早期职业传播与实施研究者的跨学科研究合作建议:一项多阶段研究。

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.684
Hannah G Lane, Sallie D Allgood, Julie Schexnayder, Hayden B Bosworth, Ana A Baumann, Allison A Lewinski
{"title":"早期职业传播与实施研究者的跨学科研究合作建议:一项多阶段研究。","authors":"Hannah G Lane, Sallie D Allgood, Julie Schexnayder, Hayden B Bosworth, Ana A Baumann, Allison A Lewinski","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dissemination and implementation (D&I) scientists are key members of collaborative, interdisciplinary clinical and translational research teams. Yet, early career D&I researchers (ECRs) have few guidelines for cultivating productive research collaborations. We developed recommendations for ECRs in D&I when serving as collaborators or co-investigators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a consensus-building approach: (1) group discussions to identify 3 areas of interest: \"Marketing yourself\" (describing your value to non-D&I collaborators), \"Collaboration considerations<i>\"</i> (contributions during proposal development), and \"Responsibilities following project initiation\" (defining your role throughout projects); (2) first survey and focus groups to iteratively rank/refine sub-domains within each area; (3) second survey and expert input on clarity/content of sub-domains; and (4) iterative development of key recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four D&I researchers completed the first survey, 12 of whom attended one of three focus groups. Twenty-nine D&I researchers completed the second survey (<i>n</i> = 29) and 10 experts provided input. We identified 25 recommendations. Findings suggest unique collaboration strengths (e.g, partnership-building) and challenges (e.g., unclear link to career milestones) for ECR D&I researchers, and underscore the value of ongoing training and mentorship for ECRs and the need to intersect collaborative D&I efforts with health equity principles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research collaborations are essential in clinical and translational research. We identified recommendations for D&I ECRs to be productive research collaborators, including training and support needs for the field. Findings suggest an opportunity to examine research collaboration needs among early career D&I scientists, and provide guidance on how to successfully provide mentorship and integrate health equity principles into collaborative research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for interdisciplinary research collaboration for early career dissemination and implementation researchers: A multi-phase study.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah G Lane, Sallie D Allgood, Julie Schexnayder, Hayden B Bosworth, Ana A Baumann, Allison A Lewinski\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2024.684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dissemination and implementation (D&I) scientists are key members of collaborative, interdisciplinary clinical and translational research teams. Yet, early career D&I researchers (ECRs) have few guidelines for cultivating productive research collaborations. We developed recommendations for ECRs in D&I when serving as collaborators or co-investigators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a consensus-building approach: (1) group discussions to identify 3 areas of interest: \\\"Marketing yourself\\\" (describing your value to non-D&I collaborators), \\\"Collaboration considerations<i>\\\"</i> (contributions during proposal development), and \\\"Responsibilities following project initiation\\\" (defining your role throughout projects); (2) first survey and focus groups to iteratively rank/refine sub-domains within each area; (3) second survey and expert input on clarity/content of sub-domains; and (4) iterative development of key recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four D&I researchers completed the first survey, 12 of whom attended one of three focus groups. Twenty-nine D&I researchers completed the second survey (<i>n</i> = 29) and 10 experts provided input. We identified 25 recommendations. Findings suggest unique collaboration strengths (e.g, partnership-building) and challenges (e.g., unclear link to career milestones) for ECR D&I researchers, and underscore the value of ongoing training and mentorship for ECRs and the need to intersect collaborative D&I efforts with health equity principles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research collaborations are essential in clinical and translational research. We identified recommendations for D&I ECRs to be productive research collaborators, including training and support needs for the field. Findings suggest an opportunity to examine research collaboration needs among early career D&I scientists, and provide guidance on how to successfully provide mentorship and integrate health equity principles into collaborative research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883575/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传播与实施(D&I)科学家是协作、跨学科临床和转化研究团队的关键成员。然而,早期职业D&I研究人员(ecr)几乎没有培养富有成效的研究合作的指导方针。作为合作者或共同研究者,我们为D&I中的ecr提出了建议。方法:我们采用了建立共识的方法:(1)小组讨论以确定3个感兴趣的领域:“营销你自己”(向非d&i合作者描述你的价值),“协作考虑”(提案开发期间的贡献),以及“项目启动后的责任”(在整个项目中定义你的角色);(2)首先进行调查和焦点小组,迭代地对每个区域内的子域进行排序/细化;(3)对子领域的清晰度/内容进行二次调查和专家意见;(4)重点建议的迭代开发。结果:44名D&I研究人员完成了第一次调查,其中12人参加了三个焦点小组中的一个。29名D&I研究人员完成了第二次调查(n = 29), 10名专家提供了意见。我们确定了25条建议。研究结果表明,ECR D&I研究人员具有独特的合作优势(例如,建立伙伴关系)和挑战(例如,与职业里程碑的联系不明确),并强调了对ECR进行持续培训和指导的价值,以及将合作D&I工作与卫生公平原则相结合的必要性。结论:研究合作在临床和转化研究中至关重要。我们确定了D&I ecr成为富有成效的研究合作者的建议,包括该领域的培训和支持需求。研究结果表明,有机会研究早期职业D&I科学家之间的研究合作需求,并就如何成功地提供指导和将卫生公平原则纳入合作研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommendations for interdisciplinary research collaboration for early career dissemination and implementation researchers: A multi-phase study.

Introduction: Dissemination and implementation (D&I) scientists are key members of collaborative, interdisciplinary clinical and translational research teams. Yet, early career D&I researchers (ECRs) have few guidelines for cultivating productive research collaborations. We developed recommendations for ECRs in D&I when serving as collaborators or co-investigators.

Methods: We employed a consensus-building approach: (1) group discussions to identify 3 areas of interest: "Marketing yourself" (describing your value to non-D&I collaborators), "Collaboration considerations" (contributions during proposal development), and "Responsibilities following project initiation" (defining your role throughout projects); (2) first survey and focus groups to iteratively rank/refine sub-domains within each area; (3) second survey and expert input on clarity/content of sub-domains; and (4) iterative development of key recommendations.

Results: Forty-four D&I researchers completed the first survey, 12 of whom attended one of three focus groups. Twenty-nine D&I researchers completed the second survey (n = 29) and 10 experts provided input. We identified 25 recommendations. Findings suggest unique collaboration strengths (e.g, partnership-building) and challenges (e.g., unclear link to career milestones) for ECR D&I researchers, and underscore the value of ongoing training and mentorship for ECRs and the need to intersect collaborative D&I efforts with health equity principles.

Conclusions: Research collaborations are essential in clinical and translational research. We identified recommendations for D&I ECRs to be productive research collaborators, including training and support needs for the field. Findings suggest an opportunity to examine research collaboration needs among early career D&I scientists, and provide guidance on how to successfully provide mentorship and integrate health equity principles into collaborative research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信