修订错配修复缺陷肿瘤微卫星不稳定性的解释标准,伴有细微的电泳改变。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Ming-Tseh Lin, Eric Christenson, Suping Chen, Emily Adams, Matthew Bayes, James R Eshleman
{"title":"修订错配修复缺陷肿瘤微卫星不稳定性的解释标准,伴有细微的电泳改变。","authors":"Ming-Tseh Lin, Eric Christenson, Suping Chen, Emily Adams, Matthew Bayes, James R Eshleman","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve analytic performance characteristics of a microsatellite instability (MSI-V1.2) assay in endometrial cancers (ECs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nonneoplastic and neoplastic DNA from colorectal cancers (CRCs) and ECs were compared to define MSI by calculating base shifting of the highest peak and the 5% peak (the leftmost peak with a peak height >5% of the highest peak).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We first demonstrated highly precise sizing by capillary electrophoresis. However, relative intensity of multiple peaks, characteristic for microsatellite amplicons, might show a 1-base, but not a 2-base or more, shift of the highest or 5% peak among duplicate runs of nonneoplastic DNA. This inherent bias of the polymerase chain reaction-based MSI assay may lead to false-positive interpretation if MSI was defined by a 1-base shift or more. Subsequently, MSI was evaluated by a 2-base shift or more of the highest peak (original criteria) or a 2-base shift or more of either the highest or 5% peak (revised criteria) without subjective interpretation of a subtle change of electropherogram configuration (the so-called shoulder pattern). While both criteria were highly sensitive in CRCs, the revised criteria improved sensitivity (83% vs 67%) and accuracy (89% vs 79%) and maintained 100% specificity in ECs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The revised criteria provided sensitive, specific, and objective interpretation to examine subtle changes of MSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision of interpretation criteria to define microsatellite instability in mismatch repair-deficient neoplasms with subtle electropherogram changes.\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Tseh Lin, Eric Christenson, Suping Chen, Emily Adams, Matthew Bayes, James R Eshleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajcp/aqaf011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve analytic performance characteristics of a microsatellite instability (MSI-V1.2) assay in endometrial cancers (ECs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nonneoplastic and neoplastic DNA from colorectal cancers (CRCs) and ECs were compared to define MSI by calculating base shifting of the highest peak and the 5% peak (the leftmost peak with a peak height >5% of the highest peak).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We first demonstrated highly precise sizing by capillary electrophoresis. However, relative intensity of multiple peaks, characteristic for microsatellite amplicons, might show a 1-base, but not a 2-base or more, shift of the highest or 5% peak among duplicate runs of nonneoplastic DNA. This inherent bias of the polymerase chain reaction-based MSI assay may lead to false-positive interpretation if MSI was defined by a 1-base shift or more. Subsequently, MSI was evaluated by a 2-base shift or more of the highest peak (original criteria) or a 2-base shift or more of either the highest or 5% peak (revised criteria) without subjective interpretation of a subtle change of electropherogram configuration (the so-called shoulder pattern). While both criteria were highly sensitive in CRCs, the revised criteria improved sensitivity (83% vs 67%) and accuracy (89% vs 79%) and maintained 100% specificity in ECs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The revised criteria provided sensitive, specific, and objective interpretation to examine subtle changes of MSI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提高微卫星不稳定性(MSI-V1.2)测定在子宫内膜癌(ECs)中的分析性能特征。方法:比较来自结直肠癌(crc)和ECs的非肿瘤性和肿瘤性DNA,通过计算峰值和5%峰值的基移来定义MSI(最左边的峰值,峰值高度为峰值的5%)。结果:我们首次证明了毛细管电泳的高精确度。然而,多峰的相对强度,微卫星扩增子的特征,可能显示1个碱基,而不是2个碱基或更多,在非肿瘤DNA的重复序列中,最高峰移动或5%。如果MSI被定义为1个碱基移位或更多,基于聚合酶链反应的MSI测定的这种固有偏差可能导致假阳性解释。随后,MSI通过峰值的2个碱基移位或更多(原始标准)或最高或5%的峰值的2个碱基移位或更多(修订标准)来评估,而无需主观解释电泳结构的细微变化(所谓的肩部模式)。虽然这两种标准对crc都高度敏感,但修订后的标准提高了敏感性(83%对67%)和准确性(89%对79%),并在ECs中保持了100%的特异性。结论:修订后的标准对细微的MSI变化提供了敏感、具体和客观的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revision of interpretation criteria to define microsatellite instability in mismatch repair-deficient neoplasms with subtle electropherogram changes.

Objectives: To improve analytic performance characteristics of a microsatellite instability (MSI-V1.2) assay in endometrial cancers (ECs).

Methods: Nonneoplastic and neoplastic DNA from colorectal cancers (CRCs) and ECs were compared to define MSI by calculating base shifting of the highest peak and the 5% peak (the leftmost peak with a peak height >5% of the highest peak).

Results: We first demonstrated highly precise sizing by capillary electrophoresis. However, relative intensity of multiple peaks, characteristic for microsatellite amplicons, might show a 1-base, but not a 2-base or more, shift of the highest or 5% peak among duplicate runs of nonneoplastic DNA. This inherent bias of the polymerase chain reaction-based MSI assay may lead to false-positive interpretation if MSI was defined by a 1-base shift or more. Subsequently, MSI was evaluated by a 2-base shift or more of the highest peak (original criteria) or a 2-base shift or more of either the highest or 5% peak (revised criteria) without subjective interpretation of a subtle change of electropherogram configuration (the so-called shoulder pattern). While both criteria were highly sensitive in CRCs, the revised criteria improved sensitivity (83% vs 67%) and accuracy (89% vs 79%) and maintained 100% specificity in ECs.

Conclusions: The revised criteria provided sensitive, specific, and objective interpretation to examine subtle changes of MSI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信