缺乏可重复性影响了三种芽孢杆菌对蛋鸡肠道沙门氏菌定殖影响的结论。

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
I Thøfner, M Olsen, L L Poulsen
{"title":"缺乏可重复性影响了三种芽孢杆菌对蛋鸡肠道沙门氏菌定殖影响的结论。","authors":"I Thøfner, M Olsen, L L Poulsen","doi":"10.1080/00071668.2025.2467948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1. <i>Salmonella</i> spp. are one of the most important foodborne zoonotic pathogens, often transmitted to humans through table eggs and fresh meat. Strategies for the prevention and reduction of <i>Salmonella</i> spp. in poultry include various approaches, such as biosecurity measures, vaccination and the use of feed additives, like probiotic bacteria.2. This study investigated the impact of a commercial <i>Bacillus</i>-based probiotic on <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Enteritidis (SE) colonisation in layer-type chicks, a critical issue for food safety. Lohmann Selected Leghorn chicks were divided into two groups, where one received GalliPro® Fit (Chr. Hansen A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark; 1.6 × 10⁶ CFU/g feed) from day-of-hatch, while the control group did not. On d 8, all chicks were orally challenged with SE (7-8 × 10⁵ CFU/bird). Cloacal swabs were collected on d 8, 10, 11 and 12 to assess shedding, and caecal contents were analysed for SE counts after euthanasia on d 12. The study was repeated three times with 30 chicks per group in each trial under consistent housing, husbandry and feeding conditions, except for differing parental bird origins. Shedding analysis was not performed in the final trial.3. The results were inconsistent. In the first trial, probiotic-treated chicks showed significantly reduced SE shedding and caecal loading compared to the control group. However, in the second trial, shedding and caecal loads were significantly higher in the probiotic group. The third trial revealed no significant differences between the groups.4. These findings showed that the probiotic effect on SE colonisation was inconclusive, despite identical experimental conditions, apart from parental bird origin. This highlighted the potential influence of parental health on offspring immunocompetence and gut microbiota, underscoring the challenges in interpreting <i>in vivo</i> studies. This study emphasised the need for reproducibility and careful evaluation of factors affecting trial outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9322,"journal":{"name":"British Poultry Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of reproducibility compromises conclusions on the effects of three <i>Bacillus</i> species on <i>Salmonella enterica</i> Enteritidis colonisation in layer-type chickens.\",\"authors\":\"I Thøfner, M Olsen, L L Poulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00071668.2025.2467948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>1. <i>Salmonella</i> spp. are one of the most important foodborne zoonotic pathogens, often transmitted to humans through table eggs and fresh meat. Strategies for the prevention and reduction of <i>Salmonella</i> spp. in poultry include various approaches, such as biosecurity measures, vaccination and the use of feed additives, like probiotic bacteria.2. This study investigated the impact of a commercial <i>Bacillus</i>-based probiotic on <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Enteritidis (SE) colonisation in layer-type chicks, a critical issue for food safety. Lohmann Selected Leghorn chicks were divided into two groups, where one received GalliPro® Fit (Chr. Hansen A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark; 1.6 × 10⁶ CFU/g feed) from day-of-hatch, while the control group did not. On d 8, all chicks were orally challenged with SE (7-8 × 10⁵ CFU/bird). Cloacal swabs were collected on d 8, 10, 11 and 12 to assess shedding, and caecal contents were analysed for SE counts after euthanasia on d 12. The study was repeated three times with 30 chicks per group in each trial under consistent housing, husbandry and feeding conditions, except for differing parental bird origins. Shedding analysis was not performed in the final trial.3. The results were inconsistent. In the first trial, probiotic-treated chicks showed significantly reduced SE shedding and caecal loading compared to the control group. However, in the second trial, shedding and caecal loads were significantly higher in the probiotic group. The third trial revealed no significant differences between the groups.4. These findings showed that the probiotic effect on SE colonisation was inconclusive, despite identical experimental conditions, apart from parental bird origin. This highlighted the potential influence of parental health on offspring immunocompetence and gut microbiota, underscoring the challenges in interpreting <i>in vivo</i> studies. This study emphasised the need for reproducibility and careful evaluation of factors affecting trial outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Poultry Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Poultry Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2025.2467948\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2025.2467948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 沙门氏菌是最重要的食源性人畜共患病病原体之一,通常通过食用鸡蛋和鲜肉传播给人类。