直接肝内门静脉分流术与其他主要放射治疗在Budd-Chiari综合征中的比较。

IF 2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sayan Malakar, Nishant Shah, Umair Shamsul Hoda, Avinash D Gautam, Rajanikant R Yadav, Srikanth Kothalkar, Rahul Jangra, Gaurav Pandey, Akash Roy, Praveer Rai, Samir Mohindra, Uday C Ghoshal
{"title":"直接肝内门静脉分流术与其他主要放射治疗在Budd-Chiari综合征中的比较。","authors":"Sayan Malakar, Nishant Shah, Umair Shamsul Hoda, Avinash D Gautam, Rajanikant R Yadav, Srikanth Kothalkar, Rahul Jangra, Gaurav Pandey, Akash Roy, Praveer Rai, Samir Mohindra, Uday C Ghoshal","doi":"10.1007/s12664-024-01733-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiological interventions in Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) include anatomical recanalization of the hepatic vein (HV), inferior vena cava (IVC) angioplasty and stenting. In case of technical difficulty and anatomical non-feasibility, an ultrasound-guided direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPSS) is created. We aimed at evaluating the outcome of patients managed with DIPSS and comparing it with anatomical recanalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved the data of patients with BCS managed at our institution between 2011 and 2021. Safety, efficacy and long-term outcomes were assessed and compared between radiological interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 236 patients with BCS underwent radiological intervention in the study period. As many as 96 patients were excluded and 140 patients were included in the final analysis. The majority were males (F:M = 54:86). The median age at the time of diagnosis was 30 years (interquartile range: 25-37 years). The median follow-up period was 58 (14-72) months. On imaging, 53% (74) patients had combined HV and IVC block followed by isolated HV block in 54 patients (38.5%) and isolated IVC block in 12 patients (8.5%). As many as 32 patients were managed by DIPSS. Among others, 56 patients underwent IVC angioplasty with HV stenting and 30 required HV angioplasty and stenting. DIPSS had a comparable technical success rate (100% vs. 98.2% vs. 96%, respectively p > 0.5). However, the median stent patency was higher in the DIPSS group (72 [48-96] months) compared to IVC angioplasty and HV stenting (46 [36-60] months; p = 0.02) and HV angioplasty-stenting (42 [30-48] months; p = 0.04) groups. They had similar re-thrombosis rates (28%, 34% and 21%, respectively; p > 0.05). Overall complications were rare (3.5%) and no patient in the DIPSS group had adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DIPSS is a safe and effective salvage procedure with an excellent long-term outcome in patients with BCS. It has a longer median stent patency compared to the anatomical recanalization group.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and other major radiological interventions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Sayan Malakar, Nishant Shah, Umair Shamsul Hoda, Avinash D Gautam, Rajanikant R Yadav, Srikanth Kothalkar, Rahul Jangra, Gaurav Pandey, Akash Roy, Praveer Rai, Samir Mohindra, Uday C Ghoshal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12664-024-01733-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiological interventions in Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) include anatomical recanalization of the hepatic vein (HV), inferior vena cava (IVC) angioplasty and stenting. In case of technical difficulty and anatomical non-feasibility, an ultrasound-guided direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPSS) is created. We aimed at evaluating the outcome of patients managed with DIPSS and comparing it with anatomical recanalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved the data of patients with BCS managed at our institution between 2011 and 2021. Safety, efficacy and long-term outcomes were assessed and compared between radiological interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 236 patients with BCS underwent radiological intervention in the study period. As many as 96 patients were excluded and 140 patients were included in the final analysis. The majority were males (F:M = 54:86). The median age at the time of diagnosis was 30 years (interquartile range: 25-37 years). The median follow-up period was 58 (14-72) months. On imaging, 53% (74) patients had combined HV and IVC block followed by isolated HV block in 54 patients (38.5%) and isolated IVC block in 12 patients (8.5%). As many as 32 patients were managed by DIPSS. Among others, 56 patients underwent IVC angioplasty with HV stenting and 30 required HV angioplasty and stenting. DIPSS had a comparable technical success rate (100% vs. 98.2% vs. 96%, respectively p > 0.5). However, the median stent patency was higher in the DIPSS group (72 [48-96] months) compared to IVC angioplasty and HV stenting (46 [36-60] months; p = 0.02) and HV angioplasty-stenting (42 [30-48] months; p = 0.04) groups. They had similar re-thrombosis rates (28%, 34% and 21%, respectively; p > 0.05). Overall complications were rare (3.5%) and no patient in the DIPSS group had adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DIPSS is a safe and effective salvage procedure with an excellent long-term outcome in patients with BCS. It has a longer median stent patency compared to the anatomical recanalization group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01733-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01733-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:Budd-Chiari综合征(BCS)的放射治疗包括解剖性肝静脉再通(HV)、下腔静脉血管成形术和支架植入术。在技术困难和解剖不可行的情况下,超声引导下直接肝内门静脉分流术(DIPSS)被创建。我们旨在评估DIPSS患者的治疗结果,并将其与解剖再通术进行比较。方法:我们检索了2011年至2021年在我院管理的BCS患者的数据。评估和比较放射干预的安全性、有效性和长期结果。结果:研究期间共有236例BCS患者接受了放射治疗。多达96例患者被排除,140例患者被纳入最终分析。男性居多(F:M = 54:86)。诊断时的中位年龄为30岁(四分位数范围:25-37岁)。中位随访期为58(14-72)个月。影像学方面,53%(74)患者合并HV和IVC阻滞,接着是54例(38.5%)单独的HV阻滞和12例(8.5%)单独的IVC阻滞。采用DIPSS治疗的患者多达32例。其中56例患者行下腔静脉血管成形术合并HV支架置入,30例患者行HV血管成形术合并支架置入。DIPSS具有相当的技术成功率(100% vs. 98.2% vs. 96%,分别p < 0.05)。然而,DIPSS组中位支架通畅度(72[48-96]个月)高于IVC血管成形术和HV支架成形术(46[36-60]个月);p = 0.02)和HV血管成形术支架植入术(42[30-48]个月;p = 0.04)组。他们的再血栓率相似(分别为28%、34%和21%);p > 0.05)。总体并发症罕见(3.5%),DIPSS组无患者出现不良事件。结论:DIPSS是一种安全有效的治疗BCS的方法,长期疗效良好。与解剖再通组相比,它有更长的正中支架通畅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and other major radiological interventions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Introduction: Radiological interventions in Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) include anatomical recanalization of the hepatic vein (HV), inferior vena cava (IVC) angioplasty and stenting. In case of technical difficulty and anatomical non-feasibility, an ultrasound-guided direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPSS) is created. We aimed at evaluating the outcome of patients managed with DIPSS and comparing it with anatomical recanalization.

