隧道血液透析导管移除的培训和实践差异:一项对英国肾脏病实习生的调查。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ismet Boral, Shalabh Srivastava, Joanna McKinnell
{"title":"隧道血液透析导管移除的培训和实践差异:一项对英国肾脏病实习生的调查。","authors":"Ismet Boral, Shalabh Srivastava, Joanna McKinnell","doi":"10.1186/s12882-025-04034-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The tunnelled haemodialysis catheter (TDC) removal is a necessary skill for the nephrology trainee as this task is undertaken routinely in renal units. Little published data exists to establish current practice and there is no national guidance regarding TDC removal in United Kingdom (UK). Anecdotally, trainees suggest they do not have sufficient supervised training in TDC removal. We aimed to establish the differences in training and practice in TDC removal among nephrology trainees across UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We created an online survey with twenty questions for trainee and non-training nephrology registrars working in UK. The survey was distributed via regional renal training programme directors, UK Kidney Association, \"Renal SpR Club\" and online professional social networks including social media and instant messaging services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 75 responses from all of 14 postgraduate training deaneries. 91% reported renal registrars remove TDCs in their units. 53% of the operators were taught by another registrar. Only 16% report awareness of written local trust guidance on TDC removal. 43% reported removing > 10 TDCs a year. Cut-down method is preferred over traction method for TDC removal. 63% remove TDCs in designated procedure areas, 52% obtain written consent and 65% wear full sterile personal protective equipment (PPE). 16% report removing TDCs alone with no assistant and 12% do not stop aspirin, antiplatelets or anticoagulants beforehand. 30% of operators reported experiencing a \"stuck catheter\" at some point in their careers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights that TDC removal is a common procedure and predominantly performed by renal physicians in teaching hospitals. It is mostly undertaken by registrar level doctors often without formal training or written guidelines with varying techniques. 68% of participants want this procedure to be part of mandatory training in the renal post graduate training curriculum.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in training and practice in tunnelled haemodialysis catheter removal: a survey of nephrology trainees across United Kingdom.\",\"authors\":\"Ismet Boral, Shalabh Srivastava, Joanna McKinnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12882-025-04034-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The tunnelled haemodialysis catheter (TDC) removal is a necessary skill for the nephrology trainee as this task is undertaken routinely in renal units. Little published data exists to establish current practice and there is no national guidance regarding TDC removal in United Kingdom (UK). Anecdotally, trainees suggest they do not have sufficient supervised training in TDC removal. We aimed to establish the differences in training and practice in TDC removal among nephrology trainees across UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We created an online survey with twenty questions for trainee and non-training nephrology registrars working in UK. The survey was distributed via regional renal training programme directors, UK Kidney Association, \\\"Renal SpR Club\\\" and online professional social networks including social media and instant messaging services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 75 responses from all of 14 postgraduate training deaneries. 91% reported renal registrars remove TDCs in their units. 53% of the operators were taught by another registrar. Only 16% report awareness of written local trust guidance on TDC removal. 43% reported removing > 10 TDCs a year. Cut-down method is preferred over traction method for TDC removal. 63% remove TDCs in designated procedure areas, 52% obtain written consent and 65% wear full sterile personal protective equipment (PPE). 16% report removing TDCs alone with no assistant and 12% do not stop aspirin, antiplatelets or anticoagulants beforehand. 30% of operators reported experiencing a \\\"stuck catheter\\\" at some point in their careers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey highlights that TDC removal is a common procedure and predominantly performed by renal physicians in teaching hospitals. It is mostly undertaken by registrar level doctors often without formal training or written guidelines with varying techniques. 68% of participants want this procedure to be part of mandatory training in the renal post graduate training curriculum.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04034-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04034-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:隧道血液透析导管(TDC)的移除是肾脏病实习生的一项必要技能,因为这项任务是在肾脏部门常规进行的。几乎没有公开的数据来确定当前的做法,英国也没有关于消除TDC的国家指南。有趣的是,受训者表示,他们没有接受足够的在监督下拆除TDC的培训。我们的目的是建立在全英国肾脏病实习生中TDC去除的培训和实践的差异。方法:我们创建了一个包含20个问题的在线调查,对象是在英国工作的实习和非培训肾病注册医师。该调查是通过地区肾脏培训项目主管、英国肾脏协会、“肾脏SpR俱乐部”以及包括社交媒体和即时通讯服务在内的在线专业社交网络发布的。结果:我们收到了来自14个研究生培养中心的75份反馈。91%报告肾脏登记员在他们的单位内清除了tdc。53%的操作员由另一位注册师教授。只有16%的人表示了解当地信托机构关于拆除TDC的书面指导。43%的人报告说,他们一年切除了100万颗tdc。切断法优于牵引法去除TDC。63%的人在指定的程序区域移除tdc, 52%的人获得书面同意,65%的人穿戴完整的无菌个人防护装备。16%的患者报告在没有辅助的情况下单独去除tdc, 12%的患者事先未停用阿司匹林、抗血小板或抗凝血药物。30%的作业者报告在他们的职业生涯中遇到过“卡管”。结论:本调查强调TDC切除是一种常见的手术,主要由教学医院的肾脏医生进行。它主要由注册级别的医生承担,通常没有经过正式培训,也没有各种技术的书面指导方针。68%的参与者希望该程序成为肾脏研究生培训课程的强制性培训的一部分。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in training and practice in tunnelled haemodialysis catheter removal: a survey of nephrology trainees across United Kingdom.

Background: The tunnelled haemodialysis catheter (TDC) removal is a necessary skill for the nephrology trainee as this task is undertaken routinely in renal units. Little published data exists to establish current practice and there is no national guidance regarding TDC removal in United Kingdom (UK). Anecdotally, trainees suggest they do not have sufficient supervised training in TDC removal. We aimed to establish the differences in training and practice in TDC removal among nephrology trainees across UK.

Method: We created an online survey with twenty questions for trainee and non-training nephrology registrars working in UK. The survey was distributed via regional renal training programme directors, UK Kidney Association, "Renal SpR Club" and online professional social networks including social media and instant messaging services.

Results: We received 75 responses from all of 14 postgraduate training deaneries. 91% reported renal registrars remove TDCs in their units. 53% of the operators were taught by another registrar. Only 16% report awareness of written local trust guidance on TDC removal. 43% reported removing > 10 TDCs a year. Cut-down method is preferred over traction method for TDC removal. 63% remove TDCs in designated procedure areas, 52% obtain written consent and 65% wear full sterile personal protective equipment (PPE). 16% report removing TDCs alone with no assistant and 12% do not stop aspirin, antiplatelets or anticoagulants beforehand. 30% of operators reported experiencing a "stuck catheter" at some point in their careers.

Conclusions: This survey highlights that TDC removal is a common procedure and predominantly performed by renal physicians in teaching hospitals. It is mostly undertaken by registrar level doctors often without formal training or written guidelines with varying techniques. 68% of participants want this procedure to be part of mandatory training in the renal post graduate training curriculum.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信