预防和减少家禽沙门氏菌的策略包括各种方法,如生物安全措施、疫苗接种和使用饲料添加剂,如益生菌。本研究研究了一种商业芽孢杆菌益生菌对蛋鸡肠道沙门氏菌血清型肠炎(SE)定植的影响,这是食品安全的一个关键问题。Lohmann选定的来港鸡分为两组,其中一组接受GalliPro®Fit (Chr。Hansen A/S,丹麦Hoersholm;1.6 × 10⁶CFU/g饲料),而对照组则没有。第8天,所有雏鸡口服SE (7-8 × 10 CFU/只)。于第8、10、11和12天收集肛肠拭子以评估脱落情况,并于第12天安乐死后分析大便内容物的SE计数。试验重复3次,每组30只雏鸡,除不同的亲代鸟源外,在相同的饲养、饲养和饲养条件下进行试验。在最后的试验中没有进行脱落分析。结果并不一致。在第一次试验中,与对照组相比,益生菌处理的雏鸡SE脱落和盲肠负荷显著减少。然而,在第二次试验中,益生菌组的脱落和盲肠负荷明显更高。第三次试验显示各组之间没有显著差异。这些发现表明,尽管实验条件相同,除了亲本鸟类来源外,益生菌对SE定植的影响是不确定的。这突出了父母健康对后代免疫能力和肠道微生物群的潜在影响,强调了解释体内研究的挑战。这项研究强调了重复性和仔细评估影响试验结果的因素的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lack of reproducibility compromises conclusions on the effects of three Bacillus species on Salmonella enterica Enteritidis colonisation in layer-type chickens.

1. Salmonella spp. are one of the most important foodborne zoonotic pathogens, often transmitted to humans through table eggs and fresh meat. Strategies for the prevention and reduction of Salmonella spp. in poultry include various approaches, such as biosecurity measures, vaccination and the use of feed additives, like probiotic bacteria.2. This study investigated the impact of a commercial Bacillus-based probiotic on Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) colonisation in layer-type chicks, a critical issue for food safety. Lohmann Selected Leghorn chicks were divided into two groups, where one received GalliPro® Fit (Chr. Hansen A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark; 1.6 × 10⁶ CFU/g feed) from day-of-hatch, while the control group did not. On d 8, all chicks were orally challenged with SE (7-8 × 10⁵ CFU/bird). Cloacal swabs were collected on d 8, 10, 11 and 12 to assess shedding, and caecal contents were analysed for SE counts after euthanasia on d 12. The study was repeated three times with 30 chicks per group in each trial under consistent housing, husbandry and feeding conditions, except for differing parental bird origins. Shedding analysis was not performed in the final trial.3. The results were inconsistent. In the first trial, probiotic-treated chicks showed significantly reduced SE shedding and caecal loading compared to the control group. However, in the second trial, shedding and caecal loads were significantly higher in the probiotic group. The third trial revealed no significant differences between the groups.4. These findings showed that the probiotic effect on SE colonisation was inconclusive, despite identical experimental conditions, apart from parental bird origin. This highlighted the potential influence of parental health on offspring immunocompetence and gut microbiota, underscoring the challenges in interpreting in vivo studies. This study emphasised the need for reproducibility and careful evaluation of factors affecting trial outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Poultry Science
British Poultry Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: From its first volume in 1960, British Poultry Science has been a leading international journal for poultry scientists and advisers to the poultry industry throughout the world. Over 60% of the independently refereed papers published originate outside the UK. Most typically they report the results of biological studies with an experimental approach which either make an original contribution to fundamental science or are of obvious application to the industry. Subjects which are covered include: anatomy, embryology, biochemistry, biophysics, physiology, reproduction and genetics, behaviour, microbiology, endocrinology, nutrition, environmental science, food science, feeding stuffs and feeding, management and housing welfare, breeding, hatching, poultry meat and egg yields and quality.Papers that adopt a modelling approach or describe the scientific background to new equipment or apparatus directly relevant to the industry are also published. The journal also features rapid publication of Short Communications. Summaries of papers presented at the Spring Meeting of the UK Branch of the WPSA are published in British Poultry Abstracts .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信