Methods: We retrieved the data of patients with BCS managed at our institution between 2011 and 2021. Safety, efficacy and long-term outcomes were assessed and compared between radiological interventions.

Results: Total 236 patients with BCS underwent radiological intervention in the study period. As many as 96 patients were excluded and 140 patients were included in the final analysis. The majority were males (F:M = 54:86). The median age at the time of diagnosis was 30 years (interquartile range: 25-37 years). The median follow-up period was 58 (14-72) months. On imaging, 53% (74) patients had combined HV and IVC block followed by isolated HV block in 54 patients (38.5%) and isolated IVC block in 12 patients (8.5%). As many as 32 patients were managed by DIPSS. Among others, 56 patients underwent IVC angioplasty with HV stenting and 30 required HV angioplasty and stenting. DIPSS had a comparable technical success rate (100% vs. 98.2% vs. 96%, respectively p > 0.5). However, the median stent patency was higher in the DIPSS group (72 [48-96] months) compared to IVC angioplasty and HV stenting (46 [36-60] months; p = 0.02) and HV angioplasty-stenting (42 [30-48] months; p = 0.04) groups. They had similar re-thrombosis rates (28%, 34% and 21%, respectively; p > 0.05). Overall complications were rare (3.5%) and no patient in the DIPSS group had adverse events.

Conclusion: DIPSS is a safe and effective salvage procedure with an excellent long-term outcome in patients with BCS. It has a longer median stent patency compared to the anatomical recanalization group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信