对复发性LG-IR-NMIBC患者手术常规/责任的感知影响和非手术主要治疗选择:远景3期试验结果

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004511
Angela M Stover, Dana Mueller, Jessica Carda-Auten, Alison Hilton, Victoria Tsurutis, Angela B Smith
{"title":"对复发性LG-IR-NMIBC患者手术常规/责任的感知影响和非手术主要治疗选择:远景3期试验结果","authors":"Angela M Stover, Dana Mueller, Jessica Carda-Auten, Alison Hilton, Victoria Tsurutis, Angela B Smith","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adults with low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer commonly ask urologists how their routine/responsibilities will be affected by treatments, including the standard of care, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). We asked patients in the ENVISION trial to compare TURBT with a nonsurgical primary treatment (UGN-102 containing mitomycin) for acceptability and impact on their routine/responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ENVISION is a phase 3, single-arm trial where UGN-102 was administered as 6 weekly intravesical instillations. Interviews with US patients were conducted at enrollment (before instillations) and 3 months (primary trial end point). Transcripts were coded by 3 coders using the gold standard of content analysis to derive interview themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one US patients from 31 sites were eligible, and 29 of 41 completed both interviews. Most of the participating patients were male (62%), White (83%), and of age 65+ years (69%). Three themes were derived: (1) Patients perceived that TURBT interfered more with their routine/responsibilities. (2) Urinary symptoms were perceived to be similar, but bleeding, catheter issues, and time to resuming sexual activity lasted longer with TURBT. For UGN-102, uncommon reports were internal itching and difficulty keeping gel in the bladder during instillations. (3) Patients would recommend UGN-102 to other patients because it was perceived to be less invasive, painful, and time-consuming than TURBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients perceived UGN-102 to be a favorable primary treatment alternative to traditional surgical resections for low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. By focusing on the underexplored area of patient perceptions, this study provides key information urologists will need to conduct shared decision-making conversations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05243550.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"18-31"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Impact on Patient Routines/Responsibilities for Surgery and a Nonsurgical Primary Treatment Option in Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Findings From the ENVISION Phase 3 Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Angela M Stover, Dana Mueller, Jessica Carda-Auten, Alison Hilton, Victoria Tsurutis, Angela B Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adults with low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer commonly ask urologists how their routine/responsibilities will be affected by treatments, including the standard of care, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). We asked patients in the ENVISION trial to compare TURBT with a nonsurgical primary treatment (UGN-102 containing mitomycin) for acceptability and impact on their routine/responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ENVISION is a phase 3, single-arm trial where UGN-102 was administered as 6 weekly intravesical instillations. Interviews with US patients were conducted at enrollment (before instillations) and 3 months (primary trial end point). Transcripts were coded by 3 coders using the gold standard of content analysis to derive interview themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one US patients from 31 sites were eligible, and 29 of 41 completed both interviews. Most of the participating patients were male (62%), White (83%), and of age 65+ years (69%). Three themes were derived: (1) Patients perceived that TURBT interfered more with their routine/responsibilities. (2) Urinary symptoms were perceived to be similar, but bleeding, catheter issues, and time to resuming sexual activity lasted longer with TURBT. For UGN-102, uncommon reports were internal itching and difficulty keeping gel in the bladder during instillations. (3) Patients would recommend UGN-102 to other patients because it was perceived to be less invasive, painful, and time-consuming than TURBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients perceived UGN-102 to be a favorable primary treatment alternative to traditional surgical resections for low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. By focusing on the underexplored area of patient perceptions, this study provides key information urologists will need to conduct shared decision-making conversations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05243550.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004511\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患有低级别、中危性非肌浸润性膀胱癌(lgir - nmibc)的成人患者通常会询问泌尿科医生他们的常规/职责将如何受到治疗的影响,包括标准护理、经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)。在ENVISION试验(NCT05243550)中,我们要求患者比较TURBT与非手术初级治疗(含丝裂霉素的UGN-102)的可接受性和对其日常/责任的影响。材料和方法:ENVISION (NCT05243550)是一项3期单臂试验,UGN-102被每周一次静脉滴注。在入组(注射前)和3个月(主要试验终点)时对美国患者进行访谈。三名编码员使用内容分析的黄金标准来推导访谈主题,对笔录进行编码。结果:来自31个地点的41名美国患者符合条件,其中29/41完成了两项访谈。大多数参与者是男性(62%),白人(83%)和65岁以上(69%)。得出三个主题:1)患者认为TURBT更多地干扰了他们的日常/责任。2)泌尿系统症状被认为是相似的,但出血、导尿管问题和恢复性活动的时间比TURBT持续更长。对于UGN-102,不常见的报告是在注射过程中出现内部瘙痒和难以将凝胶保持在膀胱内。3)患者会向其他患者推荐UGN-102,因为与TURBT相比,UGN-102侵入性小、疼痛小、耗时短。结论:患者认为UGN-102是替代传统手术切除lgir - nmibc的首选治疗方案。通过关注未被探索的患者感知领域,本研究提供了泌尿科医生将需要进行共同决策对话的关键信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived Impact on Patient Routines/Responsibilities for Surgery and a Nonsurgical Primary Treatment Option in Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Findings From the ENVISION Phase 3 Trial.

Purpose: Adults with low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer commonly ask urologists how their routine/responsibilities will be affected by treatments, including the standard of care, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). We asked patients in the ENVISION trial to compare TURBT with a nonsurgical primary treatment (UGN-102 containing mitomycin) for acceptability and impact on their routine/responsibilities.

Materials and methods: ENVISION is a phase 3, single-arm trial where UGN-102 was administered as 6 weekly intravesical instillations. Interviews with US patients were conducted at enrollment (before instillations) and 3 months (primary trial end point). Transcripts were coded by 3 coders using the gold standard of content analysis to derive interview themes.

Results: Forty-one US patients from 31 sites were eligible, and 29 of 41 completed both interviews. Most of the participating patients were male (62%), White (83%), and of age 65+ years (69%). Three themes were derived: (1) Patients perceived that TURBT interfered more with their routine/responsibilities. (2) Urinary symptoms were perceived to be similar, but bleeding, catheter issues, and time to resuming sexual activity lasted longer with TURBT. For UGN-102, uncommon reports were internal itching and difficulty keeping gel in the bladder during instillations. (3) Patients would recommend UGN-102 to other patients because it was perceived to be less invasive, painful, and time-consuming than TURBT.

Conclusions: Patients perceived UGN-102 to be a favorable primary treatment alternative to traditional surgical resections for low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. By focusing on the underexplored area of patient perceptions, this study provides key information urologists will need to conduct shared decision-making conversations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05243550.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信