Angela M Stover, Dana Mueller, Jessica Carda-Auten, Alison Hilton, Victoria Tsurutis, Angela B Smith
{"title":"对复发性LG-IR-NMIBC患者手术常规/责任的感知影响和非手术主要治疗选择:远景3期试验结果","authors":"Angela M Stover, Dana Mueller, Jessica Carda-Auten, Alison Hilton, Victoria Tsurutis, Angela B Smith","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adults with low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer commonly ask urologists how their routine/responsibilities will be affected by treatments, including the standard of care, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). We asked patients in the ENVISION trial to compare TURBT with a nonsurgical primary treatment (UGN-102 containing mitomycin) for acceptability and impact on their routine/responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ENVISION is a phase 3, single-arm trial where UGN-102 was administered as 6 weekly intravesical instillations. Interviews with US patients were conducted at enrollment (before instillations) and 3 months (primary trial end point). Transcripts were coded by 3 coders using the gold standard of content analysis to derive interview themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one US patients from 31 sites were eligible, and 29 of 41 completed both interviews. Most of the participating patients were male (62%), White (83%), and of age 65+ years (69%). Three themes were derived: (1) Patients perceived that TURBT interfered more with their routine/responsibilities. (2) Urinary symptoms were perceived to be similar, but bleeding, catheter issues, and time to resuming sexual activity lasted longer with TURBT. For UGN-102, uncommon reports were internal itching and difficulty keeping gel in the bladder during instillations. (3) Patients would recommend UGN-102 to other patients because it was perceived to be less invasive, painful, and time-consuming than TURBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients perceived UGN-102 to be a favorable primary treatment alternative to traditional surgical resections for low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. By focusing on the underexplored area of patient perceptions, this study provides key information urologists will need to conduct shared decision-making conversations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05243550.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"18-31"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Impact on Patient Routines/Responsibilities for Surgery and a Nonsurgical Primary Treatment Option in Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Findings From the ENVISION Phase 3 Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Angela M Stover, Dana Mueller, Jessica Carda-Auten, Alison Hilton, Victoria Tsurutis, Angela B Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adults with low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer commonly ask urologists how their routine/responsibilities will be affected by treatments, including the standard of care, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). We asked patients in the ENVISION trial to compare TURBT with a nonsurgical primary treatment (UGN-102 containing mitomycin) for acceptability and impact on their routine/responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ENVISION is a phase 3, single-arm trial where UGN-102 was administered as 6 weekly intravesical instillations. Interviews with US patients were conducted at enrollment (before instillations) and 3 months (primary trial end point). Transcripts were coded by 3 coders using the gold standard of content analysis to derive interview themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one US patients from 31 sites were eligible, and 29 of 41 completed both interviews. Most of the participating patients were male (62%), White (83%), and of age 65+ years (69%). Three themes were derived: (1) Patients perceived that TURBT interfered more with their routine/responsibilities. (2) Urinary symptoms were perceived to be similar, but bleeding, catheter issues, and time to resuming sexual activity lasted longer with TURBT. For UGN-102, uncommon reports were internal itching and difficulty keeping gel in the bladder during instillations. (3) Patients would recommend UGN-102 to other patients because it was perceived to be less invasive, painful, and time-consuming than TURBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients perceived UGN-102 to be a favorable primary treatment alternative to traditional surgical resections for low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. By focusing on the underexplored area of patient perceptions, this study provides key information urologists will need to conduct shared decision-making conversations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05243550.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004511\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceived Impact on Patient Routines/Responsibilities for Surgery and a Nonsurgical Primary Treatment Option in Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Findings From the ENVISION Phase 3 Trial.
Purpose: Adults with low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer commonly ask urologists how their routine/responsibilities will be affected by treatments, including the standard of care, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). We asked patients in the ENVISION trial to compare TURBT with a nonsurgical primary treatment (UGN-102 containing mitomycin) for acceptability and impact on their routine/responsibilities.
Materials and methods: ENVISION is a phase 3, single-arm trial where UGN-102 was administered as 6 weekly intravesical instillations. Interviews with US patients were conducted at enrollment (before instillations) and 3 months (primary trial end point). Transcripts were coded by 3 coders using the gold standard of content analysis to derive interview themes.
Results: Forty-one US patients from 31 sites were eligible, and 29 of 41 completed both interviews. Most of the participating patients were male (62%), White (83%), and of age 65+ years (69%). Three themes were derived: (1) Patients perceived that TURBT interfered more with their routine/responsibilities. (2) Urinary symptoms were perceived to be similar, but bleeding, catheter issues, and time to resuming sexual activity lasted longer with TURBT. For UGN-102, uncommon reports were internal itching and difficulty keeping gel in the bladder during instillations. (3) Patients would recommend UGN-102 to other patients because it was perceived to be less invasive, painful, and time-consuming than TURBT.
Conclusions: Patients perceived UGN-102 to be a favorable primary treatment alternative to traditional surgical resections for low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. By focusing on the underexplored area of patient perceptions, this study provides key information urologists will need to conduct shared decision-making conversations.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.