秋水仙碱对使用维生素K拮抗剂的慢性冠心病患者凝血的影响。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jeroen P A Houwen, Arief Lalmohamed, Jochem Zwaan, Toine C G Egberts, Michiel Duyvendak, Aernoud T L Fiolet, Arend Mosterd
{"title":"秋水仙碱对使用维生素K拮抗剂的慢性冠心病患者凝血的影响。","authors":"Jeroen P A Houwen, Arief Lalmohamed, Jochem Zwaan, Toine C G Egberts, Michiel Duyvendak, Aernoud T L Fiolet, Arend Mosterd","doi":"10.1007/s00228-025-03815-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-dose (0.5 mg/day) colchicine improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary disease. Around 10-15% of these patients simultaneously use anticoagulant therapy, including vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs). In vitro studies and case reports have described a possible interaction between colchicine and VKAs leading to increased INR, but controlled studies are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate if there is a drug-drug interaction between low-dose colchicine and VKAs in patients with chronic coronary disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a sub-analysis of the randomized low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2 (LoDoCo2) trial. This placebo-controlled trial investigated efficacy of colchicine 0.5 mg once daily in patients with chronic coronary disease. For the current study, we included a selection of Dutch patients who concomitantly used a VKA. Following a 30 days open-label colchicine run-in phase, patients were randomized to colchicine or placebo. The primary outcome was the intra-patient difference in international normalized ratio (INR) during the first month after starting or stopping colchicine as compared to the preceding month. Secondary outcomes included changes in VKA daily dosage, assessed in the same pattern and before and after randomization, and time in therapeutic range (TTR), assessed before and after randomization to reflect long-term effects. INR measurements were part of routine clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 73 patients were included (35 colchicine and 38 in the placebo group). No significant intra-patient change in INR was observed after starting colchicine during the open-label run-in phase (mean INR: 2.60 before vs. 2.67 during run-in, difference 0.07, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.26; p = 0.50). Similarly, stopping colchicine treatment (i.e., randomization to placebo) did not significantly alter INR levels (mean INR: 2.70 during run-in vs. 2.81 after randomization, difference 0.11, 95% CI - 0.12 to 0.33; p = 0.34). The change in mean VKA daily dosage was - 0.01 mg (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.01; p = 0.35) when starting colchicine and - 0.01 mg (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.01; p = 0.41) when switching to placebo. TTR in patients allocated to active treatment was 65.8% in the year prior to the start of colchicine and 73.4% in the year after randomization to colchicine (change in TTR 7.56%, 95% CI - 0.14 to 15.26%; p = 0.05). Mean VKA dosage remained similar (change in VKA dosage of 0.01 mg; 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.13 mg; p = 0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant changes in INR, VKA dosage, or TTR in patients using VKAs after starting or stopping colchicine were observed. These results suggest that there is no need for additional INR monitoring beyond the standard of care when using low-dose colchicine, though further studies in larger populations would help to confirm this conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of colchicine on coagulation in patients with chronic coronary disease who use vitamin K antagonists.\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen P A Houwen, Arief Lalmohamed, Jochem Zwaan, Toine C G Egberts, Michiel Duyvendak, Aernoud T L Fiolet, Arend Mosterd\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00228-025-03815-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-dose (0.5 mg/day) colchicine improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary disease. Around 10-15% of these patients simultaneously use anticoagulant therapy, including vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs). In vitro studies and case reports have described a possible interaction between colchicine and VKAs leading to increased INR, but controlled studies are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate if there is a drug-drug interaction between low-dose colchicine and VKAs in patients with chronic coronary disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a sub-analysis of the randomized low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2 (LoDoCo2) trial. This placebo-controlled trial investigated efficacy of colchicine 0.5 mg once daily in patients with chronic coronary disease. For the current study, we included a selection of Dutch patients who concomitantly used a VKA. Following a 30 days open-label colchicine run-in phase, patients were randomized to colchicine or placebo. The primary outcome was the intra-patient difference in international normalized ratio (INR) during the first month after starting or stopping colchicine as compared to the preceding month. Secondary outcomes included changes in VKA daily dosage, assessed in the same pattern and before and after randomization, and time in therapeutic range (TTR), assessed before and after randomization to reflect long-term effects. INR measurements were part of routine clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 73 patients were included (35 colchicine and 38 in the placebo group). No significant intra-patient change in INR was observed after starting colchicine during the open-label run-in phase (mean INR: 2.60 before vs. 2.67 during run-in, difference 0.07, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.26; p = 0.50). Similarly, stopping colchicine treatment (i.e., randomization to placebo) did not significantly alter INR levels (mean INR: 2.70 during run-in vs. 2.81 after randomization, difference 0.11, 95% CI - 0.12 to 0.33; p = 0.34). The change in mean VKA daily dosage was - 0.01 mg (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.01; p = 0.35) when starting colchicine and - 0.01 mg (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.01; p = 0.41) when switching to placebo. TTR in patients allocated to active treatment was 65.8% in the year prior to the start of colchicine and 73.4% in the year after randomization to colchicine (change in TTR 7.56%, 95% CI - 0.14 to 15.26%; p = 0.05). Mean VKA dosage remained similar (change in VKA dosage of 0.01 mg; 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.13 mg; p = 0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant changes in INR, VKA dosage, or TTR in patients using VKAs after starting or stopping colchicine were observed. These results suggest that there is no need for additional INR monitoring beyond the standard of care when using low-dose colchicine, though further studies in larger populations would help to confirm this conclusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-025-03815-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-025-03815-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小剂量(0.5 毫克/天)秋水仙碱可改善稳定型冠心病患者的心血管预后。这些患者中约有 10-15% 同时使用抗凝疗法,包括维生素 K 拮抗剂 (VKA)。体外研究和病例报告描述了秋水仙碱和 VKAs 之间可能存在相互作用,导致 INR 增加,但缺乏对照研究:本研究旨在探讨慢性冠心病患者服用小剂量秋水仙碱和 VKA 之间是否存在药物相互作用:本研究是低剂量秋水仙碱用于心血管疾病二级预防随机试验 2(LoDoCo2)的子分析。这项安慰剂对照试验调查了秋水仙碱 0.5 毫克、每天一次对慢性冠心病患者的疗效。在本次研究中,我们选择了一些同时使用 VKA 的荷兰患者。在为期 30 天的秋水仙碱开放标签试运行阶段后,患者被随机分配到秋水仙碱或安慰剂中。主要结果是患者在开始或停止服用秋水仙碱后的第一个月内国际正常化比率(INR)与前一个月的差异。次要结果包括 VKA 每日用量的变化(以相同模式进行评估,随机化前后均进行评估)和治疗范围内时间(TTR)的变化(随机化前后均进行评估,以反映长期效果)。INR测量是常规临床护理的一部分:共纳入 73 例患者(秋水仙碱组 35 例,安慰剂组 38 例)。在开放标签试运行阶段开始服用秋水仙碱后,未观察到患者内部 INR 发生明显变化(试运行前平均 INR 为 2.60,试运行期间为 2.67,差异为 0.07,95% CI - 0.13 至 0.26;P = 0.50)。同样,停止秋水仙碱治疗(即随机分配至安慰剂)也不会显著改变 INR 水平(平均 INR:试运行期间为 2.70,随机分配后为 2.81,差异为 0.11,95% CI - 0.12 至 0.33;p = 0.34)。开始使用秋水仙碱时,平均 VKA 每日用量变化为 - 0.01 毫克(95% CI - 0.03 至 0.01;p = 0.35),而改用安慰剂时,平均 VKA 每日用量变化为 - 0.01 毫克(95% CI - 0.03 至 0.01;p = 0.41)。在开始使用秋水仙碱之前的一年中,接受积极治疗的患者的 TTR 为 65.8%,而在随机接受秋水仙碱治疗之后的一年中,TTR 为 73.4%(TTR 变化率为 7.56%,95% CI - 0.14 至 15.26%;P = 0.05)。平均VKA用量保持相似(VKA用量变化为0.01毫克;95% CI - 0.11至0.13毫克;P = 0.84):结论:使用 VKA 的患者在开始或停止使用秋水仙碱后,INR、VKA 剂量或 TTR 均无明显变化。这些结果表明,在使用低剂量秋水仙碱时,除标准护理外无需额外监测 INR,但在更大人群中开展进一步研究将有助于证实这一结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of colchicine on coagulation in patients with chronic coronary disease who use vitamin K antagonists.

