IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S502453
Giuliano Lo Bianco, Marinella Pugliesi, Giovanni Misseri, Sean Li, Miles Day, Michael E Schatman, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, R Jason Yong, Christopher L Robinson
{"title":"Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Joint Pain Using a V-Shaped Active Tip Needle: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Giuliano Lo Bianco, Marinella Pugliesi, Giovanni Misseri, Sean Li, Miles Day, Michael E Schatman, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, R Jason Yong, Christopher L Robinson","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S502453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic knee pain from osteoarthritis (OA) affects a significant proportion of adults over 40. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the standard for advanced OA, yet up to 20% of patients experience chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) can alleviate pain in those unresponsive to conservative treatments or TKA. However, anatomical variability of the genicular nerves may limit treatment durability. This retrospective, single-center observational study investigated whether using a novel V-shaped active tip needle-which creates larger lesions-could improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients with symptomatic knee OA or CPSP, who had a ≥50% reduction in pain after diagnostic genicular nerve blocks, underwent GNRFA with a V-shaped active tip needle between September 2020 and January 2022. Pain and function were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and during movement, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4), and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 9 months post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By 6 months, 64% of patients showed ≥50% reduction in VAS pain scores, sustained at 9 months (p<0.0001). Median WOMAC scores improved from 62.0 at baseline to 40.0 at 6 months (p<0.0001). DN4 scores declined from a median of 4.0 at baseline to 2.0 at 6 months and 1.0 at 9 months (p<0.001). EQ-5D scores demonstrated significant enhancement in quality of life (p<0.01). Pain intensity differences at rest and during movement remained substantially improved at 9 months (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GNRFA using a V-shaped active tip needle is a promising intervention for chronic knee pain, offering significant and sustained pain relief and functional improvement. Larger lesions created by the novel needle may overcome anatomical challenges, though further randomized studies are warranted to validate efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1045-1055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S502453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨关节炎(OA)引起的慢性膝关节疼痛影响着很大一部分 40 岁以上的成年人。全膝关节置换术(TKA)仍是治疗晚期 OA 的标准方法,但多达 20% 的患者会出现术后慢性疼痛(CPSP)。膝神经射频消融术(GNRFA)可减轻那些对保守治疗或 TKA 无反应的患者的疼痛。然而,膝状神经解剖结构的多变性可能会限制治疗的持久性。这项回顾性、单中心观察性研究探讨了使用新型 V 形主动针头是否能改善疗效,这种针头能产生更大的病灶:50名有症状的膝关节OA或CPSP患者在诊断性膝神经阻滞后疼痛减轻≥50%,在2020年9月至2022年1月期间使用V形主动针头接受了GNRFA。在基线和术后1、3、6、9个月时,使用静态和运动时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)、Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions(DN4)和EuroQol-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D)对疼痛和功能进行评估:结果:到 6 个月时,64% 的患者的 VAS 疼痛评分降低了 50%,并在 9 个月时保持不变(pConclusion):使用 V 型主动针头的 GNRFA 是一种治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的有效方法,可显著、持续地缓解疼痛并改善功能。这种新型针头造成的更大病变可能会克服解剖学上的挑战,但仍需进一步的随机研究来验证其疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Joint Pain Using a V-Shaped Active Tip Needle: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.

Background: Chronic knee pain from osteoarthritis (OA) affects a significant proportion of adults over 40. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the standard for advanced OA, yet up to 20% of patients experience chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) can alleviate pain in those unresponsive to conservative treatments or TKA. However, anatomical variability of the genicular nerves may limit treatment durability. This retrospective, single-center observational study investigated whether using a novel V-shaped active tip needle-which creates larger lesions-could improve outcomes.

Methods: Fifty patients with symptomatic knee OA or CPSP, who had a ≥50% reduction in pain after diagnostic genicular nerve blocks, underwent GNRFA with a V-shaped active tip needle between September 2020 and January 2022. Pain and function were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and during movement, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4), and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 9 months post-procedure.

Results: By 6 months, 64% of patients showed ≥50% reduction in VAS pain scores, sustained at 9 months (p<0.0001). Median WOMAC scores improved from 62.0 at baseline to 40.0 at 6 months (p<0.0001). DN4 scores declined from a median of 4.0 at baseline to 2.0 at 6 months and 1.0 at 9 months (p<0.001). EQ-5D scores demonstrated significant enhancement in quality of life (p<0.01). Pain intensity differences at rest and during movement remained substantially improved at 9 months (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: GNRFA using a V-shaped active tip needle is a promising intervention for chronic knee pain, offering significant and sustained pain relief and functional improvement. Larger lesions created by the novel needle may overcome anatomical challenges, though further randomized studies are warranted to validate efficacy and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信