在急性体外试验中,不同表面修饰策略对凝血酶生成的影响。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Guillaume Charbonnier, Nicole M Cancelliere, Alice B Brochu, Allison M Marley, Vitor M Pereira
{"title":"在急性体外试验中,不同表面修饰策略对凝血酶生成的影响。","authors":"Guillaume Charbonnier, Nicole M Cancelliere, Alice B Brochu, Allison M Marley, Vitor M Pereira","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New generation flow-diverting stents have benefited from recent technological advances to reduce their thrombogenicity. This in vitro study is the first of its kind to compare multiple surface modified flow diverters with their bare metal counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thrombin generation assay (TGA) was used to compare thrombin generation resulting from different stent types with glass beads (positive control) and plasma (negative control). Ten different stent types were studied, including a next-generation implant, Surpass Elite, with two different surface modifications. A thrombogram was generated from each of the 10 sample types, from which peak thrombin generation and time to peak (TTP) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the positive control and their bare metal counterparts, lower peak thrombin and longer TTP were obtained with most of the surface modified devices tested. Only the stent with an active heparin drug coating demonstrated lower peak thrombin and TTP than the negative control plasma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Generally, surface modification resulted in lower thrombogenicity, as assessed by peak thrombin concentration and TTP, when compared with the unmodified version of the device. The device with an active heparin drug coating was significantly different from other surface modifications and plasma with respect to peak thrombin and TTP, though the implications of this should be investigated through future <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrombogenicity assessment of surface-modified flow diverters: the impact of different surface modification strategies on thrombin generation in an acute <i>in vitro</i> test.\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Charbonnier, Nicole M Cancelliere, Alice B Brochu, Allison M Marley, Vitor M Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2024-022737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New generation flow-diverting stents have benefited from recent technological advances to reduce their thrombogenicity. This in vitro study is the first of its kind to compare multiple surface modified flow diverters with their bare metal counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thrombin generation assay (TGA) was used to compare thrombin generation resulting from different stent types with glass beads (positive control) and plasma (negative control). Ten different stent types were studied, including a next-generation implant, Surpass Elite, with two different surface modifications. A thrombogram was generated from each of the 10 sample types, from which peak thrombin generation and time to peak (TTP) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the positive control and their bare metal counterparts, lower peak thrombin and longer TTP were obtained with most of the surface modified devices tested. Only the stent with an active heparin drug coating demonstrated lower peak thrombin and TTP than the negative control plasma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Generally, surface modification resulted in lower thrombogenicity, as assessed by peak thrombin concentration and TTP, when compared with the unmodified version of the device. The device with an active heparin drug coating was significantly different from other surface modifications and plasma with respect to peak thrombin and TTP, though the implications of this should be investigated through future <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022737\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新一代分流支架得益于最近的技术进步,以减少其血栓形成性。这项体外研究是第一次将多种表面改性的分流器与裸金属分流器进行比较。方法:采用凝血酶生成法(TGA)比较不同支架类型玻璃微珠(阳性对照)和血浆(阴性对照)凝血酶生成情况。研究了十种不同类型的支架,包括下一代植入物,有两种不同的表面修饰。从10种样品类型中的每一种生成血栓图,从中获得凝血酶峰值生成和峰值时间(TTP)。结果:与阳性对照和裸金属对照相比,大多数表面修饰装置的凝血酶峰较低,TTP较长。只有具有活性肝素药物涂层的支架显示凝血酶和TTP的峰值低于阴性对照血浆。结论:一般来说,表面修饰导致较低的血栓形成性,通过峰值凝血酶浓度和TTP来评估,当与未修饰的设备相比。具有活性肝素药物涂层的装置与其他表面修饰和血浆在凝血酶和TTP峰值方面有显著不同,尽管这一意义应通过未来的体外和体内研究进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thrombogenicity assessment of surface-modified flow diverters: the impact of different surface modification strategies on thrombin generation in an acute in vitro test.

Background: New generation flow-diverting stents have benefited from recent technological advances to reduce their thrombogenicity. This in vitro study is the first of its kind to compare multiple surface modified flow diverters with their bare metal counterparts.

Methods: A thrombin generation assay (TGA) was used to compare thrombin generation resulting from different stent types with glass beads (positive control) and plasma (negative control). Ten different stent types were studied, including a next-generation implant, Surpass Elite, with two different surface modifications. A thrombogram was generated from each of the 10 sample types, from which peak thrombin generation and time to peak (TTP) were obtained.

Results: Compared with the positive control and their bare metal counterparts, lower peak thrombin and longer TTP were obtained with most of the surface modified devices tested. Only the stent with an active heparin drug coating demonstrated lower peak thrombin and TTP than the negative control plasma.

Conclusion: Generally, surface modification resulted in lower thrombogenicity, as assessed by peak thrombin concentration and TTP, when compared with the unmodified version of the device. The device with an active heparin drug coating was significantly different from other surface modifications and plasma with respect to peak thrombin and TTP, though the implications of this should be investigated through future in vitro and in vivo studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信