[论心理保健对人口心理健康的未来意义]。

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2025-01-01
P Bracke
{"title":"[论心理保健对人口心理健康的未来意义]。","authors":"P Bracke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opinions differ on the societal importance of mental health care (GGZ) and the direction it should take. Is there a need for prevention targeting high-risk health groups, should more attention be paid to precision psychiatry, or is the focus better placed on promoting a mentally healthy lifestyle or accessible care in disadvantaged neighborhoods?</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To outline the social importance of mental health care from three perspectives: the biomedical-clinical approach, the moral-philosophical, social-critical perspective and an approach that emphasizes social inequality and disadvantage. Further I reflect on the possible importance of some innovations in mental health care for future general mental health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Literature review and consideration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questions about the social importance of mental health care and the future direction of mental health care are typically viewed from a biomedical and clinical perspective, with the assumption that what benefits patients is also the most direct path to improved public mental health. However, other narratives also dominate the discussion, such as socio-critical approaches or perspectives emphasizing social inequality and marginalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anyone who examines these approaches from a public health perspective must conclude that many innovations in mental health care are largely irrelevant to public mental health, despite their impact on the relationship between society and mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 2","pages":"124-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[On the future relevance of mental health care for population mental health].\",\"authors\":\"P Bracke\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opinions differ on the societal importance of mental health care (GGZ) and the direction it should take. Is there a need for prevention targeting high-risk health groups, should more attention be paid to precision psychiatry, or is the focus better placed on promoting a mentally healthy lifestyle or accessible care in disadvantaged neighborhoods?</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To outline the social importance of mental health care from three perspectives: the biomedical-clinical approach, the moral-philosophical, social-critical perspective and an approach that emphasizes social inequality and disadvantage. Further I reflect on the possible importance of some innovations in mental health care for future general mental health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Literature review and consideration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questions about the social importance of mental health care and the future direction of mental health care are typically viewed from a biomedical and clinical perspective, with the assumption that what benefits patients is also the most direct path to improved public mental health. However, other narratives also dominate the discussion, such as socio-critical approaches or perspectives emphasizing social inequality and marginalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anyone who examines these approaches from a public health perspective must conclude that many innovations in mental health care are largely irrelevant to public mental health, despite their impact on the relationship between society and mental health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"124-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于精神卫生保健(GGZ)的社会重要性及其应采取的方向,意见不一。是否有必要针对高危健康群体进行预防,是否应该更多地关注精准精神病学,还是应该更好地将重点放在促进心理健康的生活方式或在弱势社区提供护理上?目的:从生物医学-临床角度、道德-哲学角度、社会批判角度和强调社会不平等和劣势的角度概述精神卫生保健的社会重要性。此外,我还思考了精神卫生保健方面的一些创新对未来一般精神卫生的可能重要性。方法:查阅文献并加以参考。结果:关于精神卫生保健的社会重要性和精神卫生保健的未来方向的问题通常是从生物医学和临床的角度来看待的,并假设使患者受益也是改善公众精神卫生的最直接途径。然而,其他叙述也主导了讨论,例如强调社会不平等和边缘化的社会批判方法或观点。结论:任何从公共卫生角度审视这些方法的人都必须得出这样的结论:尽管精神卫生保健方面的许多创新对社会与精神卫生保健之间的关系产生了影响,但它们在很大程度上与公众精神卫生无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[On the future relevance of mental health care for population mental health].

Background: Opinions differ on the societal importance of mental health care (GGZ) and the direction it should take. Is there a need for prevention targeting high-risk health groups, should more attention be paid to precision psychiatry, or is the focus better placed on promoting a mentally healthy lifestyle or accessible care in disadvantaged neighborhoods?

Aim: To outline the social importance of mental health care from three perspectives: the biomedical-clinical approach, the moral-philosophical, social-critical perspective and an approach that emphasizes social inequality and disadvantage. Further I reflect on the possible importance of some innovations in mental health care for future general mental health.

Method: Literature review and consideration.

Results: Questions about the social importance of mental health care and the future direction of mental health care are typically viewed from a biomedical and clinical perspective, with the assumption that what benefits patients is also the most direct path to improved public mental health. However, other narratives also dominate the discussion, such as socio-critical approaches or perspectives emphasizing social inequality and marginalization.

Conclusion: Anyone who examines these approaches from a public health perspective must conclude that many innovations in mental health care are largely irrelevant to public mental health, despite their impact on the relationship between society and mental health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信