职业性噪声暴露中的氧化应激标志物:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Soheil Rahmati, Sogand Sadeghi, Mahmood Moosazadeh
{"title":"职业性噪声暴露中的氧化应激标志物:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Soheil Rahmati, Sogand Sadeghi, Mahmood Moosazadeh","doi":"10.1007/s00420-025-02131-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to occupational noise could lead to detrimental health outcomes by inducing oxidative stress mechanisms. In this study, we sought to investigate the impact of occupational noise exposure on serum and/or plasma levels of oxidative stress markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a thorough search across PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for articles comparing oxidative stress markers, including malondialdehyde (MDA) and/or superoxide dismutase (SOD) and/or glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and/or total antioxidant capacity (TAC), in individuals occupationally exposed to high noise and unexposed controls. The random-effects model was applied to determine the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the associated 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven primary studies were included. The analysis encompassed a total of 989 workers, including 537 individuals exposed to occupational noise levels exceeding 85 dB and 452 workers exposed to noise below 85 dB. Meta-analysis indicated that workers with high noise exposure exhibited significantly elevated TAC levels (SMD, 2.74; 95% CI: 1.87 to 3.61; p = 0.00; I<sup>2</sup> = 88.75%) and SOD levels (SMD, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.33; p = 0.00; I<sup>2</sup> = 69.32%), while no significant differences were observed among the groups regarding MDA levels (SMD, 1.03; 95% CI, -0.12 to 2.18; p = 0.08; I<sup>2</sup> = 97.30%) and GPx levels (SMD, 1.35; 95% CI, -0.41 to 3.11; p = 0.13; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that TAC and SOD levels are elevated in workers exposed to high noise, potentially indicating heightened free radical production. However, no significant differences were found in MDA and GPx levels, warranting further investigation. Early detection and intervention may help reduce the harmful health impacts of noise exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13761,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":"155-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxidative stress markers in occupational noise exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Soheil Rahmati, Sogand Sadeghi, Mahmood Moosazadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00420-025-02131-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to occupational noise could lead to detrimental health outcomes by inducing oxidative stress mechanisms. In this study, we sought to investigate the impact of occupational noise exposure on serum and/or plasma levels of oxidative stress markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a thorough search across PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for articles comparing oxidative stress markers, including malondialdehyde (MDA) and/or superoxide dismutase (SOD) and/or glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and/or total antioxidant capacity (TAC), in individuals occupationally exposed to high noise and unexposed controls. The random-effects model was applied to determine the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the associated 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven primary studies were included. The analysis encompassed a total of 989 workers, including 537 individuals exposed to occupational noise levels exceeding 85 dB and 452 workers exposed to noise below 85 dB. Meta-analysis indicated that workers with high noise exposure exhibited significantly elevated TAC levels (SMD, 2.74; 95% CI: 1.87 to 3.61; p = 0.00; I<sup>2</sup> = 88.75%) and SOD levels (SMD, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.33; p = 0.00; I<sup>2</sup> = 69.32%), while no significant differences were observed among the groups regarding MDA levels (SMD, 1.03; 95% CI, -0.12 to 2.18; p = 0.08; I<sup>2</sup> = 97.30%) and GPx levels (SMD, 1.35; 95% CI, -0.41 to 3.11; p = 0.13; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that TAC and SOD levels are elevated in workers exposed to high noise, potentially indicating heightened free radical production. However, no significant differences were found in MDA and GPx levels, warranting further investigation. Early detection and intervention may help reduce the harmful health impacts of noise exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"155-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-025-02131-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-025-02131-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:职业性噪声暴露可通过诱导氧化应激机制导致有害的健康结果。在这项研究中,我们试图调查职业性噪声暴露对血清和/或血浆氧化应激标志物水平的影响。方法:我们在PubMed, Web of Science和SCOPUS中进行了全面的搜索,以比较氧化应激标志物,包括丙二醛(MDA)和/或超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和/或谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GPx)和/或总抗氧化能力(TAC),在职业暴露于高噪音和未暴露的对照个体中。采用随机效应模型确定标准化平均差(SMD)和相关的95%置信区间(CI)。结果:纳入了7项初步研究。该分析共涉及989名工人,其中537名工人的职业噪声水平超过85分贝,452名工人的噪声水平低于85分贝。荟萃分析表明,高噪声暴露的工人TAC水平显著升高(SMD, 2.74;95% CI: 1.87 ~ 3.61;p = 0.00;I2 = 88.75%)和SOD水平(SMD, 0.90;95% CI, 0.47 ~ 1.33;p = 0.00;I2 = 69.32%),各组间MDA水平差异无统计学意义(SMD, 1.03;95% CI, -0.12 ~ 2.18;p = 0.08;I2 = 97.30%)和GPx水平(SMD, 1.35;95% CI, -0.41 ~ 3.11;p = 0.13;i2 = 98.63%)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,接触高噪音的工人TAC和SOD水平升高,可能表明自由基产生增加。但MDA和GPx水平无显著性差异,值得进一步研究。早期发现和干预可能有助于减少噪声暴露对健康的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oxidative stress markers in occupational noise exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Exposure to occupational noise could lead to detrimental health outcomes by inducing oxidative stress mechanisms. In this study, we sought to investigate the impact of occupational noise exposure on serum and/or plasma levels of oxidative stress markers.

Methods: We performed a thorough search across PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for articles comparing oxidative stress markers, including malondialdehyde (MDA) and/or superoxide dismutase (SOD) and/or glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and/or total antioxidant capacity (TAC), in individuals occupationally exposed to high noise and unexposed controls. The random-effects model was applied to determine the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the associated 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Seven primary studies were included. The analysis encompassed a total of 989 workers, including 537 individuals exposed to occupational noise levels exceeding 85 dB and 452 workers exposed to noise below 85 dB. Meta-analysis indicated that workers with high noise exposure exhibited significantly elevated TAC levels (SMD, 2.74; 95% CI: 1.87 to 3.61; p = 0.00; I2 = 88.75%) and SOD levels (SMD, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.33; p = 0.00; I2 = 69.32%), while no significant differences were observed among the groups regarding MDA levels (SMD, 1.03; 95% CI, -0.12 to 2.18; p = 0.08; I2 = 97.30%) and GPx levels (SMD, 1.35; 95% CI, -0.41 to 3.11; p = 0.13; I2 = 98.63%).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that TAC and SOD levels are elevated in workers exposed to high noise, potentially indicating heightened free radical production. However, no significant differences were found in MDA and GPx levels, warranting further investigation. Early detection and intervention may help reduce the harmful health impacts of noise exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health publishes Editorials, Review Articles, Original Articles, and Letters to the Editor. It welcomes any manuscripts dealing with occupational or ambient environmental problems, with a special interest in research at the interface of occupational health and clinical medicine. The scope ranges from Biological Monitoring to Dermatology, from Fibers and Dust to Human Toxicology, from Nanomaterials and Ultra-fine Dust to Night- and Shift Work, from Psycho-mental Distress and Burnout to Vibrations. A complete list of topics can be found on the right-hand side under For authors and editors. In addition, all papers should be based on present-day standards and relate to: -Clinical and epidemiological studies on morbidity and mortality -Clinical epidemiological studies on the parameters relevant to the estimation of health risks -Human experimental studies on environmental health effects. Animal experiments are only acceptable if relevant to pathogenic aspects. -Methods for studying the topics mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信