{"title":"缺乏可重复性影响了三种芽孢杆菌对蛋鸡肠道沙门氏菌定殖影响的结论。","authors":"I Thøfner, M Olsen, L L Poulsen","doi":"10.1080/00071668.2025.2467948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1. <i>Salmonella</i> spp. are one of the most important foodborne zoonotic pathogens, often transmitted to humans through table eggs and fresh meat. Strategies for the prevention and reduction of <i>Salmonella</i> spp. in poultry include various approaches, such as biosecurity measures, vaccination and the use of feed additives, like probiotic bacteria.2. This study investigated the impact of a commercial <i>Bacillus</i>-based probiotic on <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Enteritidis (SE) colonisation in layer-type chicks, a critical issue for food safety. Lohmann Selected Leghorn chicks were divided into two groups, where one received GalliPro® Fit (Chr. Hansen A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark; 1.6 × 10⁶ CFU/g feed) from day-of-hatch, while the control group did not. On d 8, all chicks were orally challenged with SE (7-8 × 10⁵ CFU/bird). Cloacal swabs were collected on d 8, 10, 11 and 12 to assess shedding, and caecal contents were analysed for SE counts after euthanasia on d 12. The study was repeated three times with 30 chicks per group in each trial under consistent housing, husbandry and feeding conditions, except for differing parental bird origins. Shedding analysis was not performed in the final trial.3. The results were inconsistent. In the first trial, probiotic-treated chicks showed significantly reduced SE shedding and caecal loading compared to the control group. However, in the second trial, shedding and caecal loads were significantly higher in the probiotic group. The third trial revealed no significant differences between the groups.4. These findings showed that the probiotic effect on SE colonisation was inconclusive, despite identical experimental conditions, apart from parental bird origin. This highlighted the potential influence of parental health on offspring immunocompetence and gut microbiota, underscoring the challenges in interpreting <i>in vivo</i> studies. This study emphasised the need for reproducibility and careful evaluation of factors affecting trial outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9322,"journal":{"name":"British Poultry Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of reproducibility compromises conclusions on the effects of three <i>Bacillus</i> species on <i>Salmonella enterica</i> Enteritidis colonisation in layer-type chickens.\",\"authors\":\"I Thøfner, M Olsen, L L Poulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00071668.2025.2467948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>1. <i>Salmonella</i> spp. are one of the most important foodborne zoonotic pathogens, often transmitted to humans through table eggs and fresh meat. Strategies for the prevention and reduction of <i>Salmonella</i> spp. in poultry include various approaches, such as biosecurity measures, vaccination and the use of feed additives, like probiotic bacteria.2. This study investigated the impact of a commercial <i>Bacillus</i>-based probiotic on <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Enteritidis (SE) colonisation in layer-type chicks, a critical issue for food safety. Lohmann Selected Leghorn chicks were divided into two groups, where one received GalliPro® Fit (Chr. Hansen A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark; 1.6 × 10⁶ CFU/g feed) from day-of-hatch, while the control group did not. On d 8, all chicks were orally challenged with SE (7-8 × 10⁵ CFU/bird). Cloacal swabs were collected on d 8, 10, 11 and 12 to assess shedding, and caecal contents were analysed for SE counts after euthanasia on d 12. The study was repeated three times with 30 chicks per group in each trial under consistent housing, husbandry and feeding conditions, except for differing parental bird origins. Shedding analysis was not performed in the final trial.3. The results were inconsistent. In the first trial, probiotic-treated chicks showed significantly reduced SE shedding and caecal loading compared to the control group. However, in the second trial, shedding and caecal loads were significantly higher in the probiotic group. The third trial revealed no significant differences between the groups.4. These findings showed that the probiotic effect on SE colonisation was inconclusive, despite identical experimental conditions, apart from parental bird origin. This highlighted the potential influence of parental health on offspring immunocompetence and gut microbiota, underscoring the challenges in interpreting <i>in vivo</i> studies. This study emphasised the need for reproducibility and careful evaluation of factors affecting trial outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Poultry Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Poultry Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2025.2467948\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2025.2467948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lack of reproducibility compromises conclusions on the effects of three Bacillus species on Salmonella enterica Enteritidis colonisation in layer-type chickens.
1. Salmonella spp. are one of the most important foodborne zoonotic pathogens, often transmitted to humans through table eggs and fresh meat. Strategies for the prevention and reduction of Salmonella spp. in poultry include various approaches, such as biosecurity measures, vaccination and the use of feed additives, like probiotic bacteria.2. This study investigated the impact of a commercial Bacillus-based probiotic on Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) colonisation in layer-type chicks, a critical issue for food safety. Lohmann Selected Leghorn chicks were divided into two groups, where one received GalliPro® Fit (Chr. Hansen A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark; 1.6 × 10⁶ CFU/g feed) from day-of-hatch, while the control group did not. On d 8, all chicks were orally challenged with SE (7-8 × 10⁵ CFU/bird). Cloacal swabs were collected on d 8, 10, 11 and 12 to assess shedding, and caecal contents were analysed for SE counts after euthanasia on d 12. The study was repeated three times with 30 chicks per group in each trial under consistent housing, husbandry and feeding conditions, except for differing parental bird origins. Shedding analysis was not performed in the final trial.3. The results were inconsistent. In the first trial, probiotic-treated chicks showed significantly reduced SE shedding and caecal loading compared to the control group. However, in the second trial, shedding and caecal loads were significantly higher in the probiotic group. The third trial revealed no significant differences between the groups.4. These findings showed that the probiotic effect on SE colonisation was inconclusive, despite identical experimental conditions, apart from parental bird origin. This highlighted the potential influence of parental health on offspring immunocompetence and gut microbiota, underscoring the challenges in interpreting in vivo studies. This study emphasised the need for reproducibility and careful evaluation of factors affecting trial outcomes.
期刊介绍:
From its first volume in 1960, British Poultry Science has been a leading international journal for poultry scientists and advisers to the poultry industry throughout the world. Over 60% of the independently refereed papers published originate outside the UK. Most typically they report the results of biological studies with an experimental approach which either make an original contribution to fundamental science or are of obvious application to the industry. Subjects which are covered include: anatomy, embryology, biochemistry, biophysics, physiology, reproduction and genetics, behaviour, microbiology, endocrinology, nutrition, environmental science, food science, feeding stuffs and feeding, management and housing welfare, breeding, hatching, poultry meat and egg yields and quality.Papers that adopt a modelling approach or describe the scientific background to new equipment or apparatus directly relevant to the industry are also published. The journal also features rapid publication of Short Communications. Summaries of papers presented at the Spring Meeting of the UK Branch of the WPSA are published in British Poultry Abstracts .