Background: Low-dose (0.5 mg/day) colchicine improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary disease. Around 10-15% of these patients simultaneously use anticoagulant therapy, including vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs). In vitro studies and case reports have described a possible interaction between colchicine and VKAs leading to increased INR, but controlled studies are lacking.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate if there is a drug-drug interaction between low-dose colchicine and VKAs in patients with chronic coronary disease.

Methods: This study was a sub-analysis of the randomized low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease 2 (LoDoCo2) trial. This placebo-controlled trial investigated efficacy of colchicine 0.5 mg once daily in patients with chronic coronary disease. For the current study, we included a selection of Dutch patients who concomitantly used a VKA. Following a 30 days open-label colchicine run-in phase, patients were randomized to colchicine or placebo. The primary outcome was the intra-patient difference in international normalized ratio (INR) during the first month after starting or stopping colchicine as compared to the preceding month. Secondary outcomes included changes in VKA daily dosage, assessed in the same pattern and before and after randomization, and time in therapeutic range (TTR), assessed before and after randomization to reflect long-term effects. INR measurements were part of routine clinical care.

Results: In total, 73 patients were included (35 colchicine and 38 in the placebo group). No significant intra-patient change in INR was observed after starting colchicine during the open-label run-in phase (mean INR: 2.60 before vs. 2.67 during run-in, difference 0.07, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.26; p = 0.50). Similarly, stopping colchicine treatment (i.e., randomization to placebo) did not significantly alter INR levels (mean INR: 2.70 during run-in vs. 2.81 after randomization, difference 0.11, 95% CI - 0.12 to 0.33; p = 0.34). The change in mean VKA daily dosage was - 0.01 mg (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.01; p = 0.35) when starting colchicine and - 0.01 mg (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.01; p = 0.41) when switching to placebo. TTR in patients allocated to active treatment was 65.8% in the year prior to the start of colchicine and 73.4% in the year after randomization to colchicine (change in TTR 7.56%, 95% CI - 0.14 to 15.26%; p = 0.05). Mean VKA dosage remained similar (change in VKA dosage of 0.01 mg; 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.13 mg; p = 0.84).

Conclusion: No significant changes in INR, VKA dosage, or TTR in patients using VKAs after starting or stopping colchicine were observed. These results suggest that there is no need for additional INR monitoring beyond the standard of care when using low-dose colchicine, though further studies in larger populations would help to confirm this conclusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed. Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor. Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves -a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or -methods that are original in some basic sense, or -a highly unexpected outcome, or -conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信