{"title":"四钩针定位治疗肺部磨砂玻璃结节的疗效:单中心回顾性分析。","authors":"Yonghui Wu, Jiannan Xu, Kai Zhang, Yuanheng Huang, Jian Zhang, Huiguo Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13019-025-03371-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules (GGNs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 1, 2021, to May 31, 2024, 194 patients were diagnosed with one or more GGNs by computed tomography (CT) scan and underwent preoperative CT-guided 4-hook needle localization followed by video-assisted thoracoscope surgery (VATS) wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. There were 226 nodules in all patients. We analyzed the 4-hook needle localization safety, complications, safe margin and localization depth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-hook needle localizations success rate was 100% and didn't take place in displacement and dislodgment. The tumor margin distance is about 5-20 mm and all tumor margin was negative thorough final pathology result. 9 patients occurred small parenchymal hemorrhage, 13 patients occurred small pneumothorax and 8 patients occurred small hemoptysis, those complications needn't intervene or tackle and didn't affect surgery. Compared upper and middle lobe to lower lobe, localization time was 13.92 ± 4.6 min vs 13.66 ± 4.28 min respectively, p = 0.69, there was no significant statistical difference. Localization depth was 18.63 ± 7.8 mm vs 15.87 ± 8.52 mm respectively, p = 0.02, there were statistical differences, but the margin tumor distance was 5.16 ± 4.94 mm vs 4.93 ± 3.64 mm, p = 0.73 respectively, there was no statistical difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative 4-hook needle localization is safe and feasible for GGNs. Guided by 4-hook needle localization, wedge resection can ensure enough safe margins and patient was well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules: a single-center retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yonghui Wu, Jiannan Xu, Kai Zhang, Yuanheng Huang, Jian Zhang, Huiguo Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13019-025-03371-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules (GGNs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 1, 2021, to May 31, 2024, 194 patients were diagnosed with one or more GGNs by computed tomography (CT) scan and underwent preoperative CT-guided 4-hook needle localization followed by video-assisted thoracoscope surgery (VATS) wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. There were 226 nodules in all patients. We analyzed the 4-hook needle localization safety, complications, safe margin and localization depth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-hook needle localizations success rate was 100% and didn't take place in displacement and dislodgment. The tumor margin distance is about 5-20 mm and all tumor margin was negative thorough final pathology result. 9 patients occurred small parenchymal hemorrhage, 13 patients occurred small pneumothorax and 8 patients occurred small hemoptysis, those complications needn't intervene or tackle and didn't affect surgery. Compared upper and middle lobe to lower lobe, localization time was 13.92 ± 4.6 min vs 13.66 ± 4.28 min respectively, p = 0.69, there was no significant statistical difference. Localization depth was 18.63 ± 7.8 mm vs 15.87 ± 8.52 mm respectively, p = 0.02, there were statistical differences, but the margin tumor distance was 5.16 ± 4.94 mm vs 4.93 ± 3.64 mm, p = 0.73 respectively, there was no statistical difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative 4-hook needle localization is safe and feasible for GGNs. Guided by 4-hook needle localization, wedge resection can ensure enough safe margins and patient was well tolerated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884200/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03371-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03371-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:本研究的目的是评估四钩针定位治疗肺磨玻璃结节(GGNs)的疗效。方法:自2021年11月1日至2024年5月31日,194例经CT扫描诊断为1个或多个ggn的患者,术前行CT引导下4钩针定位,然后行胸腔镜手术(VATS)楔形切除、节段切除或肺叶切除术。所有患者有226个结节。分析4钩针定位安全性、并发症、安全裕度及定位深度。结果:4钩针定位成功率100%,无移位、脱位现象。肿瘤边缘距离约5 ~ 20mm,最终病理结果均为阴性。发生小实质出血9例,小气胸13例,小咯血8例,这些并发症无需干预和处理,不影响手术。上、中肺叶与下肺叶比较,定位时间分别为13.92±4.6 min vs 13.66±4.28 min, p = 0.69,差异无统计学意义。定位深度分别为18.63±7.8 mm vs 15.87±8.52 mm, p = 0.02,差异有统计学意义;边缘肿瘤距离分别为5.16±4.94 mm vs 4.93±3.64 mm, p = 0.73,差异无统计学意义。结论:术前4钩针定位ggn是安全可行的。在4钩针定位引导下,楔形切除能保证足够的安全切缘,患者耐受性好。
The efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules (GGNs).
Methods: From November 1, 2021, to May 31, 2024, 194 patients were diagnosed with one or more GGNs by computed tomography (CT) scan and underwent preoperative CT-guided 4-hook needle localization followed by video-assisted thoracoscope surgery (VATS) wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. There were 226 nodules in all patients. We analyzed the 4-hook needle localization safety, complications, safe margin and localization depth.
Results: The 4-hook needle localizations success rate was 100% and didn't take place in displacement and dislodgment. The tumor margin distance is about 5-20 mm and all tumor margin was negative thorough final pathology result. 9 patients occurred small parenchymal hemorrhage, 13 patients occurred small pneumothorax and 8 patients occurred small hemoptysis, those complications needn't intervene or tackle and didn't affect surgery. Compared upper and middle lobe to lower lobe, localization time was 13.92 ± 4.6 min vs 13.66 ± 4.28 min respectively, p = 0.69, there was no significant statistical difference. Localization depth was 18.63 ± 7.8 mm vs 15.87 ± 8.52 mm respectively, p = 0.02, there were statistical differences, but the margin tumor distance was 5.16 ± 4.94 mm vs 4.93 ± 3.64 mm, p = 0.73 respectively, there was no statistical difference.
Conclusions: Preoperative 4-hook needle localization is safe and feasible for GGNs. Guided by 4-hook needle localization, wedge resection can ensure enough safe margins and patient was well tolerated.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields.
Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials.
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.