IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-18 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_48_24
T P Pradhyumna Koushik, Vivek Meyyappan, Nakul Baban Aher, Hariharasudhan Sekar, Gayathri Thiruvengadam, Sriram Krishnamoorthy
{"title":"Miniperc percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of juxta uretero-pelvic junction upper ureteric calculi: A prospective, randomized control study.","authors":"T P Pradhyumna Koushik, Vivek Meyyappan, Nakul Baban Aher, Hariharasudhan Sekar, Gayathri Thiruvengadam, Sriram Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_48_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treatment of upper ureteric calculi has always remained a challenge for urologists. Treating the juxta-UPJ stones has been even more challenging. Difficulties in access, the possibility of up migration of stones, higher chances of leaving behind residual fragments, and the need for ancillary procedures like ESWL or relook URS have been a few inherent limitations in treating such stones. Offering PCNL for smaller stones was considered an overkill by many urologists. However, with the advent of miniaturized PCNL and improvisations in RIRS techniques, more and more of such stones are tackled with ease.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Miniperc PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of juxta pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) calculi, located between 1 and 2 cm from PUJ.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized study was done on 100 patients with upper ureteric stones up to 2 cm in size and within 2 cm from PUJ. Patients with odd numbers were assigned Group A (Miniperc PCNL, <i>n</i> = 50) and even numbers were assigned to Group B (RIRS, <i>n</i> = 50).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stone-free rates were 92% for Group A and 72% for Group B (<i>P</i> < 0.0174). Mean operative time was significantly shorter in Group A than Group B (53.2 min vs. 68.52 min, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hospital stay was longer for Group A (47.42 h) compared to Group B (29.36 h, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Lasing time was more with RIRS than with PCNL (10.18 min vs. 3.24 min, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The complications were more in Group A than Group B, but not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.160). Postoperative pain and time to return to normal activities were significantly better in Group B RIRS (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both Miniperc PCNL and RIRS are the effective treatments for upper ureteric stones. Miniperc PCNL has advantages in terms of shorter operative time, lesser lasing time, and better stone free rates. RIRS demonstrated reduced hospital stay, reduced postoperative pain, and quicker recovery. Miniperc PCNL showed a higher stone-free rate for treating upper ureteric stones up to 2 cm. RIRS is effective for treating stones up to 2 cm in upper ureter reducing the complications associated with Miniperc PCNL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_48_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:输尿管上段结石的治疗一直是泌尿科医生面临的难题。而治疗输尿管下段结石则更具挑战性。入路困难、结石可能上移、留下残余碎片的几率较高,以及需要 ESWL 或 relook URS 等辅助手术,这些都是治疗此类结石的一些固有限制。许多泌尿科医生认为,为较小的结石提供 PCNL 是矫枉过正的做法。然而,随着微型 PCNL 的出现和 RIRS 技术的改进,越来越多的此类结石被轻松解决:比较微型经皮肾镜取石术(Miniperc PCNL)和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗距肾盂输尿管交界处(PUJ)1-2 厘米的结石的安全性和有效性:对 100 名输尿管上段结石患者进行了前瞻性随机研究,结石大小不超过 2 厘米,距离 PUJ 2 厘米以内。奇数患者被分配到 A 组(Miniperc PCNL,n = 50),偶数患者被分配到 B 组(RIRS,n = 50):结果:A组无结石率为92%,B组为72%(P < 0.0174)。A 组的平均手术时间明显短于 B 组(53.2 分钟对 68.52 分钟,P < 0.001)。A 组的住院时间(47.42 小时)长于 B 组(29.36 小时,P < 0.001)。与 PCNL 相比,RIRS 的激光时间更长(10.18 分钟对 3.24 分钟,P < 0.001)。A 组的并发症多于 B 组,但并不显著(P = 0.160)。B 组 RIRS 的术后疼痛和恢复正常活动的时间明显更好(P < 0.001):结论:Miniperc PCNL 和 RIRS 都是治疗输尿管上段结石的有效方法。Miniperc PCNL 在缩短手术时间、减少激光时间和提高无石率方面具有优势。RIRS 缩短了住院时间,减轻了术后疼痛,而且恢复更快。Miniperc PCNL 治疗 2 厘米以下的输尿管上段结石的无结石率更高。RIRS 可有效治疗 2 厘米以下的输尿管上段结石,减少了 Miniperc PCNL 带来的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Miniperc percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of juxta uretero-pelvic junction upper ureteric calculi: A prospective, randomized control study.

Introduction: Treatment of upper ureteric calculi has always remained a challenge for urologists. Treating the juxta-UPJ stones has been even more challenging. Difficulties in access, the possibility of up migration of stones, higher chances of leaving behind residual fragments, and the need for ancillary procedures like ESWL or relook URS have been a few inherent limitations in treating such stones. Offering PCNL for smaller stones was considered an overkill by many urologists. However, with the advent of miniaturized PCNL and improvisations in RIRS techniques, more and more of such stones are tackled with ease.

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Miniperc PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of juxta pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) calculi, located between 1 and 2 cm from PUJ.

Materials and methods: A prospective, randomized study was done on 100 patients with upper ureteric stones up to 2 cm in size and within 2 cm from PUJ. Patients with odd numbers were assigned Group A (Miniperc PCNL, n = 50) and even numbers were assigned to Group B (RIRS, n = 50).

Results: Stone-free rates were 92% for Group A and 72% for Group B (P < 0.0174). Mean operative time was significantly shorter in Group A than Group B (53.2 min vs. 68.52 min, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was longer for Group A (47.42 h) compared to Group B (29.36 h, P < 0.001). Lasing time was more with RIRS than with PCNL (10.18 min vs. 3.24 min, P < 0.001). The complications were more in Group A than Group B, but not significant (P = 0.160). Postoperative pain and time to return to normal activities were significantly better in Group B RIRS (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Both Miniperc PCNL and RIRS are the effective treatments for upper ureteric stones. Miniperc PCNL has advantages in terms of shorter operative time, lesser lasing time, and better stone free rates. RIRS demonstrated reduced hospital stay, reduced postoperative pain, and quicker recovery. Miniperc PCNL showed a higher stone-free rate for treating upper ureteric stones up to 2 cm. RIRS is effective for treating stones up to 2 cm in upper ureter reducing the complications associated with Miniperc PCNL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信