氨甲环酸在外伤性脑损伤治疗中的应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2025RW0753
Thiago Gebrin, Júlia Pinho Neodini, André Felix Gentil, Eduardo Carvalhal Ribas, Mario Lenza, Arthur Werner Poetscher
{"title":"氨甲环酸在外伤性脑损伤治疗中的应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Thiago Gebrin, Júlia Pinho Neodini, André Felix Gentil, Eduardo Carvalhal Ribas, Mario Lenza, Arthur Werner Poetscher","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2025RW0753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability. Tranexamic acid, an antifibrinolytic agent, holds the potential for managing intracranial hemorrhages secondary to traumatic brain injury. However, its efficacy and safety remain subjects of ongoing debate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better clarify the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in that context and to evaluate the need for further studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of seven electronic databases, eight study repositories, and tertiary sources between January 2021 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials involving victims of traumatic brain injury aged 15 or older who received tranexamic acid versus placebo or standard care. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and hemorrhagic complications during treatment. This review incorporated elements of PRISMA guidelines, Cochrane's Risk of Bias assessment, and GRADE to assess evidence quality. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 6,958 references retrieved, 14 of the 17 randomized controlled trials were analyzed, encompassing a total of 15,017 patients. Analyses for all-cause mortality did not reach statistical significance (RR= 0.95, 95%CI= 0.88-1.02 | trial sequential analysis RR= 0.95, 95%CI= 0.87-1.03). However, the analysis of hemorrhagic complications during treatment showed statistical significance for progressive intracranial hemorrhage (RR= 0.82, 95%CI= 0.68-0.99 | trial sequential analysis RR= 0.82, 95%CI= 0.38-1.78). Analyses of secondary outcomes, namely unfavorable neurological outcome and other adverse effects, did not demonstrate statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tranexamic acid use did not demonstrate efficacy based on all-cause mortality but showed a favorable safety profile. Additional clinical trials may shed light on remaining clinical uncertainties. Prospero database registration: CRD42021221949.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"23 ","pages":"eRW0753"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tranexamic acid in the management of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Thiago Gebrin, Júlia Pinho Neodini, André Felix Gentil, Eduardo Carvalhal Ribas, Mario Lenza, Arthur Werner Poetscher\",\"doi\":\"10.31744/einstein_journal/2025RW0753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability. Tranexamic acid, an antifibrinolytic agent, holds the potential for managing intracranial hemorrhages secondary to traumatic brain injury. However, its efficacy and safety remain subjects of ongoing debate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better clarify the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in that context and to evaluate the need for further studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of seven electronic databases, eight study repositories, and tertiary sources between January 2021 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials involving victims of traumatic brain injury aged 15 or older who received tranexamic acid versus placebo or standard care. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and hemorrhagic complications during treatment. This review incorporated elements of PRISMA guidelines, Cochrane's Risk of Bias assessment, and GRADE to assess evidence quality. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 6,958 references retrieved, 14 of the 17 randomized controlled trials were analyzed, encompassing a total of 15,017 patients. Analyses for all-cause mortality did not reach statistical significance (RR= 0.95, 95%CI= 0.88-1.02 | trial sequential analysis RR= 0.95, 95%CI= 0.87-1.03). However, the analysis of hemorrhagic complications during treatment showed statistical significance for progressive intracranial hemorrhage (RR= 0.82, 95%CI= 0.68-0.99 | trial sequential analysis RR= 0.82, 95%CI= 0.38-1.78). Analyses of secondary outcomes, namely unfavorable neurological outcome and other adverse effects, did not demonstrate statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tranexamic acid use did not demonstrate efficacy based on all-cause mortality but showed a favorable safety profile. Additional clinical trials may shed light on remaining clinical uncertainties. Prospero database registration: CRD42021221949.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Einstein-Sao Paulo\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"eRW0753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869795/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Einstein-Sao Paulo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2025RW0753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2025RW0753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外伤性脑损伤是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。氨甲环酸是一种抗纤溶剂,具有治疗外伤性脑损伤继发性颅内出血的潜力。然而,它的有效性和安全性仍然是争论的主题。目的:更好地阐明氨甲环酸在这种情况下的疗效和安全性,并评估进一步研究的必要性。方法:我们在2021年1月至2022年1月期间对7个电子数据库、8个研究库和第三来源进行了全面检索,涉及15岁或以上接受氨甲环酸与安慰剂或标准治疗的创伤性脑损伤受害者的随机对照试验。主要结局是治疗期间的全因死亡率和出血性并发症。本综述纳入了PRISMA指南、Cochrane偏倚风险评估和GRADE评估证据质量的要素。还进行了敏感性分析。结果:在检索到的6958篇文献中,17项随机对照试验中有14项被分析,共涉及15017例患者。全因死亡率分析无统计学意义(RR= 0.95, 95%CI= 0.88-1.02),试验序贯分析RR= 0.95, 95%CI= 0.87-1.03)。但治疗过程中出血并发症分析显示,进展性颅内出血有统计学意义(RR= 0.82, 95%CI= 0.68 ~ 0.99)。次要结局的分析,即不良的神经转归和其他不良反应,没有显示出统计学意义。结论:氨甲环酸的使用并没有显示出基于全因死亡率的有效性,但显示出良好的安全性。更多的临床试验可能会揭示剩余的临床不确定性。普洛斯彼罗数据库注册:CRD42021221949。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tranexamic acid in the management of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability. Tranexamic acid, an antifibrinolytic agent, holds the potential for managing intracranial hemorrhages secondary to traumatic brain injury. However, its efficacy and safety remain subjects of ongoing debate.

Objective: To better clarify the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in that context and to evaluate the need for further studies.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of seven electronic databases, eight study repositories, and tertiary sources between January 2021 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials involving victims of traumatic brain injury aged 15 or older who received tranexamic acid versus placebo or standard care. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and hemorrhagic complications during treatment. This review incorporated elements of PRISMA guidelines, Cochrane's Risk of Bias assessment, and GRADE to assess evidence quality. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

Results: Out of 6,958 references retrieved, 14 of the 17 randomized controlled trials were analyzed, encompassing a total of 15,017 patients. Analyses for all-cause mortality did not reach statistical significance (RR= 0.95, 95%CI= 0.88-1.02 | trial sequential analysis RR= 0.95, 95%CI= 0.87-1.03). However, the analysis of hemorrhagic complications during treatment showed statistical significance for progressive intracranial hemorrhage (RR= 0.82, 95%CI= 0.68-0.99 | trial sequential analysis RR= 0.82, 95%CI= 0.38-1.78). Analyses of secondary outcomes, namely unfavorable neurological outcome and other adverse effects, did not demonstrate statistical significance.

Conclusion: Tranexamic acid use did not demonstrate efficacy based on all-cause mortality but showed a favorable safety profile. Additional clinical trials may shed light on remaining clinical uncertainties. Prospero database registration: CRD42021221949.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信