评估youtube上有关高血压信息的质量和可靠性：一项综合分析。

IF 2.7 4区医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE

Journal of Human Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1038/s41371-025-00999-6

Geethiikha Jammula, Juhi Ardeshna-Chovatiya, Nadia Djahanshahi, Marina Samuel Basta, Krishna Amarlal Katariya, Iorwuese Ali Daniel, Saumya Joshi

{"title":"评估youtube上有关高血压信息的质量和可靠性：一项综合分析。","authors":"Geethiikha Jammula, Juhi Ardeshna-Chovatiya, Nadia Djahanshahi, Marina Samuel Basta, Krishna Amarlal Katariya, Iorwuese Ali Daniel, Saumya Joshi","doi":"10.1038/s41371-025-00999-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient education is an important aspect in the management of hypertension and YouTube has become a popular platform for sharing hypertension-related information, but concerns persist regarding the accuracy and reliability of such content in the context of patient education. To address this issue, this cross-sectional type of observational study aims to assess YouTube’s information on hypertension using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Reliability Score (DISCERN SCORE), which evaluate the quality and trustworthiness of the YouTube content, and the Video Power Index (VPI). Majority of the videos are uploaded by physicians (26, 33.3 percent) and most give information about causes/etiology, treatment, complications (n = 51, 65.38%) each. The median GQS for all the videos is 4. The median reliability score is 4. The statistical test used is Kruskal - Wallis Test. The p value of VPI, GQS, and Reliability score among various types of uploader are 0.264, 0.347 and 0.452. Hence, there is no statistical significance (p value > 0.05). The analysis therefore suggests that the quality of these videos is moderate. Although they usually provide accurate information, they lack comprehensiveness and may have a biased perspective.","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":"39 4","pages":"308-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the quality and reliability of youtube information on hypertension: a comprehensive analysis\",\"authors\":\"Geethiikha Jammula, Juhi Ardeshna-Chovatiya, Nadia Djahanshahi, Marina Samuel Basta, Krishna Amarlal Katariya, Iorwuese Ali Daniel, Saumya Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41371-025-00999-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patient education is an important aspect in the management of hypertension and YouTube has become a popular platform for sharing hypertension-related information, but concerns persist regarding the accuracy and reliability of such content in the context of patient education. To address this issue, this cross-sectional type of observational study aims to assess YouTube’s information on hypertension using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Reliability Score (DISCERN SCORE), which evaluate the quality and trustworthiness of the YouTube content, and the Video Power Index (VPI). Majority of the videos are uploaded by physicians (26, 33.3 percent) and most give information about causes/etiology, treatment, complications (n = 51, 65.38%) each. The median GQS for all the videos is 4. The median reliability score is 4. The statistical test used is Kruskal - Wallis Test. The p value of VPI, GQS, and Reliability score among various types of uploader are 0.264, 0.347 and 0.452. Hence, there is no statistical significance (p value > 0.05). The analysis therefore suggests that the quality of these videos is moderate. Although they usually provide accurate information, they lack comprehensiveness and may have a biased perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"308-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-025-00999-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-025-00999-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

患者教育是高血压管理的一个重要方面，YouTube已成为分享高血压相关信息的热门平台，但在患者教育背景下，这些内容的准确性和可靠性仍然令人担忧。为了解决这一问题，本横断面类型的观察性研究旨在使用评估YouTube内容质量和可信度的全球质量评分（GQS）和可靠性评分（DISCERN Score）以及视频力量指数（VPI）来评估YouTube关于高血压的信息。大多数视频是由医生上传的（26.33.3%），大多数视频都提供了病因/病因、治疗、并发症的信息（n = 51, 65.38%）。所有视频的GQS中值都是4。信度得分中位数为4。使用的统计检验是Kruskal - Wallis检验。各类上传者VPI、GQS、可靠性评分的p值分别为0.264、0.347、0.452。因此，无统计学意义（p值> 0.05）。因此分析表明，这些视频的质量是中等的。虽然他们通常提供准确的信息，但他们缺乏全面性，可能有偏见的观点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the quality and reliability of youtube information on hypertension: a comprehensive analysis

查看原文本刊更多论文

Assessing the quality and reliability of youtube information on hypertension: a comprehensive analysis

Patient education is an important aspect in the management of hypertension and YouTube has become a popular platform for sharing hypertension-related information, but concerns persist regarding the accuracy and reliability of such content in the context of patient education. To address this issue, this cross-sectional type of observational study aims to assess YouTube’s information on hypertension using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Reliability Score (DISCERN SCORE), which evaluate the quality and trustworthiness of the YouTube content, and the Video Power Index (VPI). Majority of the videos are uploaded by physicians (26, 33.3 percent) and most give information about causes/etiology, treatment, complications (n = 51, 65.38%) each. The median GQS for all the videos is 4. The median reliability score is 4. The statistical test used is Kruskal - Wallis Test. The p value of VPI, GQS, and Reliability score among various types of uploader are 0.264, 0.347 and 0.452. Hence, there is no statistical significance (p value > 0.05). The analysis therefore suggests that the quality of these videos is moderate. Although they usually provide accurate information, they lack comprehensiveness and may have a biased perspective.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Human Hypertension 医学-外周血管病

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

3.70%

发文量

126

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension. The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.