直肠癌的外科治疗:机器人手术是最好的选择吗?叙述性评论。

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Chirurgia Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3079
Maria-Manuela Răvaş, Virgiliu-Mihail Prunoiu, Eugen Brătucu, Marian Marincaş, Laurenţiu Simion, Laura-Maria Manea, Mircea-Nicolae Brătucu
{"title":"直肠癌的外科治疗:机器人手术是最好的选择吗?叙述性评论。","authors":"Maria-Manuela Răvaş, Virgiliu-Mihail Prunoiu, Eugen Brătucu, Marian Marincaş, Laurenţiu Simion, Laura-Maria Manea, Mircea-Nicolae Brătucu","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rectal cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies, associated with high morbidity and mortality, which justify the constant interest in fine-tuning the available therapeutic methods and developing new ones. The preference for one surgical technique over another is highly dependent on the stage, the location of the tumor, other patient-related factors and the experience of the surgical team. This article aims to offer a comprehensive review of the surgical modalities utilized at the present time for the curative treatment of rectal cancer, as well as the future directions in this field, pointing out the latest progress and the most recent shifts in paradigm in the management of rectal cancer. The evolution of open surgery, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, and transanal techniques is described in chronological fashion, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. Although open surgery remains the gold standard for emergency situations such as occlusion or massive bleeding, minimally invasive surgery has gained ground over the past decade due to its benefits - faster discharge, lower infection rates, better short-term outcomes, while demonstrating similar oncological long term outcomes as in the traditional surgical approach. The main disadvantage is strongly connected with the training process, especially with gaining experience in complicated cases, as well as the total cost of equipment and maintenance. While robotic surgery has been lately successfully implemented in advanced or/and recurrent low and medium rectal cancer, laparoscopy remains the most utilized minimally invasive modality which has the undeniable advantage of shorter operating time. Additionally, one of the most discussed topics comprises the newly developed transanal techniques which offer an elegant solution for distal rectal tumors, especially in obese patients or with narrow pelvises. Continuous optimization and new developments of surgical techniques in rectal cancer lead to accomplishing the goals of precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"120 1","pages":"48-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Management of Rectal Cancer: Does Robotic Surgery Emerge as the Best Alternative? A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Maria-Manuela Răvaş, Virgiliu-Mihail Prunoiu, Eugen Brătucu, Marian Marincaş, Laurenţiu Simion, Laura-Maria Manea, Mircea-Nicolae Brătucu\",\"doi\":\"10.21614/chirurgia.3079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rectal cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies, associated with high morbidity and mortality, which justify the constant interest in fine-tuning the available therapeutic methods and developing new ones. The preference for one surgical technique over another is highly dependent on the stage, the location of the tumor, other patient-related factors and the experience of the surgical team. This article aims to offer a comprehensive review of the surgical modalities utilized at the present time for the curative treatment of rectal cancer, as well as the future directions in this field, pointing out the latest progress and the most recent shifts in paradigm in the management of rectal cancer. The evolution of open surgery, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, and transanal techniques is described in chronological fashion, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. Although open surgery remains the gold standard for emergency situations such as occlusion or massive bleeding, minimally invasive surgery has gained ground over the past decade due to its benefits - faster discharge, lower infection rates, better short-term outcomes, while demonstrating similar oncological long term outcomes as in the traditional surgical approach. The main disadvantage is strongly connected with the training process, especially with gaining experience in complicated cases, as well as the total cost of equipment and maintenance. While robotic surgery has been lately successfully implemented in advanced or/and recurrent low and medium rectal cancer, laparoscopy remains the most utilized minimally invasive modality which has the undeniable advantage of shorter operating time. Additionally, one of the most discussed topics comprises the newly developed transanal techniques which offer an elegant solution for distal rectal tumors, especially in obese patients or with narrow pelvises. Continuous optimization and new developments of surgical techniques in rectal cancer lead to accomplishing the goals of precision medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"48-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直肠癌是最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,具有较高的发病率和死亡率,这证明了对现有治疗方法进行微调和开发新方法的持续兴趣。一种手术技术对另一种手术技术的偏好高度依赖于肿瘤的分期、位置、其他与患者相关的因素和手术团队的经验。本文旨在全面综述目前用于直肠癌根治性治疗的手术方式,以及该领域的未来发展方向,指出直肠癌治疗的最新进展和模式的最新转变。本文将按时间顺序介绍开放手术、腹腔镜、机器人手术和经肛门技术的发展,并重点介绍每种手术的优缺点。虽然开放手术仍然是紧急情况(如闭塞或大出血)的金标准,但微创手术在过去十年中由于其优点(更快的出院,更低的感染率,更好的短期结果,同时显示出与传统手术方法相似的肿瘤长期结果)而取得了进展。主要的缺点与培训过程密切相关,特别是在复杂情况下获得经验,以及设备和维护的总成本。虽然机器人手术最近已经成功地应用于晚期或/和复发的中低位直肠癌,但腹腔镜手术仍然是最常用的微创手术方式,它具有不可否认的手术时间更短的优势。此外,讨论最多的话题之一包括新开发的经肛门技术,它为直肠远端肿瘤提供了一个优雅的解决方案,特别是在肥胖患者或骨盆狭窄的患者中。直肠癌手术技术的不断优化和新发展,为实现精准医学的目标奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Management of Rectal Cancer: Does Robotic Surgery Emerge as the Best Alternative? A Narrative Review.

Rectal cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies, associated with high morbidity and mortality, which justify the constant interest in fine-tuning the available therapeutic methods and developing new ones. The preference for one surgical technique over another is highly dependent on the stage, the location of the tumor, other patient-related factors and the experience of the surgical team. This article aims to offer a comprehensive review of the surgical modalities utilized at the present time for the curative treatment of rectal cancer, as well as the future directions in this field, pointing out the latest progress and the most recent shifts in paradigm in the management of rectal cancer. The evolution of open surgery, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, and transanal techniques is described in chronological fashion, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. Although open surgery remains the gold standard for emergency situations such as occlusion or massive bleeding, minimally invasive surgery has gained ground over the past decade due to its benefits - faster discharge, lower infection rates, better short-term outcomes, while demonstrating similar oncological long term outcomes as in the traditional surgical approach. The main disadvantage is strongly connected with the training process, especially with gaining experience in complicated cases, as well as the total cost of equipment and maintenance. While robotic surgery has been lately successfully implemented in advanced or/and recurrent low and medium rectal cancer, laparoscopy remains the most utilized minimally invasive modality which has the undeniable advantage of shorter operating time. Additionally, one of the most discussed topics comprises the newly developed transanal techniques which offer an elegant solution for distal rectal tumors, especially in obese patients or with narrow pelvises. Continuous optimization and new developments of surgical techniques in rectal cancer lead to accomplishing the goals of precision medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信