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19585969.2025.2470426\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19585969.2025.2470426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:致幻剂因其在心理健康治疗中的治疗潜力而获得认可,然而,受怀疑和好奇的影响,社会态度仍然存在分歧。本研究旨在开发并验证一种评估对致幻剂态度的量表。方法:研究1 (n = 1000,方便样本)探讨了因素结构,确定了两个维度:对致幻剂的开放和对致幻剂的关注。研究2 (n = 843,波兰代表性样本)证实了量表的有效性。结果:“关心”因子与生活意义呈负相关,“开放”因子与经验开放性、宜人性、尽责性、正念性、生活意义和自然亲缘性呈正相关。这些关联表明,具有更大开放性和心理灵活性的个体可能对迷幻药持有更有利的看法。讨论:对迷幻药的关注和开放程度量表(COPS)是一种心理测量学上可靠的工具,用于评估对迷幻药的态度。它与已建立的心理结构有意义的相关性强调了它在研究和公共卫生中的效用。通过提供对社会观念的洞察,cop可能有助于为关于迷幻药治疗、政策和教育的讨论提供信息,最终促进对其潜在益处和风险的更细致的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Societal perspectives on psychedelics use in clinical context: Development of Concerns and Openness towards Psychedelic Scale (COPS).

Introduction: Psychedelics are gaining recognition for their therapeutic potential in mental health treatment, yet societal attitudes remain divided, influenced by both skepticism and curiosity. This study aimed to develop and validate a scale assessing attitudes toward psychedelics.

Methods: Study 1 (n = 1000, convenience sample) explored the factor structure, identifying two dimensions: Openness toward Psychedelics and Concerns toward Psychedelics. Study 2 (n = 843, representative Polish sample) confirmed the scale's validity.

Results: The Concerns factor negatively correlated with meaning in life, while the Openness factor was positively associated with openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, mindfulness, meaning in life, and nature-relatedness. These associations suggest that individuals with greater openness and psychological flexibility may hold more favorable views on psychedelics.

Discussion: The Concerns and Openness towards Psychedelics Scale (COPS) is a psychometrically sound tool for assessing attitudes toward psychedelics. Its meaningful correlations with established psychological constructs underscore its utility in research and public health. By providing insight into societal perceptions, COPS may help inform discussions on psychedelic therapy, policy, and education, ultimately fostering a more nuanced understanding of their potential benefits and risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.20%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (DCNS) endeavors to bridge the gap between clinical neuropsychiatry and the neurosciences by offering state-of-the-art information and original insights into pertinent clinical, biological, and therapeutic aspects. As an open access journal, DCNS ensures accessibility to its content for all interested parties. Each issue is curated to include expert reviews, original articles, and brief reports, carefully selected to offer a comprehensive understanding of the evolving landscape in clinical neuroscience. Join us in advancing knowledge and fostering dialogue in this dynamic field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信