印度尼西亚万隆市结核病高危人群中标准E TB- feron ELISA和标准F TB- feron FIA阳性率及其与QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus的一致性

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-04-09 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01486-24
Dewi Kartika Turbawaty, Syifa Nur Maulida, Darin Rizka Anadhea, Mulyanusa Amarullah Ritonga, Basti Andriyoko, Rudi Wisaksana, Agnes Rengga Indrati, Nanny Natalia Mulyani Soetedjo, Laniyati Hamijoyo, Raspati Cundarani Koesoemadinata, Bachti Alisjahbana, Ida Parwati
{"title":"印度尼西亚万隆市结核病高危人群中标准E TB- feron ELISA和标准F TB- feron FIA阳性率及其与QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus的一致性","authors":"Dewi Kartika Turbawaty, Syifa Nur Maulida, Darin Rizka Anadhea, Mulyanusa Amarullah Ritonga, Basti Andriyoko, Rudi Wisaksana, Agnes Rengga Indrati, Nanny Natalia Mulyani Soetedjo, Laniyati Hamijoyo, Raspati Cundarani Koesoemadinata, Bachti Alisjahbana, Ida Parwati","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01486-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global public health problem. The determination of tuberculosis infection (TBI) using interferon-gamma release assay has now been used widely. We aim to evaluate the positivity rates of Standard E TB-Feron enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TB-Feron ELISA) and Standard F TB-Feron fluorescent immunoassay (TB-Feron FIA) and their agreement with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) among TB high-risk populations in Bandung City, Indonesia. We conducted a cross-sectional study, including people with a high risk of acquiring TB. We screened subjects for TB symptoms and offered chest X-ray (CXR). Anyone with cough or CXR suggestive of TB was asked to give sputum samples for GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra test. The positivity rates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated among patients with bacteriologically confirmed TB and among patients with no evidence of TB, no history of TB, and no known contact with TB patient (low risk of TBI). The agreement with QFT-Plus was calculated using Cohen's κ score. We enrolled 527 subjects, and the proportion of positive results among bacteriologically confirmed TB patients were 8 (53.3%; 95% CI 26.6-78.7), 9 (60.0%, 95% CI 32.3-83.7), and 10 (66.7%, 95% CI 38.4-88.8) by TB-Feron FIA, TB-Feron ELISA and QFT-Plus. The agreement between TB-Feron FIA and QFT-Plus among all subjects was similar to that of TB-Feron ELISA and QFT-Plus (84.1%, κ = 0.66, 95% CI 0.59-0.72). TB-Feron FIA and TB-Feron ELISA showed an acceptable clinical performance compared with QFT-Plus. These tests are useful alternatives for detecting TB infection.IMPORTANCEThis study evaluates the performance of two alternative interferon-gamma release assays, Standard E TB-Feron enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Standard F TB-Feron fluorescent immunoassay, for diagnosing tuberculosis infection (TBI) among high-risk populations in Bandung, Indonesia. Both assays demonstrated comparable clinical performance to the widely used QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus). Given the global burden of tuberculosis, particularly in resource-limited settings, these findings suggest that the TB-Feron assays could serve as reliable alternatives to QFT-Plus for TBI detection. This research highlights the potential for these assays to improve tuberculosis diagnosis, offering a more accessible and efficient screening tool, especially for high-risk populations, and supporting broader tuberculosis surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0148624"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standard E TB-Feron ELISA and Standard F TB-Feron FIA positivity rates and agreement with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus among TB high-risk population in Bandung, Indonesia.\",\"authors\":\"Dewi Kartika Turbawaty, Syifa Nur Maulida, Darin Rizka Anadhea, Mulyanusa Amarullah Ritonga, Basti Andriyoko, Rudi Wisaksana, Agnes Rengga Indrati, Nanny Natalia Mulyani Soetedjo, Laniyati Hamijoyo, Raspati Cundarani Koesoemadinata, Bachti Alisjahbana, Ida Parwati\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jcm.01486-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global public health problem. The determination of tuberculosis infection (TBI) using interferon-gamma release assay has now been used widely. We aim to evaluate the positivity rates of Standard E TB-Feron enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TB-Feron ELISA) and Standard F TB-Feron fluorescent immunoassay (TB-Feron FIA) and their agreement with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) among TB high-risk populations in Bandung City, Indonesia. We conducted a cross-sectional study, including people with a high risk of acquiring TB. We screened subjects for TB symptoms and offered chest X-ray (CXR). Anyone with cough or CXR suggestive of TB was asked to give sputum samples for GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra test. The positivity rates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated among patients with bacteriologically confirmed TB and among patients with no evidence of TB, no history of TB, and no known contact with TB patient (low risk of TBI). The agreement with QFT-Plus was calculated using Cohen's κ score. We enrolled 527 subjects, and the proportion of positive results among bacteriologically confirmed TB patients were 8 (53.3%; 95% CI 26.6-78.7), 9 (60.0%, 95% CI 32.3-83.7), and 10 (66.7%, 