IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-03-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0315709
Celine Bafort, Sharon Lie Fong, Steffen Fieuws, Brecht Geysenbergh, Michelle Nisolle, Jean-Luc Squifflet, Linda Tebache, Christine Wyns, Christel Meuleman, Carla Tomassetti
{"title":"Conservative endometrioma surgery: The combined technique versus CO2-laser vaporization only (BLAST: Belgium LAser STudy): Clinical protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Celine Bafort, Sharon Lie Fong, Steffen Fieuws, Brecht Geysenbergh, Michelle Nisolle, Jean-Luc Squifflet, Linda Tebache, Christine Wyns, Christel Meuleman, Carla Tomassetti","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0315709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical management of endometrioma(s) remains challenging. Although laparoscopic surgery is a well-established treatment of endometrioma(s), caution is required to minimize ovarian damage. Several surgical techniques have been described to treat endometrioma(s): classical cystectomy, ablative techniques, or a combination of both. As cystectomy is strongly associated with a reduction in ovarian reserve, this randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to determine to what extent the two other surgical procedures may affect ovarian reserve by comparing changes in serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels concentrations after each type of surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicenter, non-blinded, RCT with parallel groups (group 1 (combined technique) versus group 2 (CO2 laser vaporization only)) and allocation 1:1. Four Belgian centers will be involved. Main inclusion criteria are symptomatic patients (pain and/or infertility), 18-40 years (both inclusive) with an endometriotic cyst (mean diameter of ≥ 2.5 cm and ≤ 8 cm) and AMH level ≥ 0.7 ng/mL. Suspicion of malignancy, a contralateral endometrioma of > 2 cm, use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues around timing of surgery or previous oophorectomy are exclusion criteria. The primary aim is the evaluation of the difference in serum AMH levels between baseline and 3 months postoperatively (or delta AMH). The secondary outcomes include differences in AMH levels at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, cyst recurrence rate, evolution of pain pattern and fertility outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present study will help us to answer the question on which surgical technique for endometrioma(s) has the most favorable outcome in patients wishing to preserve their reproductive potential.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04151433. Registered on November 5th, 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 3","pages":"e0315709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:子宫内膜异位症的手术治疗仍然具有挑战性。虽然腹腔镜手术是治疗子宫内膜异位症的一种行之有效的方法,但仍需谨慎,以尽量减少对卵巢的损伤。目前已有多种治疗子宫内膜异位症的手术方法:传统的膀胱切除术、烧蚀技术或两者的结合。由于囊肿切除术与卵巢储备功能下降密切相关,本随机对照试验(RCT)旨在通过比较每种手术后血清抗缪勒氏管激素(AMH)水平浓度的变化,确定其他两种手术方法对卵巢储备功能的影响程度:这是一项多中心、非盲性、RCT,平行分组(第 1 组(联合技术)与第 2 组(仅 CO2 激光汽化)),分配比例为 1:1。四个比利时中心将参与其中。主要纳入标准是有症状的患者(疼痛和/或不孕),年龄在 18-40 岁(包括 40 岁),有子宫内膜异位囊肿(平均直径≥ 2.5 厘米和≤ 8 厘米),AMH 水平≥ 0.7 纳克/毫升。疑似恶性肿瘤、对侧子宫内膜瘤大于 2 厘米、在手术时间前后使用促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)类似物或曾进行过输卵管切除术均为排除标准。主要目的是评估基线与术后 3 个月之间血清 AMH 水平的差异(或 AMH δ)。次要结果包括术后 6 个月和 12 个月 AMH 水平的差异、囊肿复发率、疼痛模式的演变以及生育结果:讨论:本研究将帮助我们回答这样一个问题:对于希望保留生殖潜能的患者来说,哪种子宫内膜异位症手术技术的效果最好?试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04151433。注册日期:2019年11月5日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conservative endometrioma surgery: The combined technique versus CO2-laser vaporization only (BLAST: Belgium LAser STudy): Clinical protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Background: The surgical management of endometrioma(s) remains challenging. Although laparoscopic surgery is a well-established treatment of endometrioma(s), caution is required to minimize ovarian damage. Several surgical techniques have been described to treat endometrioma(s): classical cystectomy, ablative techniques, or a combination of both. As cystectomy is strongly associated with a reduction in ovarian reserve, this randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to determine to what extent the two other surgical procedures may affect ovarian reserve by comparing changes in serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels concentrations after each type of surgery.

Methods: This is a multicenter, non-blinded, RCT with parallel groups (group 1 (combined technique) versus group 2 (CO2 laser vaporization only)) and allocation 1:1. Four Belgian centers will be involved. Main inclusion criteria are symptomatic patients (pain and/or infertility), 18-40 years (both inclusive) with an endometriotic cyst (mean diameter of ≥ 2.5 cm and ≤ 8 cm) and AMH level ≥ 0.7 ng/mL. Suspicion of malignancy, a contralateral endometrioma of > 2 cm, use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues around timing of surgery or previous oophorectomy are exclusion criteria. The primary aim is the evaluation of the difference in serum AMH levels between baseline and 3 months postoperatively (or delta AMH). The secondary outcomes include differences in AMH levels at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, cyst recurrence rate, evolution of pain pattern and fertility outcomes.

Discussion: The present study will help us to answer the question on which surgical technique for endometrioma(s) has the most favorable outcome in patients wishing to preserve their reproductive potential.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04151433. Registered on November 5th, 2019.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信