在线患者的线下就诊意向:Grice格言与患者参与。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Xianye Cao, Yongmei Liu, Zian Fang, Zhangxiang Zhu
{"title":"在线患者的线下就诊意向:Grice格言与患者参与。","authors":"Xianye Cao, Yongmei Liu, Zian Fang, Zhangxiang Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02861-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online Healthcare Consulting Services (OHCS) can benefit physicians and patients. However, it is unclear how OHCS and what types of persuasive content enhance patients' intentions to visit offline. Based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Grice's maxims of the Cooperative Principle, we formulated hypotheses related to factors in the central route, peripheral route, and patient involvement that influence patients' offline visit intentions. We used the amount of information, reliability, relevance, and understandability to measure information quality. By collecting data from an online healthcare site, we employed a regression model to evaluate our hypotheses. The results revealed that central route factors (amount of information, reliability, relevance, and understandability) and peripheral cues positively affect patients' offline visits. We also verified that patient involvement increases the impact of central route factors. This study extended the application of ELM and Grice's maxims in the field of OHCS, offering insights into how patients form intentions to visit offline through persuasive online content and providing valuable practical guidance for online physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Offline visit intention of online patients: the Grice's maxims and patient involvement.\",\"authors\":\"Xianye Cao, Yongmei Liu, Zian Fang, Zhangxiang Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-025-02861-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Online Healthcare Consulting Services (OHCS) can benefit physicians and patients. However, it is unclear how OHCS and what types of persuasive content enhance patients' intentions to visit offline. Based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Grice's maxims of the Cooperative Principle, we formulated hypotheses related to factors in the central route, peripheral route, and patient involvement that influence patients' offline visit intentions. We used the amount of information, reliability, relevance, and understandability to measure information quality. By collecting data from an online healthcare site, we employed a regression model to evaluate our hypotheses. The results revealed that central route factors (amount of information, reliability, relevance, and understandability) and peripheral cues positively affect patients' offline visits. We also verified that patient involvement increases the impact of central route factors. This study extended the application of ELM and Grice's maxims in the field of OHCS, offering insights into how patients form intentions to visit offline through persuasive online content and providing valuable practical guidance for online physicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02861-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02861-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线医疗保健咨询服务(OHCS)可以使医生和患者受益。然而,目前尚不清楚OHCS如何以及哪种类型的有说服力的内容增强了患者线下访问的意愿。基于精化似然模型(ELM)和Grice的合作原则,我们提出了影响患者线下就诊意愿的中心路径、外围路径和患者参与等因素的假设。我们使用信息量、可靠性、相关性和可理解性来衡量信息质量。通过从在线医疗保健网站收集数据,我们采用回归模型来评估我们的假设。结果显示,中心路径因素(信息量、可靠性、相关性和可理解性)和外围线索对患者的线下就诊有积极影响。我们也证实了患者参与增加了中央通路因素的影响。本研究扩展了ELM和Grice格言在OHCS领域的应用,为患者如何通过有说服力的在线内容形成线下就诊意愿提供了见解,并为在线医生提供了有价值的实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Offline visit intention of online patients: the Grice's maxims and patient involvement.

Online Healthcare Consulting Services (OHCS) can benefit physicians and patients. However, it is unclear how OHCS and what types of persuasive content enhance patients' intentions to visit offline. Based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Grice's maxims of the Cooperative Principle, we formulated hypotheses related to factors in the central route, peripheral route, and patient involvement that influence patients' offline visit intentions. We used the amount of information, reliability, relevance, and understandability to measure information quality. By collecting data from an online healthcare site, we employed a regression model to evaluate our hypotheses. The results revealed that central route factors (amount of information, reliability, relevance, and understandability) and peripheral cues positively affect patients' offline visits. We also verified that patient involvement increases the impact of central route factors. This study extended the application of ELM and Grice's maxims in the field of OHCS, offering insights into how patients form intentions to visit offline through persuasive online content and providing valuable practical guidance for online physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信