95% CI 38.4-88.8) by TB-Feron FIA, TB-Feron ELISA and QFT-Plus. The agreement between TB-Feron FIA and QFT-Plus among all subjects was similar to that of TB-Feron ELISA and QFT-Plus (84.1%, κ = 0.66, 95% CI 0.59-0.72). TB-Feron FIA and TB-Feron ELISA showed an acceptable clinical performance compared with QFT-Plus. These tests are useful alternatives for detecting TB infection.IMPORTANCEThis study evaluates the performance of two alternative interferon-gamma release assays, Standard E TB-Feron enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Standard F TB-Feron fluorescent immunoassay, for diagnosing tuberculosis infection (TBI) among high-risk populations in Bandung, Indonesia. Both assays demonstrated comparable clinical performance to the widely used QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus). Given the global burden of tuberculosis, particularly in resource-limited settings, these findings suggest that the TB-Feron assays could serve as reliable alternatives to QFT-Plus for TBI detection. This research highlights the potential for these assays to improve tuberculosis diagnosis, offering a more accessible and efficient screening tool, especially for high-risk populations, and supporting broader tuberculosis surveillance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0148624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01486-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01486-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结核病仍然是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。利用干扰素释放法检测结核感染(TBI)已得到广泛应用。我们的目的是评估在印度尼西亚万隆市结核病高危人群中,标准E -TB - feron酶联免疫吸附法(TB- feron ELISA)和标准F -TB - feron荧光免疫测定法(TB- feron FIA)的阳性率及其与QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus)的一致性。我们进行了一项横断面研究,包括感染结核病的高风险人群。我们对受试者进行结核病症状筛查,并提供胸部x光检查。任何有咳嗽或CXR提示结核病的人都被要求提供痰样本用于GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra检测。计算细菌学确诊结核病患者和无结核病证据、无结核病史、无已知接触结核病患者(TBI低风险)患者的阳性率和相应的95%置信区间(CI)。使用Cohen's κ评分计算与QFT-Plus的一致性。我们纳入了527名受试者,细菌学证实的结核病患者中阳性结果的比例为8 (53.3%;TB-Feron FIA、TB-Feron ELISA和QFT-Plus检测结果分别为:95% CI 26.6-78.7、9 (60.0%,95% CI 32.3-83.7)和10 (66.7%,95% CI 38.4-88.8)。TB-Feron FIA和QFT-Plus在所有受试者中的一致性与TB-Feron ELISA和QFT-Plus相似(84.1%,κ = 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 ~ 0.72)。与QFT-Plus相比,TB-Feron FIA和TB-Feron ELISA的临床表现可接受。这些检测是检测结核感染的有用替代方法。本研究评估了两种替代干扰素γ释放测定法的性能,标准E TB-Feron酶联免疫吸附测定法和标准F TB-Feron荧光免疫测定法,用于诊断印度尼西亚万隆高危人群中的结核病感染(TBI)。两种检测方法的临床性能均可与广泛使用的QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus)相媲美。鉴于结核病的全球负担,特别是在资源有限的情况下,这些发现表明,TB-Feron检测可以作为TBI检测QFT-Plus的可靠替代方案。这项研究强调了这些检测方法改善结核病诊断的潜力,提供了一种更容易获得和更有效的筛查工具,特别是对高危人群,并支持更广泛的结核病监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standard E TB-Feron ELISA and Standard F TB-Feron FIA positivity rates and agreement with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus among TB high-risk population in Bandung, Indonesia.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global public health problem. The determination of tuberculosis infection (TBI) using interferon-gamma release assay has now been used widely. We aim to evaluate the positivity rates of Standard E TB-Feron enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TB-Feron ELISA) and Standard F TB-Feron fluorescent immunoassay (TB-Feron FIA) and their agreement with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) among TB high-risk populations in Bandung City, Indonesia. We conducted a cross-sectional study, including people with a high risk of acquiring TB. We screened subjects for TB symptoms and offered chest X-ray (CXR). Anyone with cough or CXR suggestive of TB was asked to give sputum samples for GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra test. The positivity rates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated among patients with bacteriologically confirmed TB and among patients with no evidence of TB, no history of TB, and no known contact with TB patient (low risk of TBI). The agreement with QFT-Plus was calculated using Cohen's κ score. We enrolled 527 subjects, and the proportion of positive results among bacteriologically confirmed TB patients were 8 (53.3%; 95% CI 26.6-78.7), 9 (60.0%, 95% CI 32.3-83.7), and 10 (66.7%, 95% CI 38.4-88.8) by TB-Feron FIA, TB-Feron ELISA and QFT-Plus. The agreement between TB-Feron FIA and QFT-Plus among all subjects was similar to that of TB-Feron ELISA and QFT-Plus (84.1%, κ = 0.66, 95% CI 0.59-0.72). TB-Feron FIA and TB-Feron ELISA showed an acceptable clinical performance compared with QFT-Plus. These tests are useful alternatives for detecting TB infection.IMPORTANCEThis study evaluates the performance of two alternative interferon-gamma release assays, Standard E TB-Feron enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Standard F TB-Feron fluorescent immunoassay, for diagnosing tuberculosis infection (TBI) among high-risk populations in Bandung, Indonesia. Both assays demonstrated comparable clinical performance to the widely used QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus). Given the global burden of tuberculosis, particularly in resource-limited settings, these findings suggest that the TB-Feron assays could serve as reliable alternatives to QFT-Plus for TBI detection. This research highlights the potential for these assays to improve tuberculosis diagnosis, offering a more accessible and efficient screening tool, especially for high-risk populations, and supporting broader tuberculosis surveillance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信